Sentences with phrase «if scenarios so»

There are many what - if scenarios so the future is still unclear.

Not exact matches

«It just seems so natural,» says Maurin, «but if I throw back to the corporate environments I've worked in, it's a completely different scenario.»

In the article I made the point that VC investors seldom value profitability if it comes with slow growth so forcing yourself to be profitable is wise in three specific scenarios:

In checks on the financial strength of the country's four main banks - National Bank of Greece, Piraeus, Alpha Bank and Eurobank - the ECB determined that even if the economy performs as forecast, the banks would need almost 4.4 billion euros ($ 4.8 billion) and more than 14 billion if it performs worse than expected, in a so - called «adverse scenario».

So if we have the same scenario as above, except only $ 5,000,000 worth of damage was incurred, you'd only get paid out the percentage insured amount, which would be 50 % or $ 2,500,000.

«So I think with gold sitting here at about $ 1,320 or so, you have a great risk reward where you could probably target somewhere in the mid - 1,400 s if a bull flag scenario does in fact follow.&raquSo I think with gold sitting here at about $ 1,320 or so, you have a great risk reward where you could probably target somewhere in the mid - 1,400 s if a bull flag scenario does in fact follow.&raquso, you have a great risk reward where you could probably target somewhere in the mid - 1,400 s if a bull flag scenario does in fact follow.»

The facts are not right here, energy is cheap that means the cost of manufacturing and transporting of goods is low, food and consumers staples already more affordable, so what if a few American oil companies going out of business.the cost of producing oil in middle east is less than $ 10 / bl and we were paying more than $ 140 / bl for it, with that huge profit margin the big oil companies and oil producing nations became richer and the rest of us left behind, with the oil price this low the oil giants don't want to reduce the price at pump even a penny, because they are so greedy.worst case scenario is some CEOs bonuses might drop from $ 20 million to $ 15 millions I am sure they will survive.in terms of the stock market it always bounces back, after all it's just a casino like game.

If this happens, incoming payroll taxes will be enough to cover about three - fourths of promised benefits, so as a worst - case scenario, we're looking at a 25 % cut.

Consumers might see a benefit if the companies could develop a blueprint for curbing the surge in healthcare and drug costs while maintaining or enhancing patient care, a scenario that government and the industry so far have struggled to achieve.

So a trader holding this position MUST be prepared to act if the worst case scenario (sharply lower price and / or sharply higher IV) unfolds.

Part two: Poor returns later: In most scenarios the portfolio swelled so much in the golden years that it's still able to sustain your life style as your clock runs down, even if (/ when) the market eventually turns lower.

So it is important to think through the what - if scenarios when entering a conditional order.

Part of his job is avoiding the worst - case scenarios, and if he assumes he will be successful at doing so, he never will turn dark enough to satisfy the skeptics.

So, by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit) speak for themselveSo, by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit) speak for themselveso much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.

It just seems that the abrihamic god that people worship created us, purely to satisfy its whims, designed it so that we suffer if we don't satisfy his whims, engineers the scenario where we will disobey and not satify its whims, and then makes us suffer for what god orchestrated in the first place.

If you are educated and living in the 21st century, how then can you believe a book that is so patently foolish and so obviously a product of bronze age folk with little or no knowledge of the world and so full of inconsistencies and laughably foolish scenarios and notably misogynistic and brutal and racist and intolerant stories?

And if you don't, so that according to Berry's own terms most communities will remain basically subject to the market even in the wildest scenarios of Porcher victory, you can not seriously talk of getting beyond Lockean liberalism, nor talk so critically of it that it appears «getting beyond» is an option.

Ross told reporters, «[We're done with] that kind of «what if» scenario that previous shows sort of played around with from a storytelling perspective, [so] we're just looking forward now, and focusing on science and research.»

I guess you could say that either scenario has its dangers.I always opt to lean on the Holy Spirit over man, so if I fall, that is God's responsibility.

If you're nervous, halve the recipe so if it doesn't turn out the worst case scenario is you lose 1 cup of sugaIf you're nervous, halve the recipe so if it doesn't turn out the worst case scenario is you lose 1 cup of sugaif it doesn't turn out the worst case scenario is you lose 1 cup of sugar.

Per is very slow, I wish he was faster atimes but ppl under rate him a lot and please football is not all about pace; Per plays with his brains and we tend to applaud players who play with more aggression unfortunately he doesn't; I will use an eg, if it was Per marking Hazard instead of Koscielny in d build up to the chelsea penalty, he would have probably gone backwards trying to stay on d right side of hazard so he doesn't shoot and narrowing d angle so that our goalie easily picks up d ball, that's how Per plays and to me that's subtle but intelligent option in that scenario but that style of play doesn't get plenty credit.

i understand the reasoning of babyplease for example that this way he wont get the playing experience, but thats one of the biggest thing i critisize peope / footballer of countries like england germany switzerland etc. that its made too easy for them, and that they are treated like babies / stars if its too difficult we want to change the scenario so that its better and easier for him..

So, if it goes some combo of Ayton, Doncic, JJJ, Bagley, Bamba, we then have to consider risking a Porter pick (not my favorite option), swinging for the fences on Trae, or the more likely scenario due to GarPax tendencies, take the safe route in Bridges.

