Sentences with phrase «if said objects»

It's easier to create powerful social objects that act like «bubbles» to increase brand buoyancy if said objects have their roots in a brand's purpose or as Simon Sinek calls it — the brand's «Why?»

If you say this object moves, what you really mean is that this object is here when the hand of your clock is here, and so on.

Not exact matches

I think you'll end up saying, «If there are no objects in front of you, keep driving.»

Goman says that «you can tell if you have infringed on people's space by the way they react - stepping away, withdrawing their head or neck, angling their shoulders away, or placing an object (laptop purse, coffee cup) between the two of you.

And if you can accurately measure the distance between two objects, it's not hard to imagine apps that can tell you, say, whether Ikea furniture will fit through your door.

If one were to count small objects like fasteners as unique parts, Pincus said each MakerBot typically comprises several hundred parts.

«I realized,» he says in an interview, «that if you generalized what a public intellectual does to [creating] media objects» — i.e., not just books and essays — «then one could possibly create software companies that had public intellectual impact.»

Asked by Trump if they would object to that, none of the tech CEOs said they would.

«If we're successful on pepperoncini this time and somebody opens up a pepperoncini plant, they could object the next time around,» Bauer said.

The Catholic Church (and whoever else is objecting to this on religious grounds) is simply saying that «We shouldn't have to follow a law if we don't believe in it.»

I love it when I am teaching about grace, and someone in the class objects by saying, «But if what you are saying is true, then why can't I just go sin all I want?»

Now some people might object to such a rightly understood individual morality, saying that it allows Christians to act in an arbitrary manner with the result that they will drift into a moral laxism, always taking the easier line even if it does not all correspond to the spirit of the gospel.

In regard to Whitehead's introduction of God and eternal objects to explain human freedom he says: «If explanatory principles are available which could account for the sensation of freedom without at the same time taking us beyond the bounds of the actual world, we should explore them, and, if they prove to be consistent with the facts, adopt them in preference» (ISP 246If explanatory principles are available which could account for the sensation of freedom without at the same time taking us beyond the bounds of the actual world, we should explore them, and, if they prove to be consistent with the facts, adopt them in preference» (ISP 246if they prove to be consistent with the facts, adopt them in preference» (ISP 246).

Clergy will still be permitted to object to a full Christian burial if a person died in this way, a senior bishop said.

Laugh if you want, but I know from personal experience, that this object is definitely spiritually manipulated, and believe me when I say that you WILL get more than you bargained for afterwards.

If that object is the historical Jesus, then one should consider very carefully what he said... who he claimed to be and how he called his followers to live.

But if he had to choose between philosophical realism — the belief that the objects of our thinking correspond to real entities — and antirealism, then «I'm clearly a realist,» Hauerwas says.

Let us say that God would not be exactly what He is if the objects of His awareness were different.

If he had said that many Protestants view their churches as human constructs, or even that many Protestants have never given a moment's thought to whether their churches are «human constructs,» I would not object.

Therefore, if people of a particular faith wish that their loved ones also of that faith be remembered with a short statement of that faith — then I would say that anyone who objects to that is being bloody [email protected] arrogant and elitist and exclusionary.

For precisely all that has been said can also be objected to the doctrine of the immediate creation of every human soul in the course of history, if this creation makes of God's action in a special manner a member of the chain of created causes, even if only in regard to a particular finite being, which in contrast to others and by its special individual and temporal features has no intra - mundane ground and basis.

The laws of physics says that if an spinng object explodes the particles that come off spin at in the same direction on the same plane.

What if some nut objected to a child wearing a cross on his or neck, ripped it off and said it offended him?

Indeed, it might be said that we shall be less excellent Americans or Britons or Frenchmen, less admirable members of the human race as a whole, if we are content with an object of devotion less than Almighty God himself.

Because, if it were «affected», then it would be more like «having an affect on» on or «contributing to», whereas «effected» you would be saying the subject (man) caused or implemented or brought about the object (global climate).

As a first approximation, we may say that the poetic function points to the obliterating of the ordinary referential function, at least if we identify it with the capacity to describe familiar objects of perception or the objects which science alone determines by means of its standards of measurement.

