Sentences with phrase «if individuals believed»

If an individual believes that growth will come from emerging markets in the decades ahead, pink sheet stocks like those and others offer an ideal investment vehicle.

If an individual believes that any of their personal information is inaccurate, we will make appropriate corrections.

If an individual believes he or she has been subjected to discrimination, he / she should contact the Commission's Director of Arts Access, [phone].

If an individual believes that these small actions solve the problem, or has discharged him of his moral responsibility, explain why this is not the case.

From a clinical perspective, if an individual believes that emotions are irrational, experiencing emotions could be an aversive event, because potentially leading to being judged an irrational person.

If an individual believes any Personal Information concerning that individual is not correct, that person may request an amendment of that information by sending a request to the person indicated in Section 1 of this Policy.

Not exact matches

Now if this was the only evidence, one might lean towards a typo in the journal and believing the above three individuals and public congressional record.

In addition to the rules - based approach, Mester also suggested the Fed not focus so much on short - term data changes in its economic projections, and tweaking those projections to link them to where each individual member believes the funds rate should be if those conditions come to fruition.

If people around an individual provide specific information showing that the person poses a risk, and two police officers agree that there is probable cause to believe that the person is an imminent threat, they submit a short affidavit of the proof to a judge.

If you review the personal bankruptcy filings of individuals making $ 500k or more, you will see what federal judges and bankruptcy trustees believe are «necessary expenses» and which are not.

IF THE COMPANY BELIEVES, IN ITS SOLE DISCRETION, THAT ANY INDIVIDUALS OR ENTITIES OWNING CTK CREATES MATERIAL REGULATORY OR OTHER LEGAL RISKS OR ADVERSE EFFECTS FOR THE COMPANY AND / OR CTK, THE COMPANY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO: (A) BUY ALL CTK FROM SUCH CTK OWNERS AT THE THEN - EXISTING MARKET PRICE AND / OR (B) SELL ALL CRYPTOCURRENCY ASSETS OF THE COMPANY.

Many individual bondholders believe the implications of interest rate fluctuations don't impact them because they'll receive their principal value on an individual bond if held to maturity.

Obama says he believes in an individual right to keep and bear arms, but if even one of the non-liberal Justices is replaced by an Obama appointee, you can be sure that we will have an anti-Heller and anti-individual right majority on the Supreme Court.

They are communitarians, that is, «if philosophical liberals are those who believe that all our problems can be solved by autonomous individuals, a market economy, and a procedural state, whereas communitarians believe that more substantive ethical identities and a more active participation in a democratic polity are necessary for the functioning of any decent society.»

If Mr. Baer is not familiar with individuals and groups who vigorously promote the goals of the AIDS lobby as described in the editorial, perhaps Atlanta is more culturally isolated than we have reason to believe is the case.

It's just a shame that we haven't come to the point in society where it should be required that those who make decisions must meet certain, more highly regulated, fool proof, corruption resistant criteria proving their intellect and open mindedness as well as weeding out individuals with preconceived notions, racist, sexist or religiously or other discriminative views (even if they themselves don't believe they are discriminative in their beliefs... this happens more than many people realize) and overall ignorant minds.

Dalahast, «And what if you had other sane and reasonable minded individuals expressing the same compelling reasons to believe in aliens?»

As an atheist who believes in «Choice» (I dislike the idea of abortion but see the need for people to be able to opt for it) and polygamy (marriage should be for any number of consenting adults regardless of gender) and believes that the idea of draconian anti-gun measures is anathema as it takes away an individual's right to live the way he wants to live, I think that if believing in a deity makes a person treat other people nicer then we should leave that person and his beliefs alone.

I also believe that an individual who would otherwise be against that might do it only because if he doesn't he might be punished or imprisoned or ostracized for it.

Plantinga, however does affirm I2, in that he does believe that God could have unilaterally «brought about» a world containing no evil if he had chosen not to create at all or to actualize a possible world containing no self - determining individuals other than himself.

