Sentences with phrase «if only the owners»

Adult humans do not require anesthesia during routine trips to the doctor, dentist, and hairdresser; neither would dogs, if only their owners had taught them to enjoy meeting and being handled by people.

Actually — and I'm sure you will agree — these kitchens wouldn't look so bad if only the owners would have dressed them up with a pot rack or two.

Not exact matches

I mean, if you are the only owner, what's the point... right?

Even if a would - be business owner has only a few thousand dollars saved, however, that money enables him or her to pay for basic medical expenses like doctor visits, pharmacy bills, and new eyeglasses.

As a small business owner, you can contribute not only to your company's 401 (k), SEP or SIMPLE IRA, but to a Roth IRA too, if you meet the income restrictions.

«Most business owners don't realize they could be saving thousands of dollars per month if they only used the right systems, programs and expense optimization tactics,» explains Gerber, who along with Paugh recently co-founded SimpleBusiness, an absolute must - have membership for every small business owner, startup founder and freelancer that saves time, headaches and money on everyday business - related expenses and name - brand services (more on that below).

You are speaking to business owners and, if you do a good job, you are far more likely to walk away with business because you're the only expert / speaker speaking to that group of hot leads.

If someone's phone picks up the EID (ephemeral ID) being emitted from the luggage, it automatically triggers a notification detailing the time and location of the suitcase that is sent only to the suitcase's owner.

If a company boss can't play with a government official, there's little point in him spending his money,» said the owner of a golf equipment store in Shanghai who only gave his surname as Huang.

Business owners have until October 3 to apply, and will only be considered eligible if they run U.S. - based, for - profit companies with 100 employees or fewer.

The children get voting rights only after the other owner's death and only if they are employed by the business.

Small business owners with only a handful of customers or clients at a time strategize to stay afloat if any leave

You may vote shares for which you are the beneficial owner in person at the 2018 Annual Meeting only if you obtain a «legal proxy» from the broker, bank or other intermediary that holds your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares.

The goal here is to remove one of the biggest frustrations that Tesla owners experience: having to plug in their car when they get home, or if not, walking into their garage the next morning only to find that their car is out of power.

If the company is sued, creditors can go after not only the business assets, but also the owner's personal assets.

Under federal law, fully automatic weapons are technically legal only if made before 1986, when Congress passed the Firearm Owners» Protection Act.

If you are a beneficial owner of Shares and your Shares are held in street name as described above, you will be admitted to the 2015 Annual Shareholders» Meeting only if you present either a valid legal proxy from your bank, broker, or other nominee as to your Shares, the notice of internet availability of the proxy materials (if you received one), a voting instruction form that you received from your bank, broker, or other nominee (if you have not already completed and returned the voting instruction form), or a recent bank, brokerage, or other statement showing that you owned Shares as of the close of business on April 10, 201If you are a beneficial owner of Shares and your Shares are held in street name as described above, you will be admitted to the 2015 Annual Shareholders» Meeting only if you present either a valid legal proxy from your bank, broker, or other nominee as to your Shares, the notice of internet availability of the proxy materials (if you received one), a voting instruction form that you received from your bank, broker, or other nominee (if you have not already completed and returned the voting instruction form), or a recent bank, brokerage, or other statement showing that you owned Shares as of the close of business on April 10, 201if you present either a valid legal proxy from your bank, broker, or other nominee as to your Shares, the notice of internet availability of the proxy materials (if you received one), a voting instruction form that you received from your bank, broker, or other nominee (if you have not already completed and returned the voting instruction form), or a recent bank, brokerage, or other statement showing that you owned Shares as of the close of business on April 10, 201if you received one), a voting instruction form that you received from your bank, broker, or other nominee (if you have not already completed and returned the voting instruction form), or a recent bank, brokerage, or other statement showing that you owned Shares as of the close of business on April 10, 201if you have not already completed and returned the voting instruction form), or a recent bank, brokerage, or other statement showing that you owned Shares as of the close of business on April 10, 2015.

Sam, on a related note can you do an article if the side business should be set up as an LLC, S corp or C Corp to shield earnings from taxes if you as the owner are the only «employee» of the corporation.

It was as if the casino owner had walked up to his roulette table, seen a pile of chips on 00 and announced that 00 would no longer pay 36:1 but would henceforth pay only 18:1.

Adding to this new information is some research conducted by Womenable way back in 2007, Mapping the Missing Middle: Determining the Desire and Dimensions of Second - Stage Women Business Owners, which not only raised the point that not enough policy and programmatic attention was being paid to established women - owned firms that had not yet cracked the million - dollar revenue barrier, but sized this population at between 16 % (if defined to include firms with employees or between $ 100,000 and $ 1 million in revenues) and fully 91 % (if having employees and revenues over $ 100,000 was not a criterion) of the entire women - owned business population.

Some card issuers only report activity to the cardholder's personal credit reports if the owner defaults.

If you're the only owner, your state law may not shield you as much.

With Alphabet only offering its owners a «Say on Pay» once every three years, it will be interesting to see if shareholders take this opportunity to make a stand, however symbolic it may be.