If we were to say in what sense the Psalter may be said to be revealed, it would certainly not be so in the sense that its praise, supplication, and thanksgiving were placed in their disparate authors» mouths by God, but in the sense that the sentiments expressed there are formed by and conform to their object.

There was a Talmudic - era rabbi by the name of Akiva ben Joseph (who argued plenty with another rabbi, Simeon ben Azzai) who argued that the greatest commandment in all of the Torah was to love your neighbor as yourself (to which ben Azzai objected primarily due to neighbor not being clear enough and then said that the greatest commandment was within Genesis 5:1 — that man was created in G - d's image and thus if you hate any person, you are hating G - d).

If we ask now for the material content of this self - understanding, the only adequate answer is that it is an understanding of ourselves and all others as alike objects of the unbounded love of God, which is to say, of the inclusive whole of ultimate reality of which both the self and others are parts.

Woudl you object if our currency said «in leprauchans we trust»?

However, if you only object to the fact that I said it, please understand that I do not buy into the whole «it is immoral to be skeptical of the Catholic religion» argument.

If he applies this consistently, it would seem that he would have to say that God's primordial orderings of eternal objects are also unconscious and presumably also his primordial appraisal of developments from each possible state of the world.

Even if a person says they are «secular», they still believe in materialism, worship money, objects, etc..

It does not follow that, if the light of God blazed forth in such unique splendor in Jesus — as Radhakrishnan puts it very beautifully — we should not object if the followers, «say, of Confucius and of Buddha, set up similar claims for their heroes.»

Whitehead would meet this contention through having a hierarchy from sense objects to perceptual objects, to physical objects, to scientific objects, with more and more abstraction and interpretation, at each stage and he can only get away with what he says about pure sense objects if he makes them far more primitive than one normally thinks sense objects are.

If we discard this definition of a people, and, assuming another, say that a people is an assemblage of reasonable beings bound together by a common agreement as to the objects of their love, then, in order to discover the character of any people, we have only to observe what they love... it will be a superior people in proportion as it is bound together by higher interests, inferior in proportion as it is bound together by lower.

They agreed that he had shown the way but objected to his arrogance: «If someone does not say what he says or if someone wishes to say more than he says then he is banished and condemned as a heretic.&raquIf someone does not say what he says or if someone wishes to say more than he says then he is banished and condemned as a heretic.&raquif someone wishes to say more than he says then he is banished and condemned as a heretic.»

If I say that's how dog [sic] speaks to me, well, then you have no right to object.

However, if you only object to the fact that I said it, please understand that I do not buy into the whole «it is immoral to be skeptical of the Catholic religion» nonsense.

This is due partly to another devilish characteristic of the game: if a bowl is rolled slowly toward its object (requiring, say, 18 seconds to reach the jack) the green is said to be «fast»; if the bowl is rolled quickly (10 seconds to cover the same distance) the green is «slow.»

If money was no object I'd say Higuain but Arsene won't spend that sort of money.

And that something — let's say it loud — is imagining what objects would look like if they were rotated.»

And they did not buy an infant pants, sweater and jacket outfit they saw for $ 76, although Moss, 32, a medical laboratory representative, said they would not object if relatives bought it for them.

If they are different colors say the names of the colors and if you happen to have animals / objects for beads you can say the nameIf they are different colors say the names of the colors and if you happen to have animals / objects for beads you can say the nameif you happen to have animals / objects for beads you can say the names!

If money was no object, Harris said a pool is an «outstanding recreational use» because it serves all walks of life.

Research shows that children learn language faster if you point to an object while saying the word.

Incorporating actions — e.g., if character jumps, jump with your child while saying jump can also be a fun way to engage your child and help make connections between words, pictures, and actions / objects.

If your roving toddler does head toward an unacceptable or dangerous play object, calmly say «No» and either remove your child from the area or distract him or her with another activity.

If your child always says muh when he wants milk, it means that he understands this sound stands for a specific object — that yummy white stuff.

The scientist - authored book Authoritative Parenting, which Sax references in his book, points out that authoritative parents should be willing to negotiate and change their demands when their children reasonably object and that it is authoritarian parents who, «if challenged, threaten punishment and give «because I say so» as a reason for compliance.»