Sentences with phrase «if the claim proves»

If its claims prove to be valid, it could bring significant benefits to the region.

Not exact matches

But they don't know enough, so if a tile says it is recyclable blah, blah, blah, it will often be bought over another product even if the claims of the manufacturer have not been proven or even tested.

If the restaurant claims something is gluten free, they certainly don't want a Nima - carrying customer to prove them wrong.

Even when such items are mentioned, Scroggin said, it can be difficult for heirs to prove provenance if another party disputes the claim — that this is mom's vase, for example, and not a newer one the deceased gifted to his second wife.

«Requiring the banks to pay treble damages to every plaintiff who ended up on the wrong side of an independent Libor ‐ denominated derivative swap would, if appellants» allegations were proved at trial, not only bankrupt 16 of the world's most important financial institutions, but also vastly extend the potential scope of antitrust liability in myriad markets where derivative instruments have proliferated,» the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York said in the ruling.A U.S. appeals court on Monday revived private antitrust litigation accusing major banks of conspiring to manipulate the Libor benchmark interest rate, in a big setback for their defense against investors» claims of market - rigging.

As if to prove this claim, federal Liberal leader Justin Trudeau announced that one plank of his election platform will be to realign the tax system to shift wealth away from those nasty one - percenters and down to the middle class.

If the claims about the coal mines are proved true, he added, «it would show that these companies can be ripped off or tricked.

Government - provided capital should be subordinate only to depositor claims, if equity and bondholder capital ultimately proves insufficient to meet those obligations.

If our records show that documents proving age or citizenship / lawful alien status have already been submitted for an earlier Medicare or Social Security claim (such as Disability, Supplemental Security Income, etc.), you do not need to submit the documents again.

If Waymo's claim proves true, it would seriously impact Uber's rapidly developing autonomous car efforts at a time when the ride - hailing company also is dealing with employee charges of sexism that have led CEO Travis Kalanick to order an internal investigation and search for a chief operating officer.

Religion can prove none of what it claims, and if you disagree with them, you're going to hell.

Hence, if it is irreducibly complex to have evolved by the mechanisms that have proven so effective in explaining other phenomenta — then what mechanism explains the origins of these other things claimed to be irreducibly complex?

Hey, look, what if a big invisible sky wizard chanted magic spells to make the universe and then sacrificed himself to himself to appease himself so he doesn't have torture you forever and ever in an eternal torture pit he made himself even though he claims to love you but won't take five seconds to prove himself beyond doubt like he decided to do with math and chemistry?

If he would fulfill my need, and prove he exists, I would pay more attention to what other people claim he wants and does not want, but at this point, he seems as invisible and irrelevant as Santa Claus.

Again, if you disagree with this, prove the only thing that makes gravity stick to a 9.8 constant is god keeping his finger on the button and back it up with evidence, or else you're just making baseless claims and still gettting angry at other people for backing up their claims with hard evidence when you can not.

If you are going to claim intelligent design, you certainly must prove the existence of a designer.

Even if Jesus existed it doesn't prove any of the supernatural claims made about him.

You ignore an important implication of the fact that there really are delusional people out there, that if anyone can be deluded the possibility exists that you are deluded, and the deluded never realize they are deluded, so the upshot is that your unverifiable claims prove nothing to anyone else.

For example, if I said JFK lived in the White House, staved off the Cuban Missile crisis, and could levitate and turn water into wine at will — then my proving that the White House really existed and the Cuban Missile crisis really happened is NOT evidence of the claim JFK could levitate or turn water into wine.

If we can't use scripture to prove that, then textbooks and writings of those who claim to be knowledgable should not be used to prove what knowledge is.

I await the evidence that you must have, because it would be a lie to claim to know that a god exists if you could not prove it.

Even if someone fails to prove that God exists, you can not claim to have enough information to say that God doesn't exist.

At least, the mirroring thesis serves to illustrate the claim that the order of concrescence is temporal, even if some alternative proves to be preferable.

If a person claims to be christian I have no choice but to believe them, as there is no way to measure or even prove any influence by a supernatural being.

