Sentences with phrase «if public questions»

When asked he verified there is NO reason to believe or infer that any change is on the foreseeable horizon — yet he insisted that the funds will go away, the project would end, and the public would suffer solely if public questions continued.

Not exact matches

If you're concerned that they'll say something that damages your business, ask yourself two questions: 1) Why is there something so horrible that making it public will damage the business?

Facebook has never really grappled with those questions in any kind of public way, perhaps because it is afraid of the implications if it embraces its nature as a media outlet.

«If there are some very big volatile issues and the public gets hurt in any sense, I think that could cause a chill to this market without question,»» Dudas said.

Go back to question # 2 — if the issue affects stakeholders outside of your company, consider making it public before someone else does.

It all started with this simple question: if a company is wholly good and engaged in sincere, ongoing and proactive dialogue with its stakeholders, then to what extent would they require the counsel and services of a public relations firm?

If you're unsure about how to make the best of your dealings with your outside accountant, start reading 101 Questions to Ask Your CPA, a free eight - page brochure provided by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).

But Dr. Sandro Galea, dean of Boston University's school of public health, offers a heretical question: What if we were to design a healthcare system that actually gave us what we want?

Mr. Zuckerberg declined to answer whether Facebook is a neutral public forum or if it is expressing its own views of free speech, avoiding a complex legal question that Mr. Cruz was posing.

This week in the legislature, the NDP's backbencher queries in question period were often devoted to asking NDP ministers what carnage would occur to schools, nurses and poor old granny if Jason Kenney slashed and burned the public sector.

-- Mueller's team is asking witnesses «pointed questions» about whether Trump had prior knowledge of the stolen Democratic emails before they were made public, and if he was involved in their release.

In his first public response to questions about the payment, the president said he did not know where his attorney, Michael Cohen, got the money, and he declined to say if he ever set up a fund for Mr Cohen to cover such expenses.

Mr. Speaker, if the Prime Minister were to participate in an open public forum with open questions, I think that he would have a hard time convincing Canadians that he shares their priorities.

In the question session, philosophy professor Jeff Jordan made the following observation to Dennett, «If Darwinism is inherently atheistic, as you say, then obviously it can't be taught in public schools.»

My question was, why is anyone fighting to have a prayer in a meeting if it's really no big deal and is not intended to inject religion into government / public affairs?

If six out of every hundred persons who went swimming at a certain beach contracted a disease that had all sorts of destructive effects, it would certainly be regarded as a question of public morals and safety.»

In the end it will harm confidence and willing obedience more than the public discussion even of delicate questions, because they are well known in any case and can be discussed more objectively in public than if they are only debated in small fanatical circles.

Most segregated schools were public, so I have to question your reading comprehension if you think I'm advocating public school segregation.

Even if it is misconceived, though, the question is still pressed upon us: Is it permissible in our political community for public decisions to be based on moral values informed by religion?

If folks like you believe that u have the right to pray wherever the heck you want to in public and ask for schools to observe holidays at your convenience, then the rest of us have the right to question this nonsense.

Moreover, if God needed to intervene to influence three people to notice Peter and ask this question, that would obviously not be difficult for him to do — though, since Peter had been a very public figure, we have no reason to assume God needed to intervene even this much.

The public overwhelmingly opposes increasing immigration (the number would no doubt be even more overwhelming if the question were restricted to low - skill immigration).

If we now find ourselves obliged to raise precisely this question once again and to think it over afresh, we must first of all make it clear that we are here taking the concept of good in its widest sense, that is to say, simply as the contrary of vicious, lawless and scandalous, as the opposite of public transgression of the moral law, as good in contrast to the publican and harlot.

If we assume that the Pope knew what was happening, then the question is whether his public silence was an act of moral cowardice or an act of moral prudence.

Also I have a question to the public, if this becomes the «legal» then should we also allow people to have more than one wife or husband since it makes them happy and they are not bothering society?

