Sentences with phrase «if principle of equality»

Not exact matches

If we remove the Book of Galatians from our consideration, then the principles of equality become very faint echoes in the Bible.

It was an exercise in delusion, if not hypocrisy, because all that we said about equality, life, liberty, public happiness, freedom, the right of assembly, participation, and the other noble principles applied in fact only to the white man, not to the majority of persons in this country, who at that time were red, or to a sizable minority who were black and in chains.

And if the Indian Constitution begins with affirming the humanist principles of liberty, equality, fraternity and justice it has behind it the impact of liberal and socialist secular ideologies as well as Renascent Hinduism from Raja Rammohan Roy to Gandhi who absorbed these values and made them part of the Renascent Hinduism itself.

LGBT activists seek to advance the idea that any limits on rights of «parenting» would be a violation of the principle of equality and thus an injustice, setting aside the fact that a child is always born of the union of a man and a woman — even if this union may sometimes be medically assisted.

LGBT activists seek to advance the idea that any limits on the rights of «parenting» would be a violation of the principle of equality and thus an injustice, thereby setting aside the fact that a child is always born of the union of a man and a woman — even if this union may sometimes be medically assisted.

This can be seen as an offence to equality (as you argue) but it can also be seen as the pro-localism principle of treating difference differently - ie, not imposing a one - size fits all solution if there are different demands and preferences in different nations / regions / areas.

After all, we would argue that being able to read at an advanced level, or having access to a lawyer are far greater advantages than access to a computer and, if such is the case, then the status quo is much more problematic with regard to the equality of arms principle that is a building block towards access to justice than any well conceived online platform could ever be.

Like you, I believe that there are strategies the LSUC could pursue which would achieve their substantive goals, strategies which accurately reflect existing (and unambiguous) legal and ethical obligations and which are consistent with constitutional requirements and principles (as I've noted above, if the current requirement around a Statement of Principle merely required acknowledgement of our actual existing obligations under the Rules, rather than a general duty to promote equality, diversity and inclusion which is found nowhere in the Rules, I suspect much opposition would melt away and the LSUC would be on far stronger Charter grounds).

Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court was granted on 26 February 2016, and it will be interesting to see if UNISON are able to successfully argue that the fees have breached the principles of equality and effectiveness, particularly in light of research which suggests that the employment tribunal fees, whilst a significant reason, may not be the most common reason for the withdrawal of ET or EC claim.

If jurors only had the official responsibility set out by the trial judge in Stanley, their ethical duties would be straightforward, and very similar to those of a judge — to be impartial, diligent, principled, respectful of equality, and fair in their assessment of the evidence in light of the law set out by the trial judge.

To this end, the Bill defines the concept of accommodation, asserts that the government will make any compromise to respect the right to equality between women and men and the principle of religious neutrality of the state, and provides that an accommodation can not be granted if it imposes an undue hardship on the government department or agency.

I've objected to the statement of principle on the basis that there is no legal authority for the existence of an obligation to promote equality, diversity and inclusion generally (and, despite repeated requests, have not received any particularly compelling authority to the contrary from the LSUC) and that if the LSUC wants to impose such an obligation they should amend the Rules to do so.

However, if the guiding principle of justice: equality is absolute; than doesn't candour fit squarely into distributive justice as a matter of comparative treatments of individuals?

The news is there's something in it for all of us if our colleagues provide a simple statement of principles acknowledging their commitment to promote and encourage equality, diversity and inclusion.

This Bill defines the concept of reasonable accommodation; asserts that the government will make any compromise necessary to respect equality between women and men and the principle of religious neutrality of the state; and provides that an accommodation can not be granted if it would impose an undue hardship on a government department or agency, including education, even to the extent of prohibiting the hijab (veil).

If by likening native title to a proprietary interest the common law provides the same level of protection and security to the unique relationship that Indigenous people have with their land and sea country as that which is provided to all non-Indigenous proprietary interests, then such a translation is consistent with the principle of substantive equality.