Sentences with phrase «if it runs true»

«Look at the number of Local Governments we have, if we run true federalism, we would not be having 37 Local Council Development Areas (LCDAs) and 20 Local Governments.

Im one that prefers to try things on since you never know how if they run true to size.

If this runs true, the Accent will land near the middle of the segment, but leads with standard features like the touchscreen infotainment, power windows, and backup camera.

And Smith predicts that activity will continue apace until about 2005 or 2006, at which time «if we run true to trend, our next economic cycle will begin and things will start to slow down.»

Not exact matches

Pointing to another critique — that if she ran further to the left she would've pulled out victories in the Midwest — Clinton said she doesn't believe that to be true.

If the rumors are true, the nation's largest online retailer could give Square and PayPal a run for their money.

Vladeck, now a professor at Georgetown Law, said violations of the consent decree could carry a penalty of $ 40,000 per violation, meaning that if news reports that the data of 50 million people were shared proves true, the company's possible exposure runs into the trillions of dollars.

It's true - if you run that research from 1965 to the present, the «predicted» value of the S&P 500 P / E, based on current inflation and interest rates, is indeed about 22.

I think that if we have two countries that each perfectly meet price level targets and long - run purchasing power parity is true, then we're necessarily in a world where real interest rate parity is also true.

If Long Run Purchasing Power Parity is true, in levels, then I think you are right.

The latter possibility, whether true or not at its inception, can ultimately become a self - fulfilling prophesy if it results in a run on the financial system.

This is especially true if you leave it running overnight or on whilst your at work.

But that's not really true; when Pew researchers asked payday loan users what they would do if they ran short of cash and couldn't get a payday loan, more than 80 % simply said they'd cut down on other expenses.

In either case, there's no evidence to support wasting one's only life as if one or more of the god fables is true, much less running a nation or world as if it were.

If we were ever able to look outside of Acts 2 to understand true biblical community, we would know how to speak into one another's lives about where we are running from God.

I can and do love and listen to the Buddhist, the Hindu, the Muslim, and the Mormon, but if I do not pray nor challenge them with truth in the long run then I am simply performing an act of contextualization — which is a far cry from the true seed planting of evangelism.

But if it's true that our government did all that in an hour then I am definitely voting for Obama when he runs for reelection because I'm pretty sure he's a freaking sorcerer.

If it held true to the Bible (which they don't), they would excommunicate any of their members who ran for political office.

I really think it runs that deep, this idea [of] the American myths — and whether it's true or not is not the point — this is the way that we shaped our identity, this rugged individualism, this rifle and shovel, that if you work hard you can get your dreams, and we're not gonna be a monarchy.

This is different from numbers 2 and 3 because it suggests that there is one religion, the one that converges the fastest, that really is «better» than the others, at least in a functional sense, if not necessarily «truer» in the long run.

And should one run the risk of losing faith by examining its true foundations, he is certain to be chilled by the dictum, in Hebrews 6:4 - 6, that «It is impossible for those who were once enlightened... if they fall away, to renew them again...» Those who originated a religion based on deception and delusion clearly knew that if the conditioning broke down or wore off, it could not work again.

Not because I think he is a good Christian, in fact, given his knowledge of Satan's inner thoughts, he is likely to sit on his (Satan's) right hand side (a.k.a. the anti-Christ) but because if he is nominated, President Obama, the only true Christian amongst those running for the office of the Presidency of the United States in 2012, will win in a landslide.

If the resurrection is the true dénouement of the whole story and not a «happy ending» tacked on to a tragedy, then there is an element in the story itself which brings us to the frontiers of normal human experience, where experience runs out into mystery.

Atheism offers nothing to me, it never has and never will, it doesn't make me feel good or comfort me, it's not there for me when I'm sick or ill, it won't intervene in my times of need or protect me from hate, it doesn't care if I fail or succeed, it won't wipe the tears from my eyes, it does nothing when I have no where to run, it won't give me wise words or advice, it has no teaches for me to learn, it can't show me what's bad or nice, it's never inspired or excited anyone, it won't help me fulfill all my goals, it won't tell me to stop when I'm having fun, it's never saved one single soul, it doesn't take credit for everything I achieve, it won't make me get down on bended knee, it doesn't demand that I have to believe, it won't torture me for eternity, it won't teach me to hate or despise others, it won't tell me what's right or wrong, it can't tell nobody not to be lovers, it's told no one they don't belong, it won't make you think life is worth living, it has nothing to offer me, that's true, but the reason Atheism offers me nothing is because I've never asked it to, Atheism offers nothing because it doesn't need to, Religion promises everything because you want it to, You don't need a Religion or to have faith, You just want it because you need to feel safe, I want to feel reality and nothing more, Atheism offers me everything that Religion has stolen before.

I lived in UT for 2 years and Mormons are Christian... just a different sect of it and as far as if Chick - fil - a was run by Mormons it would be open on Sundays isn't true... EVERYTHING in closed on Sundays in UT.

That is, if a Jewish FBO runs an hour long, publicly funded computer skills training class that includes a one - minute prayer by the instructor at the beginning of class, that FBO is not engaging in «sectarian instruction»; it is simply being true to its character as a religious organization.

If you mean that we counter creationists arguments that evolution runs counter to the second law of thermodynamics by saying that that law only applies to heat transfer and randomness in a closed (gaseous) system, well, that is true.

