Sentences with phrase «if the benefits far»

Not exact matches

If you're a student and / or have access to a university email and save 50 % on the yearly fee with Prime Student or you share your Amazon Prime and most benefits with family members via Amazon Household, your dollar stretches even further.

If you take on a job, be sure the total compensation package and social benefits far outweigh the opportunity costs your business will incur.

Even if his personal interest in nation - building didn't go far beyond its ability to benefit his bank account, he never wavered in his commitment to seeing a transcontinental transportation artery to completion.

Further, homeowners can only deduct interest on the mortgage for their principal residence, meaning you won't benefit from this tax break if you have a vacation home.

But it has other benefits, including a wide investment selection, and if you don't have a 401 (k) at work, an IRA is far and away the next best thing.

Of course, if that happens, the benefits to society far outweigh the loss for Geico, and Buffett acknowledged this.

What if we took things a step further and offered additional benefits?

If you're able to configure your profile in a way that makes it clear who you are, what type of product or service you provide and how it will benefit your ideal customer as a result, sales are far easier to make on LinkedIn.

If not, how far off is the benefit?

Further, if bitcoin is able to reach its goal of becoming a reliable micropayments service, content publishers will be among those that benefit the most, meaning the Sun - Times is likely to be far from the last major newspaper to implement bitcoin payments.

He said he would accept the inclusion of «sexual orientation» in the Canadian Human Rights Act if it were «clearly defined, but not if it were used as a precedent for further benefits like marital status,» the magazine stated.

Consumers might see a benefit if the companies could develop a blueprint for curbing the surge in healthcare and drug costs while maintaining or enhancing patient care, a scenario that government and the industry so far have struggled to achieve.

So take it one step further: If obvious benefits flow from helping the male component of the workforce achieve its potential, why in the world wouldn't you want to include its counterpart?

There are certain market segments that are more sensitive to changes in monetary policy and may benefit if the Fed delays liftoff further.

You'll do far better if you supplement Social Security benefits with pensions, savings, investments and an emergency fund.

Further, if the death benefit exceeds the policy cash surrender value, the proceeds received by the beneficiary after the client's death will also be income tax - free.

Who could benefit: if you want intellectual confidence that sovereign defaults / currency failures can happen even in the US (note we have had two so far, in addition to many other financial crises), this will give you confidence that you are not a nut.

But your monthly benefit will be less than if you waited until 66 to take it, and your benefit will be reduced further if you continue to work and earn more than the annual limit prescribed by Uncle Sam.

Alan Williams, former head of the initiative at National Defence, says that the Conservatives» agreement will benefit Canada's industry far less than if there had been a public bidding process.

So far, the IRS also hasn't ruled if cryptocurrencies can benefit from a like - kind exchange, says Mike Slack, lead tax research analyst at The Tax Institute at H&R Block.

If you believe that your employment agreement entitles you to something greater, or that you have a claim regarding this benefit, please contact us for further discussion.

Here is the bottom line as far as I can see: IF you are self - employed when filing for early retirement, and *** if, on your application, you are asked how many hours you work *** (and I would like to hear from anybody here who has actually filed for benefits before their Full Retirement Age) and IF you work more than the allowable hours to be considered «retired» (again, I believe it's no more than 45 for most people but no more than 15 if you work at an occupation requiring a «specific skill» or own a large businessIF you are self - employed when filing for early retirement, and *** if, on your application, you are asked how many hours you work *** (and I would like to hear from anybody here who has actually filed for benefits before their Full Retirement Age) and IF you work more than the allowable hours to be considered «retired» (again, I believe it's no more than 45 for most people but no more than 15 if you work at an occupation requiring a «specific skill» or own a large businessif, on your application, you are asked how many hours you work *** (and I would like to hear from anybody here who has actually filed for benefits before their Full Retirement Age) and IF you work more than the allowable hours to be considered «retired» (again, I believe it's no more than 45 for most people but no more than 15 if you work at an occupation requiring a «specific skill» or own a large businessIF you work more than the allowable hours to be considered «retired» (again, I believe it's no more than 45 for most people but no more than 15 if you work at an occupation requiring a «specific skill» or own a large businessif you work at an occupation requiring a «specific skill» or own a large business),

If you're far too overwhelmed with outstanding debt obligations, it's likely that you could benefit from the loan forgiveness provided by declaring bankruptcy.

