Sentences with phrase «if more explanation»

Not exact matches

He or she may be flattered by the amount of respect you have and be more forgiving than if you left without explanation or made up a flimsy excuse.

«If you're wondering why marketers seem intent on e-mailing you more and more,» McKinsey states, «there's a simple explanation: it works.»

If you're looking for a more in - depth explanation of blockchain tech, I might be so bold as to recommend Fortune's «Blockchain Mania!»

A little explanation for your requested figure can go a long way, especially if you're asking for more than market price for the position.

If you are looking for a more advanced explanation that is suited for wealthy individuals and professional investors, I wrote about this same topic on my personal blog awhile ago in a post called How a Holding Company Works.

(Search this site for articles on Risk in investment if you want more, or see my comments on the attempt last year to Debunk Buffett by applying fully half - a-dozen «explanations» to his results.

For example, if you're catering to an advanced horseback rider in your ebook compared to a beginner, that content might lend itself to more in - depth explanation of certain topics than content suitable for a beginner, who may prefer bullet point summaries of the topic.

If Romney doesn't explain to people why things will be okay if those policies are implemented, then all people will have is Obama's explanation that Romney will take away your health care and retirement (and trade in Granma's health care for coupons) so that Romney's Bain friends can make even more moneIf Romney doesn't explain to people why things will be okay if those policies are implemented, then all people will have is Obama's explanation that Romney will take away your health care and retirement (and trade in Granma's health care for coupons) so that Romney's Bain friends can make even more moneif those policies are implemented, then all people will have is Obama's explanation that Romney will take away your health care and retirement (and trade in Granma's health care for coupons) so that Romney's Bain friends can make even more money.

No different than my rambling post agreeing with him and providing even more real life human scenarios that can evoke strong emotions, that can easily cause someone to either A: Seek out religion, even if it's only for some semblance of accepttion and / or explanation of the unknown, or B: If they already have a religion, re-embracing it with new enthusiasif it's only for some semblance of accepttion and / or explanation of the unknown, or B: If they already have a religion, re-embracing it with new enthusiasIf they already have a religion, re-embracing it with new enthusiasm.

Yep, but if you don't have any more variables than I have and you reject logic and you just make up explanations that have no supporting evidence your chances of being right are even less than mine.

If you want a longer and more detailed explanation of why God hardened Pharaoh's heart, check out my new book: The Re-Justification of God.

This particularly needs explanation because Pilate would not have hesitated to slaughter bystanders if he thought it necessary to preserve order (he did so more than once).

Why do you people think that if an explanation can not given, claiming «god did it» makes any more sense than claiming «Bigfoot did it»?

Russ, you said, «while it is a «huge leap» (as you say) to claim the specificity of the Judeo - Christian God in this particular finding, how is it not * equally * (if not more so) a leap to filter out the concept of transcendence (which you call a «self - contained oxymoron»), without any alternate explanation for the paradoxical «something out of nothing» origins of our universe?»

while it is a «huge leap» (as you say) to claim the specificity of the Judeo - Christian God in this particular finding, how is it not * equally * (if not more so) a leap to filter out the concept of transcendence (which you call a «self - contained oxymoron»), without any alternate explanation for the paradoxical «something out of nothing» origins of our universe?

If you can't understand my explanation above and see that as an attempt at discrediting, without pointing out where exactly it's wrong, then there isn't much more I can do, other than hope one day you'll learn something.

If you are really able to do more than «chip away» at cosmology and evolution, then provide a superior explanation of «divine orchestration» in at least same the level of detail as natural processes you are calling inadequate.

If this is all that is said, an explanation is given (in the sense of course in which metaphysical statements aim at «explaining» anything) of the aspect in which the act is more, but not how the act founded and sustained in that way, is not only the act of the finite being because it is received in it, as Aquinas puts it, but also because it is posited by it as a cause.

If the conservative churches are producing more personal religious vitality than the others, the explanation is not likely to be found in one quarter only.

More precisely, it says that, if one cause provides a sufficient explanation for any event, any other causal explanation is ruled out, unless that second explanation is simply an aspect of the first or reducible to it.

If you get a bit of time and want a more detailed explanation (of the Word of God being much more than «just the Bible»), then listen to this class on the subject.

In other words, Ogden's analysis of various descriptions of experience is informed by two distinctions, both of which apply to the noetic pole of experience: a twofold distinction between nonsensuous and sensory modes of experience and a threefold distinction of what Whitehead calls «the feeling of the ego, the others, the totality,» that is, of self, other, and whole (PP 84).8 This comprehensive hermeneutical grid then permits an explanation of what he claims is a «sense of ourselves and others as of transcendent worth,» as precisely an «awareness of ourselves and the world as of worth to God» (PP 86f) Y Ogden notes that such an evidently theistic explanation is not open to empirical or experiential confirmation on either of the two more restrictive descriptions which, as he observes, must either «refer the word God» to some merely creaturely reality or process of interaction, or else., must deny it all reference whatever by construing its meaning as wholly noncognitive,» if they seek experiential illustration for such a sense at all (PP 80) 10

If explaining a state of affairs consists in substituting for a lesser known object ones which are more accessible and familiar, and in then explaining them, the objects of knowledge can be discriminated by the extent to which they lend themselves to this rule of explanation.7 That is, they can be discriminated by the extent to which explaining them can be meaningfully replaced by explaining something else without thereby explaining away just what was to be explained.

