The Court noted that credibility issues «almost inevitably arise in antagonistic employer - employee relations» and that the power in the statute to proceed by written submissions would be «rendered completely meaningless and deprived of Parliament's intended effect»
if oral hearings were required whenever credibility issues arose.
Not exact matches
Abrahamic religions believe the Old Testament, New Testament and Koran are not open to edit, because we do not believe in modern prophesy — Hell,
if we did,
Oral Robers would have rewritten everything by now cuz to
hear him tell it, it basically lives in God's kitchen with Him 24/7.
The time available for these
hearings is limited so contact the People's Inquiry
if you wish to attend or submit
oral evidence to the panel.
On Feb. 26, the United States Supreme Court will
hear oral arguments in Janus v. AFSCME, a case that boils down to the question of whether public - sector unions have a right to collect dues from workers they bargain on behalf of, even
if they are not union members.
Hello my name is shelbie i am 19 will be turning 20
hear shortly i am 5» 2 with blue eyes brown hair i have a very nice athletic body, i love sex safe sex with older woman i am a very passionate person when it comes to sex i love to please
oral and etc i also like to be pleased
if you would like...
And
if you
heard the skeptical questions from the justices during
oral arguments, today's conclusion comes as no surprise.
Although it is our policy to discourage them outside of any public meeting or
hearing, we sometimes receive substantive
oral communications (sometimes referred to as «ex parte» contacts) concerning a rulemaking;
if we do, it is our policy to prepare summaries of those public contacts and place them in the docket.
If you are concerned about your pet's
oral health, you'll be pleased to
hear that we provide animal dental services as well.
If you live in the U.S., you've surely
heard an
oral history of naughty cyclists.
If judgment is reserved, you may have to come back to court on another day to
hear the judge give an
oral decision.
Case law was presented at the
oral hearing that a driver can lawfully refuse a breath demand
if he or she has not consumed any alcohol prior to the officer issued demand.
But in circumstances where the appellant accepted the invitation to participate in an
oral hearing before the first reviewer, and in the absence of any evidence to suggest that he would have responded differently
if invited to attend a further interview before the second respondent, I would infer that it is more likely than not that the appellant would have sought an
oral hearing before the second respondent
if he had been told that the first reviewer by whom he was originally interviewed had been replaced (pars.
If you are entitled to an
oral hearing it may be in your best interest to attend.
If a reviewing court decides that an
oral hearing is needed, the agency will need to alter its standard procedure in order to deal with that particular case.
This type of diabetes is a chronic condition and
if not treated properly or as soon as possible it could lead to other medical issues, including blood vessel disease, heart disease, as well as a higher risk of high blood pressure, heart attack, stroke, kidney damage, nerve damage, blindness, osteoporosis,
hearing problems,
oral conditions, and skin conditions.
Family Law Arbitration is a process where a third - party neutral expert receives the facts, the evidence, and the legal argument in advance, as much or as little as you agree to submit; has a unique understanding of the law; and then conducts an
oral hearing to let the parties and / or their counsel make
oral submissions, and cross-examine witnesses,
if they wish.
Lastly, the Court examined the
hearing before the Appeal Committee and found that, even
if there had been legitimate concerns raised about the
hearing before the Dean, the appeal to the Appeal Committee provided the applicant with a fresh
hearing at which there was
oral testimony, an opportunity for cross-examination, full documentary disclosure and the opportunity to be represented by counsel.
If granted, the United States Supreme Court could
hear oral argument as soon as October 2018.
If it is your preference to attend for the
oral hearing then that, of course, will be arranged.
The nine months» time - limit also puts pressure on the parties and their counsel to engage in efficient case management, particularly
if two rounds of written pleadings are to be exchanged, full document production exercise is to be undertaken and one or two weeks» of
oral hearing is to be conducted followed by the exchange of written post-
hearing briefs.
At the time that you submit your application the clerk at the Driver's Services Center will actually set the
hearing date for the
Oral Review or the Submission Date
if it is a Written Review.
The reason is quite simple: in an
oral hearing you can submit written materials in advance of the
oral hearing (thus, in effect giving you the benefit of written submissions
if you choose) BUT in a written review
hearing you are simply left with written submissions.
However,
if the foreign judgment does not require a
hearing for
oral arguments, such foreign judgment will be recognisable and enforceable when the defendant submits an affidavit to the foreign court in response to the plaintiff / petitioner.
(d) a witness shall attend the
hearing for
oral examination
if requested to do so not less than 2 days before the
hearing, or by telephone, videoconference or other electronic media
if directed by the arbitration tribunal;
(c) An expert whose report has been delivered under sub-rule 1 shall attend the
hearing for
oral examination,
if requested not less than 7 days before the
hearing.
26 (1) The arbitral tribunal may conduct the arbitration on the basis of documents or may hold
hearings for the presentation of evidence and for
oral argument; however, the tribunal shall hold a
hearing if a party requests it.
If none of the important facts are in dispute and there is no «accuser» to be questioned, an
oral hearing may not be necessary.
If a tribunal's decision may turn on findings of fact made from conflicting evidence or on the credibility of witnesses, there may be a right to an
oral hearing and cross-examination of those witnesses.
Practitioners should note also the provisions of PD 55 para. 5.4: (1)
if the maker of a witness statement does not attend the
hearing; and (2) the other party disputes material evidence contained in his statement, the court will normally adjourn the
hearing so that
oral evidence can be given.
If, for example, a complainant were to seek an
oral hearing on the basis
oral argument was vital to his or her opportunity to present a case, little could reasonably be expected to overcome such an assessment, since the «fair and full opportunity» test appears to be based on an applicant's subjective view.
(iv)
if the application is refused, the claimant should renew at an
oral hearing; that
hearing should be limited to an hour and the claimant will face a liability for costs
if its application is unsuccessful.
The Senate amendments have not yet been incorporated into the bill, but they would require that
if an individual has received notice that they have obtained their citizenship through fraud or misrepresentation, they will be able to request an
oral hearing from an impartial, independent adjudicator, says Mendelsohn, and «not just from the minister.
An
oral presentation will be made by the evaluator in open court at a Settlement / Status
Hearing, and a written report is then provided to the Court five days before trial
if the case does not settle.
While this might be beneficial, at least in the sense that the non-prevailing party might understand,
if not appreciate, the basis on which the award was based, there has been an on - going concern that, given the task of comprehensively and accurately articulating all of the acts and factors that are taken into account by an arbitration panel in rendering its award, there might be an understandable (and possibly unavoidable) tendency to oversimplify or generalize the basis on which an award was made, with the resulting explanation or rationale or «findings», whether written or
oral, being relied on by the non-prevailing party (and likely by others) as «precedent» to be introduced and relied on at future arbitration
hearings.
Next Thursday, the Florida Supreme Court will
hear oral arguments in a big Florida foreclosure defense case — so big, in fact, that lots of banks are complaining to the news media that there will be a huge state - wide financial crisis
if the Florida Supreme Court sides with the Average Joe citizen who's fighting this -LSB-...]