If naturalism is true, then all branches of the sciences, evolutionary biology included, could in the long run be in serious trouble.

If it is true, as some of us believe, that the differences between Christians and Jews run deeper than is sometimes suggested, what does that mean for dialogue?

But do we not run the risk of being arbitrary and subjective if there is no way to tell true from false disclosures?

As a non-christian, for years, YEARS I wanted to know God and whether the message of the Bible was true or if it was just the writings of «holy» men and their speculations about God, but nobody I ran into could ever give me any good, objective reason for the hope that was within them.

If that system were true, blacks would still ride in the back of the bus, women would not have the vote, and we Protestants would have run all the Catholics back to Ireland a long time ago.

it had better be true, i've been running up some serious credit card bills if it's not true i'm screwed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

In a few cases this will undoubtedly be true, but if the general run of readers of the book — and it is not designed for specialists in the field — are anything at all like the students who, across the years, have enrolled in the writer's courses in the Bible, then it is fairly safe to assume that their knowledge of the book is not too extensive or detailed.

If you don't already have one, we suggest grabbing an inexpensive oven thermometer, just to ensure your oven temperature is running true.

If it's set to 170C then it could be your oven doesn't run true to temperature and you could try turning it up a bit.

That is, if a system produces a 57 % winning percentage over 2,000 games, mathematicians say that there is a 95 % chance that the results are true (results will be better than 55 % in the long - run).

This guy can't even make it in Bournemouth team, they play better without him.We have enough deadwoods in Arsenal team (all overpaid)- don't need another one.MU to buy him?Hard to believe, but if is it true, get the money and run fast, don't liok back.Add Ramsey on the package, for free, just to sweeten the deal!Please, from now on don't even remember Wilshere name, we have a lot bigger problems.He is excactly where he supposed to be-in a low team.As a reserve, on the bench, he's not even good enough for them.Time to get rid of the mediocrity in Arsenal team.All the «British core» must go, and fast.Let Wilshere become other team» svproblem, we have our own.

If Ramsey is in good form, then he must start, we can replace Rosicky at half time or 50 - 55 mins... I would leave Ozil / Cazorla to Le Prof, though he might choose both, I would start Walcott, because he can make runs in behind defences, just like in the Monaco game, only if he can improve his finishing for that match, Sanchez should carry on the passing game, and as a true winger, should provide crosses to Giroud just like Waloctt, because Giroud has great heading ability.If Ramsey is in good form, then he must start, we can replace Rosicky at half time or 50 - 55 mins... I would leave Ozil / Cazorla to Le Prof, though he might choose both, I would start Walcott, because he can make runs in behind defences, just like in the Monaco game, only if he can improve his finishing for that match, Sanchez should carry on the passing game, and as a true winger, should provide crosses to Giroud just like Waloctt, because Giroud has great heading ability.if he can improve his finishing for that match, Sanchez should carry on the passing game, and as a true winger, should provide crosses to Giroud just like Waloctt, because Giroud has great heading ability...

If I ever meet you personally, I will buy you so many drinks so we can drown our sorrows at how this corruptly run club continues to betray all us true fans.

If this is true then schneiderlin would be a very good signing IMO and we will then have two excellent holding midfielders le coq and morgan to rotate and also to play both of them in tough games like chelsea at bridge next season etc so he would be welcome addition otherwise go for kondogbia or wanyama tall tough strong physical players and they will give players like matic and yaya toure run for their money..

Possible rotations which wouldn't weaken the team significantly... Gab for Per Debuchy for Hector (if Debuchy is alright) Gibbs for Monreal Theo for Rambo (Theo can play as a true RW with Debuchy being restraint in his forward runs) Jack for Santi (Jack to do the Deep Lying role) Welbz for Sanchez (stick to the right... will support Gibbs on his forward runs) Rosicky for Ozil (TR7 is still an effective creator and adds bite to the midfield)

That Volquez has lost some sink and gained some run is generally true of the postseason, even if the effect is somewhat small.

Personally I am on the fence with this one, no idea if what you are saying is true but it's been entertaining and you certainly have given some of the old guard on this site a bit of a run for their money.

Theo is an expensive failure and to keep giving him the chance when he has repaid the clubs faith with being a bottler and acting as if he's a lazy git (watched him a number of seasons ago against Blackburn away and all he did was run up and down the wing without even calling for the ball to draw defenders away from the centre) I hate to say it but in my mind Alan Hansen was right when he said that «Walcott has not got a natural footballers brain» It infuriated me at the time but its been proven to be true I feel he's been collecting his money for too long without a result to justify keeping him in our employment.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

If Ross occasionally plays loose with the facts, he remains true to the core of the story, and many of the racetrack scenes evoke more sharply than ever before on film a sense of the surpassing grace and power of the running horse, the sound of rolling thunder of the hooves and a sense of the precarious, perilous nature of the jockeys» existence as they bound along hell - fired at 40 miles an hour, monkeys on a stick, wind - sheared and often screaming at each other in the din.

Chelsea looks to me like a true champion even if that's hard to swallow, on a good day Chelsea will run crystal Palace over in the first half but arsenal can only put 2 past them.

If this is true and Sanchez is sold before the season even ended it's just another example of how bad the club is run.

But if Ferrari improves and can sustain a front - running title challenge for Vettel this season, isn't the same also true for Kimi?