I think it is very shrewd of Taylor to remark that
if justification by faith alone had been the sole issue, it would have been possible for Protestants and Catholics to live together in relative peace.
Not exact matches
Pelikan summarized the Protestant way of putting the argument: «
If the Holy Trinity was just as holy as the Trinitarian dogma taught, and if original sin was as virulent as the Augustinian tradition said it was, and if Christ was as necessary as the Christological dogma implied, then the only way to treat justification in a manner faithful to the Catholic tradition was to teach justification by faith.&raqu
If the Holy Trinity was just as holy as the Trinitarian dogma taught, and
if original sin was as virulent as the Augustinian tradition said it was, and if Christ was as necessary as the Christological dogma implied, then the only way to treat justification in a manner faithful to the Catholic tradition was to teach justification by faith.&raqu
if original sin was as virulent as the Augustinian tradition said it was, and
if Christ was as necessary as the Christological dogma implied, then the only way to treat justification in a manner faithful to the Catholic tradition was to teach justification by faith.&raqu
if Christ was as necessary as the Christological dogma implied, then the only way to treat
justification in a manner faithful to the Catholic tradition was to teach
justification by faith.»
But
if believing results in
justification (as Rom 4:4 - 5 and Rom 10:10 a clearly show), then how could calling on the Lord and confessing with your mouth also result in
justification since such a person is already justified
by faith alone?
If one really believes in
justification by faith alone, differences over other matters — the real presence in the Eucharist, apostolic ministry, the indissolubility of marriage, the ordination of women, and on and on — make no difference.
What I am arguing in this post is that while
justification by faith alone is true,
if this is as far as a person goes, while they may be justified, they have not understood the gospel.
If it is entirely God, then clearly God has decided who will and will not have
faith and (according to
justification by faith) who will and will not be saved.
But — and this is a huge qualifier —
if that message of
justification by God's undeserved love is preached apart from an unmasking of the actual power relations which have aggravated these feelings to the level of a social neurosis;
if people are released from the rat race of upward mobility only privatistically, with no critique of the economic and social ideology that stimulates such desperate cravings;
if people are liberated from a bad sense of themselves without any sense of mission to change the conditions that waste human beings in such a way, then
justification by faith becomes a mystification of the actual power relations, and the Christian gospel is indeed the opiate of the masses.
The SCC determined that employers are required to act in good
faith towards their employees and, unless explicitly authorized
by the employment contract, employers can not place employees on leave, even
if paid, without providing legitimate business
justification.