Sentences with phrase «if necessary that point»

Not exact matches

If the amount of stuff you have, particularly the kind that's desirable but not entirely necessary, seems excessive in relation your income, it probably points to some level of financial instability.

The whole point of automation is to increase your current abilities, but if your staff doesn't have the necessary skill set to perform new tasks, you may need to consider additional or different staffing.

Guided by the customer profile that's developed, determine if the various touch points provide the necessary service and information.

However, we have been getting jerked around by the SBA for nearly 9 months now and we are at a point where we may have to cut our losses if we can not secure the remainder of necessary funding in the very near future.

If you can't contribute something honest, kind or necessary, there's really no point in offering your two bits.

: Schools, published in December by Bishop Patrick O'Donoghue of Lancaster, the actual text of which many of you will already have acquired, the reaction to which, however, — both hostile and the reverse — needs also to be registered as part of its necessary import: for, there is not much point in being a Sign of Contradiction if nobody notices, and the secular reaction to a subversive religion like Catholicism is part of its authentic meaning.

The point is that they would not be necessary if there were no danger of Christians presenting their members to sin or allowing sin to reign in their mortal bodies.

At this point it is necessary to gain some clarity by problematizing what are normally taken to be simple binaries — clear and seemingly self - evident — like oppressor - oppressed and attempt to see if this almost taken - for - granted polarities are what have been responsible for the lack of progress in our quest for peace and reconciliation.

Perhaps this is the proper test for all parables: if the ornamentation is not necessary for the parable to make its points, then that portion of it should be eliminated.

Further, in using the term «possible,» I want to emphasize the point that whatever conditions are relevant to creative acts, these conditions are not guarantees, but at best are necessary if not sufficient for occurrences of radical creativity.

At such a point a writer would have no reason for believing that he was misleading his readers if he referred to the resurrection within the context of a story which seemed to him to be a necessary corollary of the Easter event.

His main point is to focus upon paragraph 15 of Humanae Vitae (HV) which states «the Church does not consider at all illicit the use of those therapeutic means necessary to cure bodily diseases, even if a foreseeable impediment to procreation should result there from — provided such impediment is not directly intended.»

I am not calling for cuts to government programs as of now — they are necessary for so many people's basic survival — but Mr. Beck does have a pertinent point: voting to tax someone else (typically wealthier than us) to provide assistance does not necessarily demonstrate a society that «cares» — much more caring is a society that willingly donates those funds to charities they have taken the time to research, and more caring still if the members of that society take the time to volunteer to administer that aid.

It was, of course, necessary, if he kept his readers with him all the way, to come to his point obliquely.

However, although I don't see how this could be argued successfully, the key point again is that such an argument is necessary if the challenges in question are to have any force.

Both camps will cry «foul» and say you have to pick one or other other, but this may not be necessary if you can accept various points of both groups and — here's the key — follow Jesus in loving others.

Dying to self is never pretty and painless, but it's necessary if we're to step out of the way and point people to Christ.

If ever so many thousands of years have intervened, if the fact came to entail ever so many consequences, it does not on that account become more necessary (and the consequences themselves, from an ultimate point of view, are only relatively necessary, since they derive from the freely effecting cause); to say nothing of the topsy - turvy notion that the fact might become necessary by reason of the consequences, the consequences being wont to seek their ground in something else, and not to constitute a ground for that of which they are the consequenceIf ever so many thousands of years have intervened, if the fact came to entail ever so many consequences, it does not on that account become more necessary (and the consequences themselves, from an ultimate point of view, are only relatively necessary, since they derive from the freely effecting cause); to say nothing of the topsy - turvy notion that the fact might become necessary by reason of the consequences, the consequences being wont to seek their ground in something else, and not to constitute a ground for that of which they are the consequenceif the fact came to entail ever so many consequences, it does not on that account become more necessary (and the consequences themselves, from an ultimate point of view, are only relatively necessary, since they derive from the freely effecting cause); to say nothing of the topsy - turvy notion that the fact might become necessary by reason of the consequences, the consequences being wont to seek their ground in something else, and not to constitute a ground for that of which they are the consequences.

M.M. Thomas points out, «While technological advance, agricultural and industrial development and modernisation of social structures are necessary they accentuate the pathological exploitative characteristics of traditional society by destroying their traditional humanising aspects, if traditional power - structures and the social institutions in which they are embodied remain unchanged.»

You correctly point out that if turning from sin is a requirement for salvation then our works are a necessary part of salvation; but I would go further and say that an unbeliever simply can not change their minds about sin.

But at some indefinable point in there, the suffering can trip a switch if we are not careful and it becomes necessary for self - validation.

Whatever, if anything, may be necessary to regulate electronic communication, I hope we won't reach the point of enacting a law requiring all «personalized» messages to begin with the disclaimer: «Caution.

Liberals believe that the most important of these procedures is the machinery of rationality, of those laws of logic attached to no agenda or vision, but sufficiently general in their scope as to provide a normative perspective from the vantage point of which any agenda or vision can be assessed and, if necessary, corrected.

