Sentences with phrase «if none of the arguments»

Rather, he thinks that belief in God is rational even if none of the arguments (even Swinburne's) for God's existence succeeds.

But if none of these arguments convince you, then look at one simple fact.

Not exact matches

Some may argue this comparison is too simplistic and «apples to oranges» but the annual terawatt hour consumption figures persist none the less, and Bitcoin costs roughly 10x more energy than CERN Meanwhile, most, if not all of us will probably find it very difficult to demonstrate a cost / utility argument in support of Bitcoin having 10x more benefit than CERN.

I know of none of my atheist friends who celebrate Easter with bunnies and eggs and know of no Christians who don't except maybe the JW's, but for the sake of argument I will concede that if they do then yes, they are also co-opting a pagan holiday.

It is also unjustified — none of the arguments advanced to keep them hold water and even if you believe that Bishops have something important to add to debate, that is not a sufficient reason why they should have special reserved places rather than come through the same appointments producer as anyone else.

You can challenge it with properly thought out and published arguments if you stumble upon an alternative theory and people aren't going to suppress you, but if you use arguments like «I went home and didn't see a spider on my floor, didn't see any cells and electrons floating around, didn't feel my ground moving, and didn't see my dog morphing into a cat, therefore none of the above exists» then you're going to get laughed at.

If you think that the climate debate is dominated by arguments related to cultural values and not science, indeed you seem to imply this, then it seems you're broadly in agreement with all my posts including this one, none of which advocate or defend any physical climate science or data from any side in the debate.

If none of the above, perhaps you might like take time from you busy schedule of doing «libertarian - conservative chemistry» to respond to the substance of my argument — to wit, that there is every reason to expect those who publish most actively to have the best understanding of a field.

I would agree with Mr Dukes that none of those criteria apply to an interim care order — but the problem in his argument is that Article 5 only applies if the Court agree with him that an interim care order is depriving a child of their liberty [Spoiler alert — the Court do not]

California's argument would fare better if there were a longstanding tradition in this country of specially restricting children's access to depictions of violence, but there is none.