Not exact matches
If TV shows hadn't given him so much coverage, or had challenged his erroneous statements more directly, or
pointed out his
obvious flaws as a president, would that have changed anything?
When customers are opting to spend twice as much to buy an Apple laptop than an HP, it's time to massively shake up that business or get out of it entirely (by the way, I'm not sure
if anybody has
pointed out the
obvious yet, but it sure seems like Microsoft Windows is at the core of HP's problem in this area).
There's some chance that we'll find out
if the lawyers are right, since Dan Loeb's Third
Point Capital, which owns 9.62 percent of Sotheby's, is running a proxy fight to elect three directors and shake up management, and is the
obvious target of Sotheby's 10 - percent - trigger poison pill, today filed a lawsuit to get rid of that pill.
Given all this, Kugel,
if I read him correctly, opts for treating the Scriptures as the starting
point for a continuous process of interpretation and reinterpretation rather than as statements that are true in themselves in any
obvious sense.
Finally, someone else
points out the
obvious:
If women don't like the rules of the school, don't go there!
The
obvious problem of dealing with such contrasts in the linear form of narrative can be alleviated by
pointing out explicitly what sorts or contrasts are being integrated, so that even
if readers lose sight of the particular information involved, they can still appreciate the aesthetic transformation of elements.
He takes offense on behalf of all men
if I «criticize» — when all I think I'm doing is
pointing out the bleedingly
obvious.
If I seem to be overstressing a
point that is
obvious and banal, it is because I know some «violent Christians» who do not at all take the attitude described above.
If you read through Mark it is
obvious that it
points to the resurrection in many places.
But
if this were the case, then the
point of the parable must have been comparatively
obvious and simple to grasp, that is, to and for men who stood in the situation of the hearers of Jesus.
It should be
pointed out, perhaps, that for the first fifty years or so of quantum chemistry, the results of theoretical calculations were uniformly poor and unhelpful; but this tended to be put off to the enormous complexity of the mathematical techniques —
if only these could be overcome, it was thought, it would become
obvious how wonderfully we could depict the results of chemical reactivity and bonding simply by applying calculations to the known constituents.
I don't pretend to know all the «why's», but it is
obvious if you read Job's defense of himself to his friends, he was at the
point of death and still defending his righteousness.
If, as I suggested in the last section, the
obvious and oft - noted differences between Russell and Whitehead symbolize the current analytic - speculative split, then the kinds of similarities and (perhaps even more importantly) the areas of mutual influence, indebtedness, and philosophic enrichment to which Professor Kuntz rightly
points can suggest to contemporary philosophers a neutral «dialogical territory» beyond the present, hostile philosophic «demilitarized zone,» which is no longer itself viable, interesting, or worthy of the vocation of philosophy.
I guess I have reached a
point that,
if it can't be backed up with such
obvious scientific evidence, then it is not important enough for me to accept it as a fact... yet... even
if I would like for it to be true.
Cyprian makes the
obvious point that clothing can not become ruddy
if water alone is present in the wine vat, and goes on to emphasise the link between the grapes being trampled upon and the blood of Christ, which could not have been produced unless Christ «had first been trodden upon and pressed.»
So
obvious, therefore, does it appear to us that suffering is woven into the very fabric of creation and that the mark of rank in nature is capacity for pain, that a difficult tour de force of historic imagination is demanded
if we are to understand the Old Testament's
point of view.
Now, as a Presbyterian, I have no personal stake in the doctrinal position or discipline of the Roman Church, beyond the
obvious point that,
if she were to change on same - sex unions, it would make the fight for religious liberty much more difficult for all of us.
If I was the creator — I'd wonder about the humans I created — it seems
obvious they missed the
point of the whole visit to planet.
And in support of this, one may
point to the
obvious necessity of a constitutional body of instruction and control, a concrete,
if initially simple, code of incorporation for the people.
If I may
point out the
obvious, this is a belief.
I hate to
point out the
obvious but we are ALL sinners and
if you think about it we sin every 30 seconds or so realistically.
Putting food on the table is an
obvious highlight
point of the day for someone like myself and no doubt someone like you as well
if you find yourself here with frequency (waves hi).
Maybe this is an
obvious point to you, especially
if you follow the Braves closely.
Right — May have been
pointing out the
obvious by predicting Martial wouldn't be in the game, but
if you hadn't heard the recent news, you likely saved yourself a zero score.
