Sentences with phrase «if lying on their back»

Women can figure out for themselves if lying on their back makes them uncomfortable, and avoid the practice if it does.

If you lie on your back and ask him to sit, he probably won't.

Not exact matches

Tamper with office chairs If someone is especially keen on lying back on their flexible office chair, there's always a chance they could leave themselves vulnerable to this exploit.

If I lie on the floor for a while, getting back up is no longer automatic; it's a process.

I intend to confine myself to the three points that preachers traditionally allow themselves (more aptly, perhaps, the three wishes that fairy - tale characters are always granted just before they are turned back into frogs) I wish, first of all, that one might avoid the statistical traps that lie in the path if one relies too much on changing church membership figures — in this case the figures that are supposed to show drastic decline and weakening in oldline Protestantism since the 1960s.

If they could only have cast their minds further back, perhaps they might have recalled a lost paradise: green and yellow meadows stirred by tender winds, umbrageous forests and emerald groves, glass - blue mountain peaks melting into azure skies, glittering bays whose diamond waters break in jade and turquoise surges on sands like powdered alabaster — where the rain falls gently, and is transformed by the setting sun into shimmering curtains of gold — where, beyond verdant valleys and limestone caves, lies a palace filled with every delight the senses can endure, enclosing garden courtyards where crystal fountains splash in porphyry basins, intoxicating perfumes hang upon the breezes, undying flowers of every hue shine out amid the greenery's blue shadows...

As it is pried up, say by a lever, from a position in which it lies on surface A, for instance, it will linger for a time unstably halfway up, and if the lever cease to urge it, it will tumble back or «relapse» under the continued poll of gravity.

As for Rev Parsons, saying god exists is the equivalent of lying when it can't back its claims with substantial evidence... neither it or just spewin» can be trusted on their opinion... if they really believe in this god, then they have sinned and are both destined for their fairy land land of hell.

It's difficult to blame Ozil for the difficulties he's faced at Arsenal without looking at the big picture... like the fans, he too was lied to by Wenger... there is no doubt in my mind that he was told by Wenger that he was trying desperately to recreate our earlier success by acquiring players that fit the system he ran when Henry was in his prime... as we know this hasn't happened... in order for Ozl to flourish he needs some speed up front, forwards that can make intelligent runs, a boss in the midfield to compensate for his obvious defensive liabilities and defenders who can transition from defence to offence quickly and efficiently... much like he had in Real and with the German National squad... unfortunately he ended up on a squad that has a striker who plays with his back to goal, very few intelligent runs into the box, minus Sanchez, no one to take pressure off him in the midfield, once Cazorla was injured, average defensive midfielders around him, which simply highlighted his lacking defensive qualities and defenders who lack the necessary cutting edge when it comes to transitional passing... instead of blaming Ozil, which is simply too easy, especially considering his mopey disposition, we should be asking ownership and / or Wenger why they brought him in if they didn't intend on doing what was necessary to get the best from him... can you imagine Ozil playing with the likes of Henry, Viera, Petit and Pires, it would be incredibly to watch and even more difficult to stop... so the only thing different between his experiences in Real and with the German team versus his time at Arsenal are the players around him and we all know who is in charge of making those decisions, the Grinch who stole soccer

Sanchez — by far the most threatening player on our team, especially considering that Ozil has never been a goal scoring machine throughout his career... wished he and the team had dealt with the whole situation in a much better fashion because even if he end up staying his time here will always be tainted by the memories of this year... Wenger has always hated confrontation but this isn't like the crazy years of Bendner or even the back - and - forth that he would have experienced with leaders like Viera or Keown, this was a battle between a guy with a lust for winning versus a manager who had lied about being the same

Cazorla — too bad he was lost too soon... not blinded enough to think he would solve all of our ills but he was and is the only deep - lying player on this team that can pass more than 12 yards on a consistent basis... like Rosicky, gone way too soon but can't dwell on it too long or we end up in the crazy world of Wenger's man love for the one and only Diaby... don't resign because even if he were to come back he's been out to long and he just gives Wenger an excuse to not replace with talent

LYING ON HIS back, gazing up at a bluebird sky framed by the oval of Michigan Stadium, Corey Lynch wondered if any of this was really happening.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

wenger has made the club profit this window i would have though as well all incomings have been covered out goings and other revenues coming in like c / l monies and squad releases wages being saved i bet we are in a + balance if we went through it properly we do nt know what the budget is so it could be worst there now way wenger has spend # 100 not even # 70 million transfers ospina = covered by the sales of miquel and monies made from cesc to chelsea so nothing really spend there debuchy = covered by the vela money chambers = covered by the vermalen sale # 11 million only goes up to # 16 if he does well in certain circumstances sanchez = covered by the c / l monies and no doubt what we are owed on previous player sales i.e cesc to barca and song monies still outstanding welbeck = covered by wages being freed up and the rest of outgoing transactions and previous player sales being owed so there we have most likely recoup most if not all of our transfer monies back and shafted and lied to puma and the emirates about spending there monies in sponsorship on tranfers and pocketing in» profit» aprox # 60 - 70 million of the transfer funds to boot wenger hang your head in shame

The game should have been killed off in the first half, we got ta learn to park the bus and not put ourselves under needless pressure, a good game but Arsenal still lacking at the back, if we had drawn or lost, that fault lies well and truly at our defence, Good to have Walcott back and a great goal, but all of that would have been wasted, anyway well done our boys, shame about the PL losers our gain, bring on the final!