But, if you feel there is never a wrong reason for becoming a christian, even if an individual does it for no other reason than playing it safe, never believed in god, will go their whole never never truly bielving, does the minimum (paying lip service), and to really point a cherry on top, doesn't live anything close to a «christian lifestyle outside of the few hours on Sundays (just a rotten to the core person, thief, liar, cheater... rappist, murderer...) Is there STILL no wrong reason for becoming religeous?

It is obviously up to the individual to see if they believe and want this.

Others believe that the social and cultural fruits of religious awakening will appear gradually if we are patient, arguing that once individual Christians are spiritually reborn in great numbers, they will inevitably act as salt and leaven within the society.

Sometimes I wonder if perhaps the rooms of Alcoholics Anonymous have, at some point in its 76 year history, contained individuals who possessed the ability to do great things — cure cancer, revolutionize politics, or contribute other great things to society — but whose minds became so polluted with AA propaganda that they shut off their own brilliance and chose to spend the rest of their lives «making their sobriety their number one priority» and believing humility to be more valuable than fulfilling their potential and allowing their greatness to shine.

I am an atheist... If this is the worst, I'll take it... What I will not take is the rest, the constant interference of religion in everyday lives, the less and less clear separation between Church and State, the bigoted right - wingers who look down on us (us who think that we have escaped the greatest delusion of all, us who believe that religion is a way to escape individual neurosis by adhering to a social neurosis...), the attempts at proselytism, the anti-Darwinian «oh - so - lame» criticism..

If individuals are emergents from their relationships, as I believe they are, then the practice of linear power blocks the full flow of energy that could be productive of the emergence of greater - sized individuals from these relationships.

And I also wonder if the author has even bothered to ask these individuals what they believe.

If you believe otherwise, you are (by default), stating that your deity is, in fact in favor of a special and elevated group of individuals (such as yourself and your favorite authors) who can and should control others faith by virtue of their special understanding of this god and his «inspired» word.

If an individual doctor believes it is in the best interest of the patient's health to perform a particular method of abortion, then this judgment must be defended.

While living a celibate life can be very challenging, I don't believe that it is inherently harmful if it is a freely chosen commitment made by the individual.

she was only selfish bc she believed if you work hard you should receive benefit (eg The American Dream) not the lazy individuals who do nothing.

There are a number of individuals and organizations (religious and secular) that firmly believe in non-violent strategies as the only, if not the best, way to deal with the past and to build a just future society.

But if God serves the functions of an attachment relationship in our individual lives, it can be the difference between cognitively believing in God, as most do, and emotionally connecting, trusting, and walking with him every day, which is much less common.

Individual liberty — to believe whatever you want, even if it is the Bible — is at the core of their message.

If you disagree and believe these people without a chance for further discipleship (and thus worth ditching the «sunday morning service» for), I hope you do so a) intentionally and b) with a detailed plan of how you will reach these individuals without using conventional methods.

Even if we consciously acknowledge it is an illusion, we choose to believe it because we innately suspect this is better for us, that it will help us feel better, and will actually make us happier individuals.

The romantics, such as Ralph Waldo Emerson, believed that as the individual traveled deeply into his or her imagination, that he or she would find that universal truth (that noumenal reality, if you will) that is the same for all people.

You're rant is rather incomprehensible, you're all over the map, but if you really believe that corporations, or any business would have an individual at the «C» level who was promoting anything out of hate, you are completely ignorant, don't know a thing about the corporate world, and absolutely nothing about law, free markets, or economics.

Yet if there is such a thing as truth in our beliefs and practices, then ignoring those truths is not an expression of mercy, but a form of spiritually damaging confusion — dangerous for the individual, and dangerous for the believing community as a whole.

If their religion against issues you believe should be left to the individual to decide.

What if you are a pious individual who believes in God (or gods, goddesses, etc.) but believes in the wrong one?