I don't know, but for the past 8 years, hundreds if not thousands of basketball players have been eligible, and none have approached his value, this suggests that the odds of improving are sufficiently close to zero so as to rule out that scenario; ditto Kevin Durant.

I mean there is less than 1 % chance of all the players being fit together as long as wenger is there - he just can not seem to fix it... so if wenger stays, we should consider the injury scenario as a given and plan our transfers - alas even that does not happen.

So, even if he can get in the paint, it's a good risk - reward scenario for the opposition.

I imagine we will also be drafting a RB at some point so If they don't pan out or Foreman and a rookie looks better than expected, we basically have the option to cut the vet or Miller based on the scenario and still have plenty of depth.

I'm so curious to see what we do — in a trade down scenario, It would be nice for us to get our hands on McGlinchey and solve the right tackle problem — also would be nice if we could grab McGlinchey and a solid guard.

Wow, i wouldn't be surprised if this scenario was planned out a year ago or so ago.??

In this scenario, Hamilton would have had to have been so indifferent or aloof — if not actively poisonous — that it would have been impossible for the Angels to carry on.

Really??? so how do you explain the farcical 40 million and # 1 scenario????? keep your opinion if you think your right but watch and see what happens, could have had Higuain?

I would play Sanchez if even for 1 minute at the end unless we are losing 4 - 0 so that if in unlikely scenario we beat chelski then he cant play against for Man City in the final... that would really be the most stupid thing ever if we sold him and allowed that to happen!

I just hope this has been on the cards for a while and if so we have a replacement or 2 secured already if this gets over the line it's the best scenario for everyone I think.

like I've said before, Wenger is simply stating that Sanchez is staying so that he can regain some leverage when it comes time to make a deal and to shift the focus back squarely on Sanchez... this is 101 tactics in PR management... the very fact that he even mentioned RVP's name speaks to the utterance arrogance of a man that believes he answers to no one... before you harshly judge Sanchez think carefully about what the ultimate intentions of both parties involved... Sanchez wants to win trophies and get paid generously for his efforts, whereas the club wants to pull the wool over our eyes once again so that we blame the player for wanting the very things we told him we wanted when we brought him in... how many times do we have to go down this road before we realize the only common factor in each of these scenarios is the club itself... trust me, if we showed any ambition Sanchez's contract demands would be much different... just like in other major sports players will take a «home town» discount if they see those in charge making a truly honest attempt to fight for the highest honours in their respective fields... that being said, if they see a team trying to make disparaging remarks about them in the press and not following through on their promises, they will likely try to make them pay a premium for their services or seek greener pastures... btw if anyone simply looks at the score versus Bayern today and thinks that even for a second that this was a deserved victory, just watch the game and judge for yourself... actually save yourself the anguish and just know that if it weren't for Cech and Martinez this could have been a repeat of our Champions League flopping or worse

Happy with our stance no risk no reward, and if the worst case scenarios as you say happen then so be it, I won't dwell on it I just want Every player to give everything he has to the shirt, a desire to win and that's all season long no more ups and downs.

So the bar for what the Rangers will begrudgingly accept for Darvish is lower than it would have been if this scenario played out a year ago, though, that doesn't mean he'll come cheap.

I would be dissapointed if I wasnt so used to the scenario.

If that's the worst case scenario then so be it.

So we're worried for our old pal Houllier, who could find himself manager of a team inside the relegation zone if results conspire against him at the weekend, although that would seem a very unlikely scenario.

If we buy a world class DM we will also get a world class CM in fabregas so its kll two birds with one stone scenario.

It might be easiest to start with a semi-public situation, and then work your way up to other scenarios if and when you feel comfortable doing so.

There are so many scenarios and personal specifics that it's hard for me to advise you except to say that it sounds like you are an experienced mom and if you see a benefit from something — go for it!

However, as in scenario 1 but not so starkly, it is hard (if not impossible) to imagine that the Liberal Democrats would walk out and force another general election because they could not secure greater cuts to public services.

Phil Bloomer, Oxfam campaigns and policy director, said: «We have the knowledge, resources and technology to tackle climate change and avert worst - case scenarios - if we choose to do so.

Why would Britain enter into currency union so it can shackle itself to an independent state but still have to bail it out if things go pear shaped — a not unrealistic scenario given Salmond's judgement?

The interesting finding is the Lib Dems — in the two scenarios where they are the only party offering a second referendum their support goes up to 19 % or 22 % (if Labour also offer a referendum the Lib Dems don't gain nearly so much).

Asked if she expected Ukip to run have Labour so close, she said: «To be honest with you I have been through more or less every scenario.

Cuomo has made his threat so clear that lawmakers and the powerful interests that have depended upon them wonder if Cuomo's preferred scenario is to impose his budget.

The participants were paid based on their choices in just one of these scenarios, but they did not know which one — so they had to play all 120 as if they were real.

With the additional data that we have and will keep collecting, we will be able to establish if this particular decay agrees or not with the very clear prediction from the Standard Model, and so we will be able to discover or constrain new physics scenarios.»