Nice of you to try and
point to numbers as
if it takes away from what is glaringly
obvious to many a fan.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute...
if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was
obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season,
if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some
points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit...
if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon,
if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
but the way i see it is that
if we wait till Deadline Day we will Probably sign 1 Player (a Striker or a CDM) when in this case we actually Need Both!!!!!! Theres no
Point in signing Suarez on Deadline Day and yet leave the
obvious CDM Position empty... just like we've been doing for the past years... We signed Özil on Deadline Day and that was it...... which shows that when you sign a Big Player on the last Day thats most likely going to be the only Business you do.
All in all our issues run deep... Walcott playing more (Why
if he is not scoring
obvious freebies) or should I say scoring more is one of them... Will we buy I don't know but
if we do it doesn't look like will get a WC player but a 2nd, 3 rd or 4th option on Wenger's list &
if we do get a WC player most likely he will be overpriced even more than what we would have paid had we done the right things (4th
point).
But there is no
point me saying what everyone thinks is
obvious, so
if I had to say which two will be more of a danger, I pick spu and liv.
That is the most
obvious priority that will cost us some
points if Arsene doesn't sign someone fast...
And as for Jon Fox and myself being Pals?We have never met never spoken and never corresponded.We share a common hatred of Arsene Wenger.We also share a long time support of Arsenal Football Club.That is it.There are many many others who post their thoughts and feelings on this site who feel the same way about Wenger and the hierarchy of this club as we do.It would be very very easy to rip your comments to shreds but I simply refuse to waste time
pointing out the
obvious to you other than to say
if your «posts» carried as much conviction and feeling as the ones posted by Jon Fox then you would find yourself gaining far more respect than what you are getting now.Study Ken1945 and how he writes his posts.
I take his
point and it seems pretty
obvious that any team needs it's best players to perform well to be at or close to their best, but
if the form of our forwards really is so important to Arsenal then it is vital that the boss somehow gets them to play like this every week.
much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for
obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting
point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine
if this relationship flourishes or devolves..
The
obvious deciders are
if we take
points against the teams above us that we still have left to play.
It's an
obvious one, but honestly there's little
point looking at other strikers
if you can pick up Gabriel Barbosa.
People will
point to the sale of Nathan Baker as being a mistake and whilst he would clearly be the
obvious solution
if he were he still at the club, the lure of first - team football was understandably too much for him.
It's hard to tell at this
point if Firmino is still underrated by those that don't support Liverpool, because his qualities should be
obvious to just about everyone by now.
Palace preyed on the fairly
obvious weaknesses in Jurgen Klopp's side, and
if Liverpool are to gather enough
points to remain in the top four while those behind them plug away at their games in hand, they need to at least hide their weaknesses as best they can, even
if they can't solve them.
If it's come to the
point where you and your soon - to - be-ex are barely speaking, do everything you can to make the conflict less
obvious to your children.
If you had asked me what my greatest fear was at the beginning of my pregnancy — or, hell, at any
point before I had my baby safely in my arms — the answer would have been
obvious.
It's like
pointing out the
obvious:
If you have a customer asking you where the fitting room is, direct them to the fitting room.
But
if Scotland waits for independence to begin this process it is likely that many of the fundamental aspects of the new Scottish Constitution will have been settled — Scotland's currency, aspects of its economic policy, and its relationship with the EU are only the most
obvious of the questions that will have been resolved by this
point.
I think it could be more than theoretically interesting, because —
if political opinion reaches a «tipping
point» — one obvious quick / dirty «fix» is to dump a lot of dust at the L1 Lagrange Point (where the SOHO satellite is
point» — one
obvious quick / dirty «fix» is to dump a lot of dust at the L1 Lagrange
Point (where the SOHO satellite is
Point (where the SOHO satellite is now).
I'd be remiss
if I didn't
point out some of the research on the
obvious drug - free ways to avoid withering away to nothingness.
«There are some patients who really benefit from having a device that
points certain things out to them — even
if those things should be
obvious,» says Dr. Abbott.
Because I treat patients with lasers (wrinkles, acne scars, etc), one important
point I always mention is that
if you are trying to address
obvious sighs of aging or serious skin issues, topical products, no matter how pricey, will not help fully address the problem.
Let - Me -
Point - Out - The -
Obvious - Tip: Wash the paint off of your rubber stamp after each use, particularly
if you live in the hot desert.
If you are at the starting
point in the process of finding the right girl for you then the
obvious thing to do is to put yourself in a place where you can get to know lots of girls as potential Miss Rights.
If you're both reading the nutritional information on sugary cereal boxes,
point out the
obvious: «I'm trying to convince myself that Corn Pops are healthy.»
Even
if the action and thriller elements fall short of the intended mark, there's never a
point when the film fails to at least maintain interest, even when it becomes a bit
obvious where things are going to lead.