Sentences with phrase «if parties»

«This solution is both reasonable, and, if the parties act in good faith, it would resolve the ongoing distrust and ensure a lasting peace and long term working relationship,» the Democrats wrote.

It would be much better if the parties could get together and figure out something that is reasonable.»

It is valid if both parties understand the terms of the agreement and willfully accept them.

... a state indicates its consent to be bound to a treaty if the parties intended to show their consent by such an act....

As with the Tories Labour would also call on the DUP and Liberal Democrats first if those parties were sufficient to yield a majority, on the basis that the SNP will be harder for Labour to do a deal with, especially given their differences over Trident.

All that is really needed is a swearing in ceremony after a quick meeting of the Cabinet secretaries and (possibly) a letter is sent from the Vice President to both President pro tem of the Senate and the Speaker of the House given these facts, if the parties wish to strictly adhere to the 25th Amendment.

«If it comes into the next election... if all parties agree on privatisation then what's the choice really»

«This solution is both reasonable, and, if the parties act in good faith, it would resolve the ongoing distrust and ensure a lasting peace and long term working relationship.»

It will be difficult to construct election manifestos or advocate policies if parties can not be sure of delivery, either because of the performance of smaller parties in Scotland, or because, depending on the make - up of English MPs, such policies may be vetoed in the south.

If the parties fail to reach an agreement, and the U.S. economy starts to shrink after three years of growth, the consequences will soon be exported across the Atlantic.

If all parties involved did not improve their willingness to make progress, he added, «the two - state solution is going to get steadily more difficult and within a few years may become impossible - and that would leave us with decades of potential conflict».

«If the parties can not now reach agreement, there will be terrible long term consequences for the reputation and state of British politics.

What I have heard today from our four distinguished briefers convinces me that there can be peace and stability in Sudan, if the parties commit to peace.

These are supervised meetings facilitated by our Marriage and Family Therapist and only coordinated if both parties wish to meet.

It usually is possible if both parties agree when using an adoption agency.

If the parties have great communication with each other, a child custody agreement may not be necessary.

If someone gets hurt it has to stop, even if both parties want it to continue.

A court in Utah will always consider joint physical or legal custody if both parties have completed a parenting plan and if joint custody serves the best interests of the child.

Cheating in and of itself is a narcissistic and destructive urge that our narcissistic society sadly nurtures and feeds, and yes, it would be far better to openly deal with issues of monogamy / nonmonogamy — and engage in open relationships if BOTH parties mutually agree — but this narcissistic and unjust DOUBLE - STANDARD has to go where supposedly «nonemotional» men get a pass on what actually constitutes cheating, not open relationships, but «emotional» women do not.

Sometimes that happens, and if both parties are savvy to what's going on and agree to it, why should anyone else care?

For instance, what if the parties» intimacy expectations deviate from the marital plan?

Marital planning provides an opportunity to discuss these issues beforehand, see if both parties are on the same page and, more importantly, set expectations and plan how to address expectations that are not met.

Krista — In a perfect world, I agree that it'd be great if both parties could reach out to the other side.

If the parties are miles apart in wages, if they are sensing the reluctance to commit, or player dissatisfaction with the team, they must explore options.

In football, unlike practically every other industry on earth, football agents can act for both sides in a transfer, and even three if all parties are in agreement.

Talks have now closed and announcement could come in the next week if both parties feel it's the right moment.

Soldado has failed to adapt to life in English football since he joined the club from La Liga giants Valencia 18 months ago, despite his impressively prolific goalscoring record in Spanish football, and it would be little surprise if all parties decide that it is beneficial for his spell at Spurs to come to an end.

No team going through a rapid - fire 15 - minute session, subsequent pro day dinner, on - campus workout or top - 30 visit will succeed if all parties aren't driving at the same few points.

Some other countries are open already hence deals are being announced, also out of contract players can move freely and also if all parties (both clubs, the relevant fa's, the player, all the sponsors and all the agents) are in agreement then a deal for an in contract player can be confirmed, to get all that permission ahead of the window opening is really difficult.

If he opts to stay he will be offered an improved contract, but it won't match Chelsea's offer, and so if both parties agree to the move, then Sandro could find himself becoming a $ 70m player by the end of this summer.

Arguably Wenger isn't using him at all so maybe it would be better to let him leave to free up squad space, but realistically he is such a high quality reserve if both parties are happy with that situation then selling him for # 5m is kind of pointless!

I'd argue that, if both parties are aware of the risk involved and choose to participate willingly, it is a calculated business decision and not innately shady.

That won't be helped by the fact that Liverpool are unlikely to be in the Champions League next season but with Suarez alongside him the trophy - winnig days might not be too far away if all parties can be patient.

Kids need more fun in their birthday parties and if these parties are healthy and funny then these will be wonderful party ideas for kids.

He warned again on Friday that if the parties do not come up with an effective solution, the government will step in.

If the parties overcome the government's attempt to enjoin the merger, it has the potential to alter the competitive dynamics in foodservice distribution.

If the parties wish to seek reauthorisation in 2023, the ACCC will test whether the expected benefits and detriments have arisen and to assess the effectiveness of the condition,» Mr Sims said.

In some circumstances, the parties may want to seek a formal waiver or ruling from the relevant regulators to confirm that a filing is not necessary, and it might only be possible to do this in a timely manner if the parties start the analysis early in the process.

The fact is, in my experience, that accountability only has teeth if both parties are mutual and agree.

If the Church refused to marry them because they did not meet its criteria for a sacramental wedding» if both parties were of the same sex, for example» the state could do nothing about it, since the Church is a voluntary association protected by the free exercise clause of the First Amendment.

It's only interesting if both parties set aside their differences and biases and openly attempt to understand the other as opposed to name - calling and closed - mindedness.

You said, «It's only interesting if both parties set aside their differences and biases and openly attempt to understand the other as opposed to name - calling and closed - mindedness.»

In Deuteronomy 24:1, moreover, Moses teaches that marriages broken in infidelity can not be restored, even if both parties want to get back together.

Nevertheless, precisely because moral acts are relative in this way, in all sexual relations certain promises are necessary if the parties involved are not to harm one another, affront one another's dignity, or illegitimately rob one another of their liberty.

How different would be the certainly inevitable controversies in the Church if all parties would fight honestly, admitting the weaknesses and dangers of their own position, if they would only acknowledge at least the speck in their own eye while they think themselves obliged to take exception to the log in the eye of their neighbour.

Whether you agree or disagree with the evangelicals» conclusions or the validility of their premises (I am sure that there are people who either completely agree or vehemently disagree with your underlying premise), it would be better if all parties would recognize that rationality and morality are not wholly owned by one side or the other.

Even if all parties were to agree that American republicanism is not classically liberal, or that classical liberalism really is ontologically indifferent, or that the laws of nature and of nature's God are the foundation of constitutional order and that these are the same thing as natural law — even if, in other words, all parties were to agree to some version of a pristine American founding harmonious in principle with the truth of God and the human being — returning to the first principles of the eighteenth century isn't much more realistic than a return to the first principles of the thirteenth.

That too will work if both parties agree on the system, trust each other, have a common sense of direction and know each other well.

i; m not sure i follow your little brother thing, but sharing ideas and a conversation with two differing view points is a debate, and if both parties don't try to kill the other one this is a world of understanding thru conflict, for a differing point of view is in confliction with the others.

I suggest that the same freedom of speech be afforded to both the «religious» and the «religious free» that there can be healing and healthy dialogue in community if all parties are committed to that.