Sentences with phrase «if questions seem»

If those questions seem ridiculous, how about the absolute ridiculousness of putting a star's weight on the cover of a magazine?

What if questions seem to always lead to anxious, worried, negative, worst - case scenario outcomes.

Sorry if these questions seem harsh but no one can tell you what you should or should not do.

Excuse me if my questions seem a bit silly, everything I know about Meteorology and Climatology have been from learning and reading online (at the most credible places I can find, this being on of them)

Sorry if my questions seem burdensome, but for more clarity, do you think that adding technology would enable better performance in the schools, thereby leading to the obsolescence of the Title I moniker?

Math and science, he said, are taught in the spirit of the humanities even if their questions seem not to be as existentially pressing.

I am very new to investing, still trying to research and learn so forgive me if my question seems ignorant, I appreciate any information you have (love your site by the way and have spent half the week reading articles and comments).

If that question seems easy to answer today, how do we perceive sacramental grace penetrating the walls of sincerely held doctrine and belief?

I apologize if this question seems rude.

I am newbie, so forgive me if my question seems trivial.

I'm sorry if this question seems a duplicate of another (likely this), but my situation is actually a little different.

Not exact matches

Even though most interviews include at least a few of the most common interview questions, and even if the candidate is asked to answer one or two unusual interview questions (like these), the answers can seem a little too rehearsed and a lot insincere.

You're not going to get the answers you need if it seems like you might be looking into downsizing or restructuring, so be explicit about why you're asking these questions and how honest answers will help your employees get the solutions they need.

If the other person seems hesitant to open up, encourage them to do so by asking substantial questions.

If you've done the math and a Roth seems to make sense, the next question is how to fund it.

The truth is, if someone looks depressed and lethargic, they sleep in late and don't laugh at any jokes, and seem to be just pushing themselves to do anything at work, it's not a bad idea to ask a question.

He has time to ponder such questions these days, if only because SRC seems healthier than ever.

«There was almost a cultural ennui where everyone was so used to the status quo that the notion of questioning it seemed almost, if I may say, unnecessary,» she said.

These differences may seem a little «duh» for some, but laying out the obvious is a good start as you consider the more complicated question of which one is right for you — whether you're just beginning to make the decision or if you're rethinking your current strategy.

Final question (if that doesn't dig into your consultancy services)-- It seems most people simply «price surf» is lower competitive prices more important than marketing for conversions?

It's easy to put it in the back of your mind when it seems like all stocks do is rise but it's a question of when, not if, the next bear market will hit.

If you're talking with someone on the phone asking more questions is a good idea, but sometimes surveys online can seem daunting if they last more than 5 minuteIf you're talking with someone on the phone asking more questions is a good idea, but sometimes surveys online can seem daunting if they last more than 5 minuteif they last more than 5 minutes.

YC typically provides $ 5K plus $ 5K per founder of seed funding for usually 6 % of the equity in common stock (which, as an aside, Sarah Lacy seems to question, but in my mind seems like something that I would jump at if I were a fledgling entrepreneur).

Not too shabby, but if we were GS shareholders we'd certainly have a few questions about the deal — especially as it seems in hindsight that it was completely unnecessary.

It seems as if in every meeting I have had lately with clients, questions about the upcoming U.S. election and its implications for markets are the first to come up.

A bad apple will probably be swayed by a breeze and hit the ground faster, but the kind of «bad apple» in question who is practising as REALTOR in B.C., didn't seem to be concerned if they would even hit the ground — let alone how hard they might hit, and that's the problem Marty that seems to be above your level of reasoning.

You seem to believe that you are aware of what everyone is thinking, as this is the second time you have made a sweeping blanket statement... but to answer your question: I can assure you if that woman did see an angel telling her to kill her children, it certainly would have been a fallen angel, or demon if you prefer and not from God... If you had even a basic understanding of angels and fallen angels and the protection of God, this would be a moot point... but it appears that you want to play the game of how ridiculous can I be.if that woman did see an angel telling her to kill her children, it certainly would have been a fallen angel, or demon if you prefer and not from God... If you had even a basic understanding of angels and fallen angels and the protection of God, this would be a moot point... but it appears that you want to play the game of how ridiculous can I be.if you prefer and not from God... If you had even a basic understanding of angels and fallen angels and the protection of God, this would be a moot point... but it appears that you want to play the game of how ridiculous can I be.If you had even a basic understanding of angels and fallen angels and the protection of God, this would be a moot point... but it appears that you want to play the game of how ridiculous can I be...