In the National Income and Product Accounts, «rent» appears on only one line, where it refers to the benefit owner - occupants receive from their own residences, as if they paid rent to themselves.

You can only assume the IRA if you're the account owner's surviving spouse and you're the IRA's only beneficiary.

Not only does sending out link trade request emails that mention the term «PageRank» more often than Larry and Sergey's original patent to the owner of a link building related blog already makes me think that you possibly haven't taken a thorough look at my website, but if you also can't even find my name on this blog...

However, if you are a single doctor making $ 300,000 per year, did not have to address a meaningful debt burden, and only have $ 100,000 in investments at the age of forty, you have done something very wrong (most likely, you either lived at your means or traded stocks instead of thinking like an owner that made long - term investments) even if you have that same $ 100,000 in paper wealth because you had the skill set and personal opportunity costs to do so much more with your hand in life.

Right, if the owner of a company is a member of a religion that doesn't believe in using medicine at all do they have the right then to provide only an insurance policy that covers prayer?

I don't know if the blog owners only post believer signs — perhaps I'll locate a non-believer one and submit it.

So the idea that only criminals have guns, if guns are banned, kinda a falls apart, since all the illegal weapons had to come from legal owners, (who didn't defend themselves?)

In any case, if there were only one manufacturer of a particular produce, such as shoes, the owner would keep the price high.

While we agree that it's fine for the owner to be generous with those who worked only an hour, we think that if he was going to be both genera and fair, then he should also be generous to those who worked all day.

Oh the joy if only we could go back to the early 1800's where a good honest white land owner could head to town any Saturday and buy a whole new pack of n e gros to take home so he could help with the building of his new Church... And don't forget ladies, you are meant to be seen, not heard, and don't you dare be so immoral as to let your ankle show... Now get back in the kitchen!!

Indeed, one law in Exodus, intended to make the lot of slaves more tolerable, goes only so far as to declare the owner liable to punishment if, in beating a slave, he kills him outright, whereas if the wounded slave «continue a day or two» the owner escapes penalty, «for he is his money.

if a man and his wife went into slavery for debt together, they should go free together the seventh year, but if the man, entering bondage alone, was given his wife by his owner, even though children were born, only the man could go free; (Exodus 21:3 - 4.)

If small busniess owners (like someone who owned five rental properties) can decide only to rent to legally married couples, for instance (and marital status is one of those things for which you are protected from descrimination) then there could suddenly be quite a number of people who are unable to find places to live, or can be taken advantage of by a limited number of other renters.

If your answer is YES, then the only problem here is the owner who has not sack Wenger because he obviously love what the man (Wenger) is doing for him... making money like we did this summer making a profit on transfers when other clubs were spending lots of money upgrading their teams.

If you mean the owners should invest more money into the club to pay the players higher salaries (salaries are payroll) than the only way to that through equity (shares or rights issues).

We may all as well Get used to falling down the table The owner doesn't care, if he doesn't give a shot about clubs in his own country he won't give a sh # t about Arsenal There's only 3 ways of attracting BIG players to your club Champions League NO offer them silly money Nope that's not happening Or a Top manage errr

If we had a rich owner who was happy to put more money in the club things would be different but Kroenke only takes money out he doesn't put any in (or so it seems).

Maybe if the board got the players he wants then it wouldn't look so headless at times, being given Welbeck to resolve our CF issue has only made it worse, Wenger needed a top CF and the owner failed him.

One of the biggest issues with the NHL is, if only 11 teams made money, how can the owners justify keeping the current system and not overhauling it again?.

I will always despise kroenke for being an absentee owner who doesn't care about the sporting side of arsenal only the financial aspect, I still wonder why Wenger didn't leave all these years if the board are so terrible like some claim, yet he is still here getting pay raises If the board has been hindering the club's success by not providing funds, why hasn't the manager lefif the board are so terrible like some claim, yet he is still here getting pay raises If the board has been hindering the club's success by not providing funds, why hasn't the manager lefIf the board has been hindering the club's success by not providing funds, why hasn't the manager left?

Good idea, if we don't fight for our rights, who would fight for us.boycott is the only solution.I wonder those buying tickets estimated 1billion bound a year, without having any respect from the club owners

its not his style.then if he buys lemar, benzema he cant win title.other team knows his tactics very well.the american owner knows only wenger will act like a doll.he can sell ox and buy mahrez.wenger is not a tacnician to win epl.and the board is not ambitious.

he knows Wenger only has a two year contract so trying to act tough by saying he will sack him if he manages tp complete his refinery and if current owners willing to sell... oh yes and in 3 years conveniently whrn Wenger likely to be gone anyway... easy to be tough talking when it has no substance!

Arsenal have a real problem, the owner is a greedy yank who only cares about his wealth, the owner does not care about winning trophies and if anything he thinks that going for them will hurt the club in the long run!

It will only get worse if the board and owner change or they some how recognise that only being successful of the pitch will not work as a business strategy.

And now Jeter, the mouthpiece for actual owner Bruce Sherman, is out here spinning this move as if Stanton could have stayed, if only he hadn't decided he had to go.

The contract situations of these plays is not down to Wenger only, they will be signed already if it's down to him alone, the club owners are refusing to pay what the players demand.