The billions of dollars already being spent on CSR and corporate philanthropy would generate far more benefit to both business and society if consistently invested using the principles we have outlined.

If the Release Requirements are not satisfied as of the 52 nd day after the Termination Date, then you shall not be entitled to any payments or benefits that are conditioned on a release and the Company and its Affiliates shall have no further obligations in connection therewith.

Thus we support a reduction in the speed limit because it will «save 7,466 lives every year,» though we would not do so if we recognized that such a law merely reduces the probability that an individual will die in a car accident from.0005 to.0004, a benefit too trivial to be noticed and, for any individual faced with the choice, far below the value of the additional driving time it entails.

She said that shortfall will grow if inflation rises further with «damaging consequences for children», adding: «With the return of inflation the benefits freeze has become toxic for struggling families.»

The benefit however will be a moral compass that we all share, If we all had and new the right ways to act and to treat people, this world would be a far better place.

If you think that birth control doesn't provide a benefit, such as alleviation of menstrual migraines, endometriosis, PMDD, and prevention of menorrhagia, then your nose has been buried in the wrong book for far too long.

Statistically, if there even is a god, it is far more likely that one of faith has chosen (or been taught without the benefit of making an actual personal choice) the wrong god to believe in or the wrong set of tenets ascribed to that particular god or that the one true religion has either gone extinct or hasn't been formulated yet.

And if they want to float in the Dead Sea — not far from the baptism site — enjoy its unusual buoyancy and the benefits of its unique mineral contents, they had better come soon.

Further, if you're a business owner, HR, benefits or other professional looking to partner with a dieting - for - dollars organization for a group initiative, there should be a step beyond Customer Support to make sure the endeavor is fruitful.

If you're not familiar with quinoa — it's a little more expensive to buy than rice, but the benefits of consuming quinoa far outweigh those of eating rice (brown or white).

It if often less enjoyable, as far as flavor is concerned, and it is of no benefit to losing weight or staying in shape.

If you want a chocolate ketogenic snack that provides additional benefits for your skin, hair, and nails; look no further.

It would further help if regulations were amended so farm co-operatives could spread waste co-digested with on - farm waste as long as both were pasteurised, and for more education about the benefits of digestate amongst farm end users and major supermarket buyers was available.

If there's a benefit to being the only driver so far to successfully navigate a playoff format where one bad race can lead to elimination, Harvick holds it.

If Barca make a cash + Rafinha bid for Bellerin we should sell him.We should also demand a satisfying amount.In the future if Rafinha wants to go too we can let the cycle continue.All we have to do is make sure we benefit from their talents.I still imagine what if Wenger had accepted the Thiago Alcantara and Bojan + cash bid for Fabregas.They could've have been far better than they are today under Wenger had he accepted the offer years back.Let's not make the same mistake with Bellerin.I don't know if he'll even be staying beyond next season.Bellerin is very expensive as of now and to me we should cash in.A player like Rafinha will definitely become a great player in Arsenal.He just needs his chances and can do that.At times you need to have foresight in business.It's not just about keeping the player you want to keep but also about doing everything possible to make sure you're always profitinIf Barca make a cash + Rafinha bid for Bellerin we should sell him.We should also demand a satisfying amount.In the future if Rafinha wants to go too we can let the cycle continue.All we have to do is make sure we benefit from their talents.I still imagine what if Wenger had accepted the Thiago Alcantara and Bojan + cash bid for Fabregas.They could've have been far better than they are today under Wenger had he accepted the offer years back.Let's not make the same mistake with Bellerin.I don't know if he'll even be staying beyond next season.Bellerin is very expensive as of now and to me we should cash in.A player like Rafinha will definitely become a great player in Arsenal.He just needs his chances and can do that.At times you need to have foresight in business.It's not just about keeping the player you want to keep but also about doing everything possible to make sure you're always profitinif Rafinha wants to go too we can let the cycle continue.All we have to do is make sure we benefit from their talents.I still imagine what if Wenger had accepted the Thiago Alcantara and Bojan + cash bid for Fabregas.They could've have been far better than they are today under Wenger had he accepted the offer years back.Let's not make the same mistake with Bellerin.I don't know if he'll even be staying beyond next season.Bellerin is very expensive as of now and to me we should cash in.A player like Rafinha will definitely become a great player in Arsenal.He just needs his chances and can do that.At times you need to have foresight in business.It's not just about keeping the player you want to keep but also about doing everything possible to make sure you're always profitinif Wenger had accepted the Thiago Alcantara and Bojan + cash bid for Fabregas.They could've have been far better than they are today under Wenger had he accepted the offer years back.Let's not make the same mistake with Bellerin.I don't know if he'll even be staying beyond next season.Bellerin is very expensive as of now and to me we should cash in.A player like Rafinha will definitely become a great player in Arsenal.He just needs his chances and can do that.At times you need to have foresight in business.It's not just about keeping the player you want to keep but also about doing everything possible to make sure you're always profitinif he'll even be staying beyond next season.Bellerin is very expensive as of now and to me we should cash in.A player like Rafinha will definitely become a great player in Arsenal.He just needs his chances and can do that.At times you need to have foresight in business.It's not just about keeping the player you want to keep but also about doing everything possible to make sure you're always profiting.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