Also, if you want a better explanation of those seven truths, I delve into each one a little more deeply in my course, the Gospel According to Scripture.

Christian protology / eschatology is more properly a cosmogony, i.e., an explanation of the origin and purpose of the world system, which must, in the nature of the case, come from beyond the system if it exists at all.

If, e.g., as sometimes happens, the man, after a time, more or less, recovers the faculties of which the injury to his brain had deprived him, and that not in consequence of a renewal of the injured part, but in consequence of the inhibited functions being performed by the vicarious action of other parts, the easiest explanation certainly is that, after a time, consciousness constitutes the remaining parts into a mechanism capable of acting as a substitute for the lost parts.

And even if it were the case that in the past we spent less time defending and discussing specific dogmas, there seems to me to be a much more plausible explanation than «no one really used to care about dogma», which is this: it's not that we didn't care about dogma, but rather that the truths of faith have come under unprecedented scrutiny and attack in the modern period, not least fromdissenters within the Church, so it has become essential that we do talk about what we actually believe.

If a simpler explanation exists the burden is on the persons supporting the more complicated explanation to show that the simple explanation does not work.

If a new theory offers a simpler explanation which explains more phenomena, and is superior in other ways to other theories, then eventually it will be adopted, that is if there are enough people who are willing to abandon their dogma and recognize the superiority of the new theorIf a new theory offers a simpler explanation which explains more phenomena, and is superior in other ways to other theories, then eventually it will be adopted, that is if there are enough people who are willing to abandon their dogma and recognize the superiority of the new theorif there are enough people who are willing to abandon their dogma and recognize the superiority of the new theory.

If our models are to lead us to ask, and seek answers for, new questions about the world, we must regard them as something more than «logical superfluities», «illicit attempts at explanation», «convenient fictions», or the like.

If you're craving a more detailed explanation, I found a great link for you at The Whole Grains Council.

See this CNN article for a good explanation or check out my article about natural flavors if you want to learn more.

If you want to get more in - depth explanation, you can read about the difference between sweet potatoes and yams here (spoiler alert — they really are completely different species, but what we have in U.S. are all sweet potatoes — just labeled wrongfully as «yams»), or watch a nice little video here.

Ingredients I would deem unacceptable: egg whites (even if you carefully source those eggs, you don't want to poison your guests, and if you do, there are certainly far more effective methods); overproof spirits (you don't want your guests asking to curl up for a nap before dinner); marshmallow -, bubblegum - or cake - flavored vodka (no explanation should be necessary here).

he sure owes fans some explanation but am not holding my breath and I will not be surprised if hw pulls the same stunt once more, the man is completely out of touch with reality...

If my explanation still sounds foolish, then I am more than foolish indeed!

My only explanation is that maybe they'd rather gamble on the draft pick and try to assure more playoffs success than they'd likely have if they won the game.

If we lose, they point fingers and dismiss anyone coming with a more than reasonable explanation.

I understand hating the use of the «excuse» line in a general sense, but (as with everything else in the world) it's important to apply context and see if your «excuse» is actually just more of an «explanation.»

But if the two teams can't agree to new terms, Boston is in for an awkward round of explanations to Thomas and Jae Crowder, and the Cavs will field 20 or more calls for Irving all over again.

That said, I do agree on the signings point — my main argument is that if you believe we need them then an explanation of why and how this would change the squad would be more enjoyable to read than a simple statement of facts and then an opinion without analysis.

Although we have a theoretical explanation (putting more growth factors into an injured area), it is unclear what, if anything, is actually occurring on a more microscopic level.

I'll try to flesh this out a bit more, but please keep in mind that there are many dynamics that are interrelated here that would require explanation if given the time and space.

You can also read some of recommended potty training books if you want more detailed explanation about the topic.

While your child doesn't owe anyone any explanations, helping her develop a script to respond to questions can help her feel more comfortable if she chooses to respond.

If you want to see this explanation of the brain and learn more about the science behind «flipping your lid», watch Dr. Daniel Siegel's youtube video.

However, if you want to learn more about the super-cool art of hand - dyeing or hand - batiking our wraps undergo for their vibrant beauty, click here for photos and explanations!

I wonder if this may be part of the explanation for the more serious social and psychological problems of various kinds the modern world seems to be saddled with.

If I had one criticism it would be less explanation and more recipes,

«If Interim Healthcare is unable to respond to any inquiry in full, please provide all available responsive information and a detailed explanation as to why a more complete response is not possible,» Lucas wrote.