Sentences with phrase «if scenarios with»

You can jump into the app and do some what - if scenarios with the handy sliders.

Tasks include using formula to discover the number of items in the 12 days of Christmas (Nice idea to play the song at this point), Charting people's favourite Christmas gift and using What If scenarios with Elf payroll.

Not exact matches

It's based on the writings of Carl Jung and categorizes people into one of 16 different four - letter types using a series of agree - or - disagree scenarios, such as, «you tend to be unbiased even if it might endanger your good relations with people» or «failing to complete your task on time makes you uncomfortable.»

In the article I made the point that VC investors seldom value profitability if it comes with slow growth so forcing yourself to be profitable is wise in three specific scenarios:

If you find yourself with such a scenario, break down your BHAG (Big Hairy Audacious Goal) into smaller bites you can actually chew.

At the other end of the spectrum, if the worst case scenario is true, then the CBC was faced with the prospect of an employee being potentially charged with multiple accounts of both common and sexual assault.

If you have a specific, relevant and compelling offer that addresses the biggest pain or most desirable outcome of the scenario, you will find yourself connecting with many more ideal customers to work with in the future.

It's clear now that if I had continued to pretend that I was asking for input, I would eventually lose credibility as a leader with my team — which is about the worst - case scenario you can experience as a boss.

«So I think with gold sitting here at about $ 1,320 or so, you have a great risk reward where you could probably target somewhere in the mid - 1,400 s if a bull flag scenario does in fact follow.»

The Bank even included a grimmer «what - if» scenario with oil flat - lining at $ 50 — this figure shows how bad that might be for Canada compared with no oil price drop.

If it's a marketing position, give them a couple of real - life scenarios that your company has dealt with and see how they would respond.

Scenario: You're working with a prospect to craft a deal and suddenly the customer demands something that makes no business sense, like: «We'll need you to stop doing business with our competitors if you're doing business with us.»

The facts are not right here, energy is cheap that means the cost of manufacturing and transporting of goods is low, food and consumers staples already more affordable, so what if a few American oil companies going out of business.the cost of producing oil in middle east is less than $ 10 / bl and we were paying more than $ 140 / bl for it, with that huge profit margin the big oil companies and oil producing nations became richer and the rest of us left behind, with the oil price this low the oil giants don't want to reduce the price at pump even a penny, because they are so greedy.worst case scenario is some CEOs bonuses might drop from $ 20 million to $ 15 millions I am sure they will survive.in terms of the stock market it always bounces back, after all it's just a casino like game.

Tell me if you're familiar with this scenario:

It might be, if you find yourself identifying with one of the following scenarios.

While you may not need them in all scenarios (e.g. customers who already want to talk to you), incentives give people a reason to participate in an interview if they don't have a relationship with you.

If that scenario plays out, we will be looking at a possible short sale entry into $ CAR, with the expectation of an eventual move back down to the $ 30 - $ 34 area.

With the accounts you have with Wealthfront and combined with linked external accounts, they create a «what - if» scenarWith the accounts you have with Wealthfront and combined with linked external accounts, they create a «what - if» scenarwith Wealthfront and combined with linked external accounts, they create a «what - if» scenarwith linked external accounts, they create a «what - if» scenarios.

Net net, if you are going to concern yourself with the outlier scenarios on the down side, you should also balance them out with the other equally unlikely outcomes.

[01:10] Introduction [02:45] James welcomes Tony to the podcast [03:35] Tony's leap year birthday [04:15] Unshakeable delivers the specific facts you need to know [04:45] What James learned from Unshakeable [05:25] Most people panic when the stock market drops [05:45] Getting rid of your fear of investing [06:15] Last January was the worst opening, but it was a correction [06:45] You are losing money when you sell on corrections [06:55] Bear markets come every 5 years on average [07:10] The greatest opportunity for a millennial [07:40] Waiting for corrections to invest [08:05] Warren Buffet's advice for investors [08:55] If you miss the top 10 trading days a year... [09:25] Three different investor scenarios over a 20 year period [10:40] The best trading days come after the worst [11:45] Investing in the current world [12:05] What Clinton and Bush think of the current situation [12:45] The office is far bigger than the occupant [13:35] Information helps reduce fear [14:25] James's story of the billionaire upset over another's wealth [14:45] What money really is [15:05] The story of Adolphe Merkle [16:05] The story of Chuck Feeney [16:55] The importance of the right mindset [17:15] What fuels Tony [19:15] Find something you care about more than yourself [20:25] Make your mission to surround yourself with the right people [21:25] Suffering made Tony hungry for more [23:25] By feeding his mind, Tony found strength [24:15] Great ideas don't interrupt you, you have to pursue them [25:05] Never - ending hunger is what matters [25:25] Richard Branson is the epitome of hunger and drive [25:40] Hunger is the common denominator [26:30] What you can do starting right now [26:55] Success leaves clues [28:10] What it means to take massive action [28:30] Taking action commits you to following through [29:40] If you do nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for you?

The best scenario for your business is to not have any, but if your business does, it is better if judgments or liens are not recent or consistent and if the dollar amount associated with each is low.

Although broadcasters ostensibly must direct the money they receive only toward costs associated with the spectrum auction, the likely scenario remains that the FCC will remain unable to detect and stop waste, fraud and abuse if the funds are used instead to upgrade their equipment in pursuit of ATSC 3.0.

This week's cover of the German magazine Der Spiegel featured a defaced 1 euro coin with the title «If the Euro Breaks Up — a Scenario.»