If you drank ice - cold Celtic seawater, you'd have far greater benefits.

Instead of fixating on replacing Giroud to get maybe 4 - 6 extra goals a season (and contrary to accepted popular belief there are very few if any supporters who would be upset if an upgrade came in) why can't we a bit more imaginative about this; conceding 10 less goals could have won us the title just as easily, further refining our balance between defence and attack, building on the cohesion and fledgling confidence we have built - up may, just may, bring bigger benefits than ripping the spine of the team out and starting again.

He did nt get so much stick if Wenger has brought in someone far better, it will even benefit OG.

Overly reliant on Alexis Sanchez for goals this season, Arsenal could really benefit from Ramsey scoring again, and it will be far harder to play against the Gunners if they have players to hurt the opposition from a number of different parts of the pitch.

Ozil needs to be played more centrally if we hope to benefit from his creativity with the ball and Welbeck's first touch is far too sloppy to be played along side Lacazette... we need to find a formation which allows more service to those making runs from the middle of the pitch... Lacazette can not play so much with his back to goal or we're simply playing the same unsuccessful offensive scheme we played with Giroud, who is much better in that type of role... I can only hope we keep Sanchez and purchase a true defensive midfielder then switch to a 4 -4-1-1, which allows us to have Ozil play more centrally with Sead and Sanchez on the left side and Ox and Bellerin on the right, which would stretch defences so much that we could overwhelm most opponents with both runs in behind and overlapping runs out wide

Since their return from injury i have tried to give Welbeck and Wilshire the benefit of the doubt when others have slagged them off for some pretty average displays.Regrettably I am now of the opinion that they will never reach the standards required to make a meaningful contribution towards the revival of Arsenal and along with 3/4 others in the current squad they should be moved on.Their performances against Stoke was the last straw as far as I am concerned.It will be interesting to see if Gareth Southgate shares my views and does not include them in his World Cup squad.

Arteta is simply ageing so needs a successor, Schneiderlin seems that man and when / if we get him it would only benefit the club to have a player like Arteta around the team for a further season.

Only time and statistics will tell if Cepeda, whose 21 errors were by far the most of any first baseman in the NL, benefited from an accelerated spring campaign to improve his fielding.

The 19 - year - old was arguably the most impressive young defender in the Premier League last season and if he can develop further under the guidance of Louis Van Gaal he will benefit the English national side as well as Manchester United after they sold the experienced Patrice Evra to Juventus earlier in the summer.

What you're really weighing in this decision (if the series even gets this far) is the potential lost production from Price starting on short rest against the benefit of being able to use Marcus Stroman over R.A. Dickey in one of the remaining games.

Beyond that, most if not all of the aforementioned clubs will certainly return for him, willing to spend far more money than what's on offer right now, which would also benefit those at Celtic as well as the player.