We may also share your personal information with companies, organizations or individuals if we believe that disclosure of the information is necessary for legal or safety reasons.

If you believe we might have any information from or about an individual under the legal purchase age, please contact us at [email protected].

In addition, Innovative Dining Group may disclose personally identifiable information about you to other companies or individuals in the following circumstances: - Innovative Dining Group utilizes third party service providers to provide products, services or functions on IDG's behalf (such as sending emails or processing credit cards or fulfilling orders placed online) and asks these service providers to agree to maintain the confidentiality of your personally identifiable information and not to use your personally identifiable information for any reason except to carry out the purpose (s) for which we retained them; - Innovative Dining Group needs to protect its legal rights (e.g., if Innovative Dining Group is trying to collect money you owe); - Innovative Dining Group must comply with applicable laws, regulations or legal or regulatory processes; - Innovative Dining Group has reason to believe that someone may be causing injury to someone or interfering with - In connection with a sale, merger, transfer, exchange or other disposition of all or a portion of the business conducted by the web site.

If you are going to try to discredit what others are doing by simply using your own personal experiences as an example to make your case then you are a short sighted, egotistical individual who believes the world revolves around them.

this article typifies everything that is wrong with our club... if you had any balls you would have started with that Mertz nonsense, but instead, like Wenger, you started out pretending to be a rational individual only to reveal your true unintelligible in the final paragraph... I feel like you have never watched Mertz play except for in the FA Cup final last year... how does someone help defend corners, crosses and the like when you can't man - mark, you have a negative vertical and you close your eyes whenever the ball comes in your direction... this was a panic buy that didn't make sense then, considering how most teams were setup to counterattack us, and it makes even less sense now... he was well past his prime when he arrived, like Podolski, Arteta, Flamini 2.0 among numerous others, and was used by Wenger to trick the uninformed fans into believing he cared about turning this team into a true contender

There isnt much else to talk about during transfer window than rumours so its up to every individuals judgement if they believe them or not.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Although it will be incredibly difficult to ever match his contributions on the pitch, it's vitally important for a former club legend, like Henry, to publicly address his concerns regarding the direction of this club... regardless of those who still feel that Henry has some sort of agenda due to the backlash he received following earlier comments he made on air regarding Arsenal, he has an intimate understanding of the game, he knows the fans are being hosed and he feels some sense of obligation, both professionally and personally, to tell it like he sees it... much like I've continually expressed over the last couple months, this team isn't evolving under this current ownership / management team... instead we are currently experiencing a «stagnant» phase in our club's storied history... a fact that can't be hidden by simply changing the formation or bringing in one or two individuals... this team needs fundamental change in the way it conducts business both on and off the pitch or it will continue to slowly devolve into a second tier club... regardless of the euphoria surrounding our escape act on Friday evening, as it stands, this club is more likely to be fighting for a Europa League spot for the foreseeable future than a top 4 finish... we can't hope for the failures of others to secure our place in the top 4, we need to be the manufacturers of our own success by doing whatever is necessary to evolve as an organization... if Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke can't take the necessary steps following the debacle they manufactured last season, their removal is imperative for our future success... unfortunately, I strongly believe that either they don't know how to proceed in the present economic climate or they are unwilling to do whatever it takes to turn this ship around... just look at the current state of our squad, none of our world class players are under contract beyond this season, we have a ridiculous wage bill considering the results, we can't sell our deadwood because we've mismanaged our personnel decisions and contractual obligations, we haven't properly cultivated our younger talent and we might have become one of the worst clubs ever when it comes to way we handle our transfer business, which under Dein was one of our greatest assets... it's time to get things right!!!

However, there is a feeling that an individual in Salah's camp would encourage him to take an offer if it came from Madrid while highly - influential figures back in Egypt could also apply pressure to consider such an opportunity if it presented itself as they believe it would be a great boost for their country.