Even in classical theism, the question of whether God is «above the law» is deeply complex and quite possibly aporetic, since if God has a nature, it seems to follow that God is dependent on that nature.

anyway, if you heard an atheist ask you a question about any type of belief and really try to make your answer seem wrong then they are wrong, they can not nor will not ever be able to discuss any type of belief due to what they know.

The point of the above question is if God heals why is it that He only seems to heal ambiguous diseases that have been known to heal themselves?

My question is this... If you are going to go in and share in what may seem lovely sentimentalities and veer away from the DIVINE eternal truth of God, why go in as a chaplain - a minister - just go in as a social worker or a volunteer.

Catholics will have to make up their own minds — but I'll admit I have questions about the faith of Pope Francis, which seems, if not weak, at least different from that of the Catholic tradition.

That seems a strange faith to hold, if when questioned, you refuse to provide justification and then instantly declare your faith stronger.

I will not argue whether or not the bible is the word of a god translated by man, my only question is, why would you follow a book that supports and idolizes a single deity who seems to have intentions of converting the world to his worship alone (for if there are no other gods, why then would Yahweh require that you «hold no other gods above him» — he just confirmed their existance) when said deity's followers have proven that their purpose in life is to grind any opposition to their «holy law» into dust?

Moreover, in keeping with the Church's teachings on subsidiarity, free will and real love, it seems most if not all the issues raised in the letter questioning Speaker Boehner's faith would be more efficient, effective, just and respectful of human dignity if they were left to the individual, family, community or state level.

If any question I made seems to judge your motive, I apologize.

The questions may seem leading, but you haven't come out and said what you would do if you absolutely believed that God wants you to do something that, in your previous thinking (not God's) seemed evil.

2) the question of «defining God» — if it is an entirely anthropocentric project (as you seem to assume)-- defeats the whole discussion for a transcendent being.

I didn't say people's faith should be based on this, but since you brought it up, if a religion teaches it's followers God answers prayer and someone never has a prayer answered any rational person would question why his religion is teaching him something that doesn't seem to be true.

It seems very Anglo - Saxon kind of question to ask if Jesus had a sense of humor - kind of ridiculous like arguing about how many angels can stand on the pin of a needle.

It is a question if the last two really belong to the controversy series: they are more like attacks upon the scribes than controversies with them, and the question of the Davidic sonship seems more like a debate within the church than a controversy with the scribes, though its form reminds us of number 8:

Others like C. G. Jung in his Terry Lectures leave the way open to the religious interpretation «if we are so inclined,» but seem to regard the question as irrelevant to the healing process.

Pharaoh seems to have forgotten that he, as an Egyptian deity, was planning to kill children, and therefore, his question proves that he is not a god or, if he is, he is not worthy of worship.

The very appetite proceeding from labor and peace of mind is gone: we eat just enough to keep us alive: our sleep is disturbed by the most frightful dreams; sometimes I start awake, as if the great hour of danger was come; at other times the howling of our dogs seems to announce the arrival of the enemy: we leap out of bed and run to arms; my poor wife with panting bosom and silent tears takes leave of me, as if we were to see each other no more; she snatches the youngest children from their beds, who, suddenly awakened, increase with their innocent questions the horror of the dreadful moment.

The parable of the sower was his answer to questions that must have seemed like the voice of Satan saying, «If you are the Son of God.»

If the nature of horseness is a static constant, as it seems to befor St Thomas and Aristotle, the question arises: can this philosophy really give an adequate account of the continuum of development in life forms that lies at the heart of the theory of evolution?

Woody Allen, it would seem, also puts into joke form an often unarticulated question: if God really exists, why doesn't he demonstrate his existence?

The word «nihilism» has a complex history in modern philosophy, but I use it in a sense largely determined by Nietzsche and Heidegger, both of whom not only diagnosed modernity as nihilism, but saw Christianity as complicit in its genesis; both it seems to me were penetratingly correct in some respects, if disastrously wrong in most, and both raised questions that we Christians ignore at our peril.

But if this seems unsuitable in the case of the Church (though it might be given some thought), the election of lay representatives beyond the small groups of the parish is a difficult question, especially as the Catholic associations no longer have a function similar to that of the political parties in appointing such represent - ative bodies.

Of course, Russ, if the question of the Bible being complete fiction is secondary to noting that the OT God to you seems like the NT God, then I guess I understand your position.