This is the scenario we are told and it may have worked in the past but with savings accounts / CD's yielding 1 - 2 % in most cases, if you follow this scenario you might actually be LOSING money every year even though you are doing everything «the right way».

Once you fully analyze NAFTA's effects on your business, understand the potential new costs and legal changes that would come into place if the deal is terminated, talk to the businesses you work with and develop new plans, your business will be ready for even the worst case scenario.

At which allocation a portfolio fall of 40 % is not totally out of the question; a real problem if it happens early in drawdown and hasn't at least been notionally planned for with a «what if» scenario.

If this is his methodology or his mechanism for communicating with the world, we really don't have an alternative but to start there, even in scenarios right now where we see that the market doesn't necessarily give much of a concern to the details, the ins and outs that he might be speaking to.

If the conclusion of the Fed's program pulled out the legs from the market, we might end up with a «sell - in - May - and - go - away» type scenario.

If companies are not in sync with understanding possible scenarios and outcomes, then they will be left out of the picture.

«If we do end up with a much warmer - than - normal winter, the bullish scenario for prices would -LSB-...]

In such a scenario, having more experiences with employees and experts would increase the ability of consumers to recall such interactions, and, if they are positive, increase trust.

He also pointed out that even if what happened with Daniels was the sort of thing that was very common for Cohen as part of his duties, the Daniels scenario could still be a contribution if Cohen understood it would aid Trump's electoral effort.

At first glance it seems to be a Romney nightmare scenario: Which leads to Romney's nightmare scenario: If things don't turn around for Romney soon, those super PACs may give up on the task of electing Romney as president and turn to the task of encircling Obama's second term with a....

So, by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.

If the sequester happens, the most likely scenario (as I see it) is that public pressure will result in some House Republicans allying with the House Democrats and a large majority in the Senate to restore the cuts after some face saving compromise that doesn't save the Republicans much face.

I also gather that if God did have any issues with slavery he didn't think it worth spelling out the scenarios under which is was and wasn't all right because, after all, it just wasn't that big a deal.

No different than my rambling post agreeing with him and providing even more real life human scenarios that can evoke strong emotions, that can easily cause someone to either A: Seek out religion, even if it's only for some semblance of accepttion and / or explanation of the unknown, or B: If they already have a religion, re-embracing it with new enthusiasif it's only for some semblance of accepttion and / or explanation of the unknown, or B: If they already have a religion, re-embracing it with new enthusiasIf they already have a religion, re-embracing it with new enthusiasm.

I once asked Israel's director of religious communities if he was aware of the implications of the alliance with fundamentalist Christians, particularly in light of their history of anti-Semitism, their dedication to the Christianizing of America, and the «convert or fry» Armageddon scenarios.

But if we do not follow this scenario, if we stay with means of production that are more labor - intensive, others who do follow the scenario will underprice us and put us out of business altogether.

Let me make it clear: I have deliberately not asked, even off the record, any of the Ordinariate monsignori if they agree with what I might call the «Thompson scenario».

You could postulate a million plus similar scenarios: «if God commanded the Holocaust,» «If God commanded a cult leader to murder his followers,» «If God commanded a serial killer to go on a rampage,» etc. but the issue with each of these scenarios, is that they present a false god who is not the Christian Goif God commanded the Holocaust,» «If God commanded a cult leader to murder his followers,» «If God commanded a serial killer to go on a rampage,» etc. but the issue with each of these scenarios, is that they present a false god who is not the Christian GoIf God commanded a cult leader to murder his followers,» «If God commanded a serial killer to go on a rampage,» etc. but the issue with each of these scenarios, is that they present a false god who is not the Christian GoIf God commanded a serial killer to go on a rampage,» etc. but the issue with each of these scenarios, is that they present a false god who is not the Christian God.

Case law begins with specific examples that don't necessarily present best - case scenarios: «if two men quarrel» or «if someone strikes a man» are examples of case law.

If black hole after all the scenario of quantum mechanical process have completed their interactions behave accordingly to Relativity equation to became eventually a tiny speck in space of high intensity mass with very strong gravitation wave could the telescope have picked up such polarization of light from some gravitated wave of dying star or black hole.

The best scenario is if they listen to you the first time, but if they do not, then you must take others with you to help convince them.

If there were a broad set of initial conditions consistent with the development of complex structures and a thin scattering of islands of life here and there, then yes, this would be a scenario in which life could be regarded as a random outcome.

If you are educated and living in the 21st century, how then can you believe a book that is so patently foolish and so obviously a product of bronze age folk with little or no knowledge of the world and so full of inconsistencies and laughably foolish scenarios and notably misogynistic and brutal and racist and intolerant stories?

Ross told reporters, «[We're done with] that kind of «what if» scenario that previous shows sort of played around with from a storytelling perspective, [so] we're just looking forward now, and focusing on science and research.»

I'm not sure if this stems from position - paranoid pastors and seeps into congregations or if it starts with the congregation and moves to the pastor for fear of their job security (it's an unanswerable chicken / egg scenario).

Given that many of his posts seem to have targeted that root issue in a variety of ways, and given that this is the issue at the root of the scenarios that you propose that he * should * have been addressing in the past, I think it is safe to say that if you have been reading his blog, David actually has (indirectly) been dealing with those issues.

He said he suspects that «Left Behind» theology attempts to harmonize this Jesus saying with Paul's colorful imagery of believers being caught up, or raptured, into the clouds in 1 Thessalonians 4:16 - 17, as if the two scenarios envisioned the same thing.