Sentences with phrase «if sun»

Imagine what would happen if the sun changed by 1 - 2 %.

RACookPE1978 says: July 31, 2011 at 1:54 pm That is, if the sun is assumed to be in free - fall, with its center of gravity driving / falling / moving «straight» through the cosmos as you've previously held, then the planets are NOT in free - fall.

Imagine what would happen if the sun changed by 1 - 2 % in this century.

«Thus if the sun remains «out», i.e., stuck for a long period in the current solar minimum, it can offset only about 7 years of CO2 increase.

And this is the reason why we will not have a look into the future and seeing now if our sun exploded within the next 16 minutes.

The paper uses a fully coupled climate model to simulate what would happen if the sun fell to Maunder Minimum levels in the 21st Century.

IF the sun really has started a couple of slower than average solar cycles, and IF the current slight cooling trend continues or becomes even more pronounced over the next couple of decades, we can bury the CAGW scare, along with all the other doomsday scenarios and scares that preceded it.

How would the Earth's climate respond if the sun did enter another Maunder Minimum?

Furthermore, if the Sun was the cause, the whole atmosphere would be warming (i.e. from the outside inwards).

If the sun were the dominant forcing, the planet would have a negative energy balance in 2005 — 2010, when solar irradiance was at its lowest level in the period of accurate data, i.e., since the 1970s [64], [71].

If the sun were «turned off,» the temperature of the atmosphere would be with only 28 °C above absolute zero, viz. - 245 °C.

If the sun's energy is decreasing while the Earth is warming, then the sun can't be the main control of the temperature.

How about this one: earth's core is molten iron - magnetic north can move around and invert according to the fossil record - the earths magnetism gives us the magnetosphere in the same way the sun's magnetism gives us the heliosphere - if the sun's electromagnet had a 11 year periodicity - some kind of resonance - then its magnetic strength could wax and wane - even better - it could be connected to Jupiter's magnetic field properties.

If the sun goes to it's average range during the next cycle then all of those temperature records are guaranteed to be broken by even larger margins.

If the sun goes quiet for 50 years will thermometers fall?

So daytime temperature should reach around the moon's surface temperature of 120 C. On moon if the sun is blocked for two hour one lose about 100 K. Or lower from 120 C to 20 C. Roughly, with bare rock, I would guess two hour after sun goes down one should have surface temperature of around 20 C. And probably rest of nite it cool another 50 K.

If the sun comes up every morning in the east, you will argue that it comes up in the west.

If the Sun is not the cause of the slight increases in average temperature observed and it is truly CO2 «trapping heat» then we have the unusual paradox of a system radiating less while it is warming.

Also, we can't affect the sun but we can affect CO2 so even if the Sun was the main driver, since we can't do anything about it, we might as well move on to the second strongest driver and so on..

A given location on the equator of Venus cools by about 5 degrees during its 4 - month - long night, and so Venus could have cooled right down if the Sun were not shining during its daytime and warming the troposphere and the surface back up again by the same 5 degrees, or whatever it is.

and see if the sun keeps getting cooler... but in the meantime, the measured energy budget keeps getting warmer... the energy continues to go into the ocean.

If the sun continues to be in a longer solar minimum than the usual 11 year cycles and that causes negative forcing — so be it.

and guess what ---- the Sun» w output that does vary is figured in as a constant -------- we all have heard about the 11 year sun spot cycle and its related sun's output variations ------ that is not included in any model for it would prove that C02 is that the driving factor ------ but the sun's output -------- note the warmth of the sun on a hot summer day -------- if the sun varies 0.1 % it will effect the temperature on earth, and also Mars ------

If the sun stays quiet, cloud amounts should increase further then, after a while due to oceanic lag, global air temperatures should begin to fall.

Disturbingly, the data tells us as well, what will happen with temperatures and agriculture, if the sun falls into another Maunder Minimum with the next solar cycle, as it did during the little ice age.

If the sun «dunnit» in the early 20thC, the same sun could also have «dunnit» in the late 20thC.

If the Sun is about half way through its life, other events may intervene before 10 billion years have elapsed.

From this graph it should be crystal clear, what will happen, if the sun slips into a Maunder style minimum again.

Pretty much all of the rest of the Earth's thermal buffering system would relax to temperatures well under 200K in a matter of weeks if the Sun disappeared overnight.

«A second smoking gun is that if the sun were responsible for global warming, we would expect to see warming throughout all layers of the atmosphere, from the surface all the way up to the upper atmosphere (stratosphere).

If the Sun causes the tropopause to rise in the diurnal cycle then work is done raising the centre of mass of the atmosphere.

Does he think that if the sun was responsible for late 20th century warming then the planet would have been the same temperature when the sun was previously at similar levels, regardless of the state of the ocean heat sink?

Geothermal heat pump system runs 24/7/365 days a year regardless if the sun shines or wind blows.

If the sun somehow warms the earth, and the earth radiates longwave that is increasingly trapped by increasing CO2, we still have an AGW situation of some or other magnitude.

If sun was much cooler, then there wouldn't be any UV light, and visible light would weaker per nw of wavelenght, and the IR light would not weaken as much.

Gerald: < br / > If the sun was the primary source heating the earth then the temperature would get colder the deeper we dig.

If the Sun's temperature was 4000 K, it would emitting far less visible light - it would slightly warmer than an incandescent light bulb - therefore around 10 % of light would visible light rather than about 1/2 of the energy being visible light.

If our sun was a much hotter star, the UW per each nw would be more powerful than visible light.

The question is not if the sun is responsible for the observations but rather how.)

What is interesting here is Muscheler's new argument that if the sun had caused late 20th century warming then the planet should have warmed steadily since 1950.

So temperature of lunar surface during day is the sun temperature if the sun diameter increased to Earth / Moon distance but was also emitting the same total energy as the current sun does at it's much smaller diameter.

I have read somewhere that if the sun would stop shining, it would take centuries for the earth to cool down till about zero.

If the heat leaves the atmosphere its gets cold if it heats nothing will stop it i.e. if the sun cooks us it cooks us.

If the sun is to shine again we must amplify the voices that decry the primacy of market solutions and the deliberate shutting out of real and humane reduction alternatives.

If the sun is primarily responsible for observed global air temperature changes (even if heavily modulated by ocean behaviour as I contend elsewhere) then we need to know sooner rather than later otherwise a misdiagnosis of the causes of climate change could cause unimaginable disruption and hardship through the imposition of incorrect remedies.

So even if the sun's down, you can still power your home with sun power.

If the Sun is only 6,000 °C and it is 93 million miles away..

When solar activity falls, energy comes out of the ocean, not just over the period of the decline of a single 11 year solar cycle, but if the Sun stays low in activity terms, for many years.

If the Sun were to disappear, all the planets would in due course become very cold indeed.

[1] Omanuel https://judithcurry.com/2012/12/01/open-thread-weekend-4/#comment-273003 (Clearly, if the sun is made of Iron, the Earth's core must be made of hydrogen to get the correct proportions of elements in the universe)