I would reaffirm my agreement with Hartshorne on the absolutely essential point that the ontological argument, properly understood, asserts that God's existence is either necessary or impossible and, since there are no other alternatives, the argument can not be discussed as if it involved merely the alternative of existence or nonexistence.

At this point, here is where you will need to check the batter, and adjust if necessary by adding more soda water.

[At this point, you can feed the remaining starter if necessary.]

At this point check the taste and add more fish sauce or lime juice if necessary.

Add the cream cheese and Italian seasoning and stir until melted, lowering heat at any point if necessary.

Taste and adjust seasoning as necessary — you can also remove the rosemary and bay leaf at this point if you wish.

My point though is that it's not necessary to regularly feed a starter that you keep in the fridge if you are not getting ready to bake bread.

«Investing in more speed and capacity than is necessary not only increases costs today without a corresponding benefit but it also adds the risk that if and when projected growth is achieved, the once modern machinery may be worn to the point that repair or replacement is needed or worse, it may be made obsolete by new technology.

Adjust the heat, if necessary, to keep the water just at the simmer point.

Add 1 - 2 tablespoons of water if necessary to bind it at this point and mix one more time.

The ecommerce market continues to expand as consumer demand increases for a digital point - of - sale, convenient product delivery and an effortless return, if necessary.

From this point on, every time the squash goes in the oven, you'll always want to keep a close eye on things to make sure that the yummy syrup at the bottom of the pan doesn't burn; if you have to, add a few tablespoons of water to the pan, as and when necessary.

If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again

But I don't think the unhealthy coping would have been necessary if he had experienced adversity at some point in his life and taught to deal with it in a healthy and constructive manner.

nice to see you crawl out of your hole just in time to offer your 2 cents worth once again... unlike yourself I started following this team long before Wenger arrived on the scene and will continue to do so long after he's gone... in his earlier years I admired the cerebral elements he brought to the EPL, which at that point was more brutish than beautiful, and I respected the seemingly tireless efforts of Arsene, Dein & staff to uncover and develop talent without sacrificing the product on the field... likewise I appreciated that such a youthful manager wasn't afraid to bring strong personalities and / or world - class players into the fold without being fearful of how said players would potentially undermine and / or dilute his authority... unfortunately this all changed about 10 years ago and culminated in the removal of all our greatest players, both young and old, without any real replacements coming in... from Henry to RVP to Fabergas and Nasri, it was easy to see that this club was no longer interested in competing at the highest levels... instead of being honest, minus the ridiculous claims regarding the new stadium, Wenger chose to side with management and in doing so became the «front man» for this corporation pretending to be a world - class soccer club... without the «front man» this organization would have been exposed numerous years earlier, so his presence was imperative if the facade was to continue... it's for this reason and more that I despise what this once great man and Kroenke has done to my beloved club... the gutless, shameful and manipulative way they have treated the fans, like myself, is largely indefensible and this is why I felt it necessary to start offering my opinion in a public format... trust me, I resisted the temptation for many years but as long as the same shit continues to exist I will voice my opinions and if you don't like it maybe you should look for a different team to pretend to follow

OTOH i think we could get 3 points and let welbeck / walcott / ramsey get better & give ozil / welbeck a rest: welbeck [giroud on 60th min if necessary] sanchez, caz, walcott ramsey coq gibbs gabriel per bellerin ospina

Even if you ignore the ridiculous expense necessary to build dikes around the whole city, there's no plausible way at this point to prevent rising seas from penetrating the porous limestone underneath the city and infiltrating its fresh water supply.

And only if they failed to take three points this weekend would they feel it necessary to rush Suarez back for what would then be a key clash against Roy Hodgson's side.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

That's enough to gain the superlicense necessary to compete in F1, and if they don't win, they have to accumulate 40 points over a three - year period.

McKillop says his motion offense is flexible enough that Curry doesn't need to be a pass - first point guard like Richards, and he also reserves the right to move Curry back to his old position if necessary.

If it becomes necessary, Bellerin maybe brought on to replace him at a point in the game to have some game time ahead of the Zagreb game.

All we have is Europa, it is not necessary to point out to everyone the difference between the comps, it is not necessary to say which one Arsenal needs to be in if we are gonna be taken serious again.

As Sobel and others pointed out, the tour requires a player who bags it mid-round to provide a medical reason for his egress, while no such explanation is necessary if the golfer finishes and posts his score.

They should be playing for the club and fans, but having stated that if the situation is as toxic as what we are led to believe, in that there is no guidance from a coaching point of view, then the players downing tools to force necessary change may be understandable.

Even if the teams ahead of them didn't gain another point on the year they'd be unlikely to pick up the necessary seven points in their remaining six games.

Blues will no doubt be reluctant to throw absolutely everything necessary at the win tonight, as the boys in blue will aim to put on a good show at Home, where Blues have gained 88 % if their points so far this season.