And, if the claims of certain universal grammarians be proven true, we might need to go to the broadest comparative context of all — the human language capacity itself.

as for proving Jesus is alive, no worries, He will be back in the flesh as soon as all the prophecies of these days of distress are fulfilled, so stay alive until He arrives... however, should Death claim you before hand, you will know the truth anyway... and every aethist comes to know if God exists by the time of their funeral... unfortunately, they can't tell their friends the truth they have found then.So God is patient, for He knows the days of a man are short.

If you can not prove god exists, why should I believe your claim that it / he / she does?

That if they somehow prove evolution is false, then it makes their claims of God more likely.

Suffice it to say that if some clever chaps construct a machine that trounces our intellectual capacities, I shall be proved wrong and shall retract the claims in my article.

If you claim Kinsey to be a pedo it is up to you to prove that.

They claim if science can't prove something then it doesn't exist.

So the point of this is, atheists, is that if you're claiming someone is a lune for having God intereacting with them, it's similar to saying they're a lune for receiving a phone call from someone they know, because phone calls are selective too, they can consume someone's senses, and there's no guarantee that the person calling, will contact everyone over the planet... just to prove themself to someone that isn't a friend... or someone that doesn't love God.

If you claim there is a sky wizard, prove it.

If dogmatic theology really does prove beyond dispute that a God with characters like these exists, she may well claim to give a solid basis to religious sentiment.

If this was not your intention but you wish to stand by claiming that you have proved God does not exist because he couldn't do so and allow babies to be born without limbs then that is very interesting.

Robert Yet, if someone who went to church with you for decades was caught being a serial killer with 35 bodies buried in his backyard you'd probably claim that his actions prove that he wasn't really a Christian all along, so why pretend that behavior isn't part of the equation?

The doubter, then, who claims to have at his disposal a criterion by which he can prove whether God exists or not, will never see miracles; miracles can be seen only by the doubter who despairs of his own strength and ability to see God if God does not reveal Himself, but who is ready to let God speak to him.

Because if you are making a claim, then it is up to you to prove it.

Well, if we don't claim (and so don't need to try to prove) uniqueness for Jesus of Nazareth, how then do we justify giving him the role and authority of compass?

If they don't, you can't claim I have not proven it.

One side effect of the research I've done in writing the book, is that when somebody presents 10K verses to support their claim, I can write a short reply: «Thank you for providing so much scriptural support that conclusively proves my position, and demonstrates that your position has no basis in scripture», and, if challenged, go through each cited verse, and, using one or more specific techniques / methods of Bible study, show how the cited verse either refutes the position they present, or supports the position I present.

Every Pope claims to be the infallible representation of Gods hand on earth, so it is pretty funny that nearly every single one has changed things from his predecessor implying that the last Pope may not have had it exactly right... If science and education can't prove evolution to you, Christianity should at least be a good example of it socially.

The only defense the poster has provided is that same claim, plus the word «proven» at the end, as if that somehow magically made it so.

Yes that was my as.sertion, however I need not prove anything if you can't first «take on faith» that this man or woman is what they claim to be.

If a finely - tuned robot could mimic all human behaviors (including reporting what would be pain if it were human), then the mechanical naturalists would have proved their point that the brain is nothing more than computerized flesh» or so they claiIf a finely - tuned robot could mimic all human behaviors (including reporting what would be pain if it were human), then the mechanical naturalists would have proved their point that the brain is nothing more than computerized flesh» or so they claiif it were human), then the mechanical naturalists would have proved their point that the brain is nothing more than computerized flesh» or so they claim.

if you have some research to prove your claim, please provide it.

and no, he didn't ignore American's, considering they voted also... it wasn't only republitards American's voted for... now if you can prove me wrong, please list the web - site where this is shown, otherwise it's another stupid claim.

If you would like to claim that human life has some unproven magical quality that only those with certain other unproven magical qualities can end, then good luck proving those claims that you must first prove before even putting forth your argument.

If you intend to prove that your god is magically supplying some element for evolution to work as it does, then you'll need to demonstrate that claim..

If, one day, we somehow proved beyond all reaonable doubt that there is no god, christians would just claim that «god created doubt.»