The available data are insufficient to say if the changes in O2 are caused by natural variability or are trends that are likely to persist in the future, but they do indicate that large - scale changes in ocean physics influence natural biogeochemical cycles, and thus the cycles of O2 and CO2 are likely to undergo changes
if ocean circulation changes persist in the future.
Not exact matches
And what we see is both how complex climate
changes can be and how profound an effect
changing patterns of
ocean circulation can have on global climate states,
if looked at on a geological time scale.»
«
If you
change the
circulation, you
change everything in the
ocean,» said Menezes, a WHOI postdoctoral investigator and the study's lead author.
I would agree that unforeseen
changes in
ocean circulation could throw off model predictions, there are surely other wildcards too, but uncertainty like that is not your friend
if you want to argue against avoiding climate
change.
You've got the radiative physics, the measurements of
ocean temperature and land temperature, the
changes in
ocean heat content (Hint — upwards, whereas
if if was just a matter of
circulation moving heat around you might expect something more simple) and of course observed predictions such as stratospheric cooling which you don't get when warming occurs from oceanic
circulation.
If DO events are due to
ocean circulation changes, what triggers these
ocean circulation changes?
I would agree that unforeseen
changes in
ocean circulation could throw off model predictions, there are surely other wildcards too, but uncertainty like that is not your friend
if you want to argue against avoiding climate
change.
What
if the mixing between the
oceans were drastically reduced due to
changes in
ocean circulation?
The surface of the
oceans are always warmer than the depths of the
oceans >
If you
change the mixing efficiency, by shifting atmospheric
circulations with solar precessional cycle for example, the mixing efficiency
changes and the regions where precipitation falls
changes.
Yes, afforestation of deserts (
if it could be done) would increase the local temperatures and increase freshwater flow and thus reduce the salinity of the
oceans and
change circulation patterns.
«Greenland ice takes on a new role in the climate
change story, not just indicating
change and contributing to sea level rise, but possibly playing an important role in destabilizing regional
if not global
ocean circulation that naturally exchanges heat north - south,» said Jason Box of the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, and a study co-author, in an email to Mashable.
How atmospheric and
ocean circulation responds to various
changes in forcing would need to be detailed
if someone wanted to «prove» anthropogenic forcing is involved other than a minor increase in the average surface temperature.
Independent evidence from multiple sources suggest —
if «real» — that recent warming was all cloud
changes associated with decadal
changes in
ocean and atmospheric
circulation.
Even
if our emissions were the cause of increased atmospheric CO2 my Model still works because it reduces the effect of our CO2 to an infinitesinal
circulation change compared to the much larger
circulation changes induced by the variable sun and
ocean cycles.
There are also other natural «modes of variability» which may be affected by a climate
change, for instance
if the heat transport in the
oceans are to
change (e.g. the Atlantic meridional overturning
circulation AMOC).
They conclude with another warning: ``...
if major shifts in sea ice cover and
ocean circulation tip even large ice shelf cavities from cold to warm (35), there could be major
changes in ice shelf and thus ice sheet mass balance.»
Here, we present an explanation for time - invariant land — sea warming ratio that applies
if three conditions on radiative forcing are met: first, spatial variations in the climate forcing must be sufficiently small that the lower free troposphere warms evenly over land and
ocean; second, the temperature response must not be large enough to
change the global
circulation to zeroth order; third, the temperature response must not be large enough to modify the boundary layer amplification mechanisms that contribute to making φ exceed unity.
an SR tweet: «And
if the
ocean circulation is sensitive to climate
change, as is highly likely, will the currents respond abruptly and perhaps violently at some point, or will the transition be smooth?