So let me try and get this straight,
if religious doctrine does not define some practice as against the law or evil but yet the laity performs these unlawful acts, it keeps the church free from culpability?
I do care
if religious doctrine becomes an excuse to exclude my fellow citizens from the rights and protections our country promises.
Not exact matches
The question is would you be able to remain in your denomination
if you based your
religious doctrines on the Bible alone?
If you are a non-US writer who has come up with a new religious doctrine and have insufficient funds to promote your writings, the only chance you have is if someone in the US happens to read about you, is interested in what you wrote and has the potential to mention your writing and / or your name in the US mainstream medi
If you are a non-US writer who has come up with a new
religious doctrine and have insufficient funds to promote your writings, the only chance you have is
if someone in the US happens to read about you, is interested in what you wrote and has the potential to mention your writing and / or your name in the US mainstream medi
if someone in the US happens to read about you, is interested in what you wrote and has the potential to mention your writing and / or your name in the US mainstream media.
So here is my question, more for the
religious than anyone else:
If you know you will go to heaven because the
doctrine your foliow says you will (i.e. christians declaring jesus is their lord and savior, or muslims believing in Allah and Muhammed) then why is there any sadness at a wake or a funeral at all?
An immigration judge can not quiz asylum seekers on
religious doctrine to see
if they are credible about their faith, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reiterated in a January ruling.
If we do not wish to speculate about this other world of which we can have no experience here, it is still important to recognize the
religious dimension of the problem to which the
doctrine of immortality is an attempted answer.
Examine your
religious doctrine thoroughly
if you dare, and
if you know how to do so honestly.
Surely we may ask him whether his view of the Church, too, must not include
doctrines that ought not even to be tolerated in the Church
if she is to have one confession and not to degenerate into a mere external
religious organization.
One of the creative process philosophers, Charles Hartshorne, states in the beginning of Man's Vision of God his conviction that «a magnificent intellectual content — far surpassing that of such systems as Thomism, Spinozism, German idealism, positivism (old or new) is implicit in the
religious faith most briefly expressed in the three words, God is love».1
If this be true what is needed is not the discarding of metaphysics but the exploration of this new possibility in the
doctrine of God's being.
But on the other hand
if the person hearing the Gospel is
religious, hmm then maybe some
doctrine is mentioned but the
doctrine is to me never associated with a church or denomination, it is the
doctrine of Gods Words as it relates to today in say like our dispensation which I never mention that word either.
Correct me
if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that the
doctrines under which the Vatican is laying into gays, women's health, social justice, and now the Women
Religious is quite novel.
The large majority of Christians have been ready to welcome the new knowledge in such things as medical science, agriculture etc., even
if they have preferred to retain the orthodox
religious doctrines.
If you want your children go to a school complying to the
religious doctrines, then choose a
religious school in the first place.
The attitude of the
religious left toward South Africa's «right - wing
religious groups» — meaning the overwhelming majority of evangelicals — would matter little
if the stakes involved nothing more than disputations over arcane issues of theological
doctrine.
I'm an atheist because I decided that I didn't agree with
religious doctrines, and that by extension those
doctrines couldn't have divine authority, and a divine being with authority would surely correct religion
if it existed.
That characteristic of your god is simply a reflection of the fear that the bronze age goat herders had 2000 years ago: they understood that
if people were encouraged to use their brains, they would quickly identify the many, many problems with
religious doctrine.
People are doing this to not stand out, its a way of making one feel imporetant, as with most
if not all so called
religious leaderrs they know very little or anything at all about the
doctrines of the religion their in and this is a Fact.
If, then, he will consider the lives of the great
religious leaders and discover how they reached their goal, he will, without doubt, pursue Islamic
doctrines, and he will heartily follow the Prophet of Islam and his true descendants.
Gays can not be sinners
if they do not follow your particular
religious doctrine.
So
if there is something unsurpassable about him for believers, it is ultimately derived from the mystery that he sacramentally mediates - Whenever a religion speaks of the «unsurpassability» of its central revelatory event, personality, or
doctrine,
religious wisdom exhorts us to acknowledge that only the unfathomable mystery to which these realities point is indeed unsurpassable.
But
if he does not believe in a
religious doctrine (a terrible sin, I know) at least Hawking does not tell anyone that they will burn in hell for not thinking the same way he does.
If, as a body, they assume the intrinsic goodness of
religious freedom and the intrinsic evil of slavery, perhaps that is because the development of Christian
doctrine has rightly tended in that direction — and thus steered between dangers that are theological as well as political.
I have a feeling that, even
if he's dispensed with traditional
religious doctrines, Bell's spiritual leanings will never allow him to see the world in purely material terms.
«25 A
doctrine of
religious liberty and therefore of pluralism was clearly implied here, even
if its widespread institutionalization was a long time in coming.
The idea of a universal evolution lends itself to a
doctrine of general meliorism and progress which fits the
religious needs of the healthy - minded so well that it seems almost as
if it might have been created for their use.
But
if both proudly refer to themselves as the Lord's chosen, they diverge on one especially inflammatory point of
religious doctrine: unlike their present - day Mormon compatriots, Mormon Fundamentalists passionately believe that Saints have a divine obligation to take multiple wives.
* S: (n) analogy (an inference that
if things agree in some respects they probably agree in others) * S: (n) analogy (drawing a comparison in order to show a similarity in some respect) «the operation of a computer presents and interesting analogy to the working of the brain»; «the models show by analogy how matter is built up» * S: (n)
doctrine of analogy, analogy (the
religious belief that between creature and creator no similarity can be found so great but that the dissimilarity is always greater; language can point in the right direction but any analogy between God and humans will always be inadequate)»
At those times, the church believed there should be limits (reasonable or not) on individuals» rights to express themselves
if that expression was contrary to the
doctrine of the Catholic Church and
religious beliefs.