In Wenger's traditional 4 -2-3-1 formation, Lemar could either take over Cazorla's role as the deeper - lying playmaker with a licence to roam forward or play on the left wing, but if Wenger decides to stick with the formation he finished last season with, three at the back, Lemar might struggle to displace Mesut Ozil and Alexis Sanchez as one of the two attacking midfielders, however, that might change if one or both players leave the club.

Absolute joke with the sale of ox and Gibbs we have made money gazidis wenger lied to are faces again we have some extremely wealthy men at are club and Stan is on about spending 3 billion on the rams for a new ground if any one still backs these muppets it's time for u to get out of are club with them if it means I have to take a banner every week to get these idiots out that's what I'll do bring back David dean please

He knew that if he failed this time, if he didn't play well enough on the Penn Circuit to get back up to the Grand Prix, it meant that he would turn out like his father: teaching country - club ladies in dainty dresses, lying to them that their backhands looked improved....

Centre - back and goalkeeping futures still also lie in the balance, as Chris Smalling — who has emerged as a leader at the back — could find his position under threat if another addition were to arrive, while Blind will be sweating on game time when a natural left - sided defender in the shape of Marcos Rojo returns to full match fitness.

Oh, wait just a second... that lion has turned into a big pussy cat who if you tickle his belly will just roll over and lie on their backs.

You can encourage your baby to crawl for a few laps and try to pump (like pedaling a bicycle while lying on the back) your baby's legs if she is not crawling yet.

At around 6 to 8 weeks, if he's especially strong and coordinated, he'll raise his head while lying on his back.

If you have a boy, it might be a good idea to put a piece of dry cloth on top of his penis if he is lying on his bacIf you have a boy, it might be a good idea to put a piece of dry cloth on top of his penis if he is lying on his bacif he is lying on his back.

Week.3: your baby will start to move much more and you should encourage them to stretch out and eel their limbs by lying them on a play mat on either their front or back; if the mat has noises and lights, this will encourage them to respond to them and turn their head towards them.

If you don't like what is served at school, pack a lunch for your children. Parents should be responsible enough to pack a lunch. They are lying on the lunch applications. Parents don't need to provide any documentation when they fill out the lunch applications. PACK A LUNCH if you don't like what the government is providing to your children or go back to your countrIf you don't like what is served at school, pack a lunch for your children. Parents should be responsible enough to pack a lunch. They are lying on the lunch applications. Parents don't need to provide any documentation when they fill out the lunch applications. PACK A LUNCH if you don't like what the government is providing to your children or go back to your countrif you don't like what the government is providing to your children or go back to your country.

If lying sideways to feed does not help, try lying flat, or almost flat, on your back with the baby lying on top of you to nurse.

Some moms almost faint if they lie down on their back or at least they become very uncomfortable and dizzy.

If you lie down flat on your back, you might even be able to feel it yourself by pressing gently just above your pelvis bone.

Spend sometime lying on your back outside under the stars one night — on a week - end if your child usually goes to bed early — and marvel at the countless number of them, made by our Creator.

It is so comfortable that it means I don't wake up with back ache from lying - down night feeds, and it's softer on my head if I have to ditch the pillows due to close proximity of a small child.

I got back on the birth stool to see if we could really harness the need to push, and then we tried side lying again, and then I tried squatting in the doorway.

If you are lying on your back on your bed or couch, you can lay your baby on her tummy on your chest.

They can cover your baby's face — even if she is lying on her back.

Babies who are a month or so old can not sit even so they are tended to if they can lie on the seat in a laid back position.

i'm glad that you had satisfying hospital births and received the care you and your babies needed, but i do think that we as women should know that we have other options besides a hospital birth or that we can have a water birth or that we don't have to lie on our backs (the worst position for birthing) as some doctors require, if that's what we so choose.

If you wake up and realize you're lying on your back, it's all right; flip over to your left side and go back to sleep.

Lie your baby on her back and move her little legs as if she were riding a bicycle.

If the baby becomes restless while lying on his tummy, lay him on his back and allow him to sleep for a while or get him involved in some other activity.

If lying sideways to feed does not help, try lying flat on your back with the baby lying on top of you to nurse.

If you want, you can try lying on your back after sex, bending your knees and tilting your pelvis backward at a 45 - degree angle for 30 minutes, which may help hold in the semen.

If you hate laboring in bed on your back, make it known that you won't take it lying down.

What to do: While your baby is lying on her back, hold the toy in front of her face and, if needed, wiggle it slowly or gently touch her with it to get her attention.

One of the most important things to be aware of is how difficult clothes might be to put on a squirming baby, for instance clothing that fastens around the lower back and bottom can be difficult to do up and if there are large buttons or bows around the middle back these may be quite uncomfortable for the baby to sit or lie against making them irritable.

If you feel this, avoid lying and sleeping on the back and crossing your legs.

If you feel the need to help let some belly bubbles out, lie baby on their side and give their back a pat.

If she likes this activity, try it again but lying on her back this time.

You'll probably be comfier if you're reclining gently rather than lying flat on your back.

This breastfeeding position involves your baby lying on his back, while you crouch over him on all fours and dangle your nipple in his mouth.4 Some mums say doing this for short periods helps if they have conditions like mastitis and don't want their breasts to be squashed or touched; others claim that gravity helps unplug blocked milk ducts, although there's no scientific evidence to support this yet.

She will lift it in transition to tummy / back, but I can't remember specifically if she can lie on her side with her head up.

In such a case, would it not be better to allow gravity, i.e; the birth mother standing and moving whilst in labour, to take charge rather than the birthing mother instead lying on her back in an ambulance and then hospital along with the accompanying substantial increase in stress levels?I suppose all I am trying to say is that IF my partner and I were to have a second baby, I really would like to support my partner once more in having a home birth.