In that case Justice Rehnquist wrote that Alabama has the right to enforce government - sponsored prayer in public schools, and even to establish a state - sponsored church if it wants to — which questions the premise (based on the Fourteenth Amendment) that constitutional prohibitions on infringement of rights extend to the states.

In the face of a threat to public order, those with public power and the responsibility for maintaining peace, even if they care about justice, as Pilate did, are sometimes under pressure to sacrifice justice — and with it, all pretense of determining whose views are correct when it comes to life's big questions.

The public policy question becomes, «If trappers bear responsibility for catching free - roaming pets (all of which aren't even injured), what responsibility do owners have for the negative effects of their pets» actions?»

If people believe this nonsense, then why are they afraid to answer the question in public?

And my question to God at the time was: «If this diagnosis and proposed treatment is a gift from you, how is it possible that the solution to my very private and secret struggle is to make very outward and public changes?»

Well Willard that brings me to another question if Romney also served as a bishop while being governor, how did he infuse his church doctrine into public office?

But, question, what if others were always down on you, always telling you were wrong, you were going to hell, etc. for loving your girlfriend or your wife or shunned you for holding the other's hand in public.

I wonder if a short note of encouragement or comment — not for public consumption — would be permissible in the «Ask a Bible or Theology Question» section.

However, if this is correct, surely such a plan would have been put into place before the start of the new season, and questions will justly be asked of this decision by Mourinho, which comes just days after his public criticism.

That raises an obvious question — if sportsbooks are really being hammered by public money on the Patriots, why haven't they adjusted the spread?

When public office holders are asked questions about failings of their departments, they never say that their system is great (even if they are) and what happened is just an anomaly.

I wonder if one of the big questions all Gooners want to ask is why he finds the need to wear that ridiculous «syrup» in public?

These are essentially questions of public policy, and if real solutions are going to be found to the problems of disadvantaged children, these questions will need to be addressed, in a creative and committed way, by public officials at all levels — by school superintendents, school - board members, mayors, governors, and cabinet secretaries — as well as by individual citizens, community groups, and philanthropists across the country.

True — the word «sex» is not mentioned (unsuprisingly, being in public), but if anyone has any doubt about this, then ask yourself this question: if someone of the opposite sex was to walk up to you in the street and say to you «I want to take you, I want to hold you and I want to have you!»

So, if busybodies pop up with ridiculous questions like, «Well, if women can just nurse in public, what's next?

If you have concerns or questions, talk to your paediatrician, family doctor or a public health nurse, and look for local community resources that support parents.

We also provide anonymous post service so if a member doesn't want to post a question in public, we can help them post.

The only issue with too deep questions is that, if there is no member in the public with enough knowledge of the issues, it might go unanswered.

Sure, if the people in question had turned out to be millionaires whose receipt of public funds made a mockery of the entire nanny - state concept, that'd be one thing.

A question I often pose when taking part in public debates is «if not us who?»

If not through conditionality of membership prospects, the EU should be involved at least in a number of politically - related and politically - neutral questions, from education reform to public control for tender procedures and anti-corruption measures with detailed benchmarks.

On the contrary, if we neglect to ask those questions, we will let down not just the public but tens of thousands of police officers and staff up and down the country.

Question is, what would the numbers be if you normalize for prosecutor bending to public pressure and sending LE - defenant cases to the jury (to avoid public backlash, or pressure from the Feds) that clearly have no way of being successfully prosecuted and would NOT be brought to the jury by the same prosecutor for a civilian without publicity involved?

If, say, questions about austerity or the regulation of banks are in the public eye, different ideologies will try to win the debate by appealing to the virtues of private enterprise, or to the need for public transparency and accountability, or to the greater redistribution of wealth.

«If the question of impeachment dominates the news this fall, like so many other voter concerns, it breaks along partisan lines,» says Dr. Lee M. Miringoff, Director of The Marist College Institute for Public Opinion.