Sentences with phrase «if the right policy»

Central bank governor Godwin Emefiele described Nigeria's recovery from its worst recession in over two decades as «fragile», warning the country «could relapse in a more protracted recession» if the right policies aren't put in place.

If the right policies are not put in place soon, we may find ourselves back where we started: with self - interested groups that benefit from the existing arrangement fighting the reforms that would bolster student learning.

But Ecosystem Marketplace's latest report on the voluntary and compliance markets shows forest carbon projects already having an impact an impact that could multiply if the right policy signals are sent.

Cities, islands and regions have proven that achieving 100 % renewable energy is not only feasible but also beneficial for the society, if the right policy framework facilitates the transformation.

15 May 2018 — Twenty - four million new jobs will be created globally by 2030 if the right policies to promote a greener economy are put in place, a new report by the International Labor Organization (ILO) says.

Not exact matches

This time, the conversation often turned to how the world will cope if the U.S. refuses to lead on issues from international trade to human rights to environmental policy.

Asking if the company is looking for government support, Kailas said, «We are not asking for subsidy, but just a right policy framework to work without hurdles.»

«We knew all along that this is exactly what you would see happening if we got the policy right, and we got the policy right,» said Sayegh.

«If you tax that $ 50 billion at 20 percent of imports — which is by the way a practice that 160 other countries do — right now our country's policy is to tax exports and let imports flow freely in, which is ridiculous.»

The second is that good policy works if you are pointing it the right direction.

Be sure to familiarize yourself with the policy, especially if you're on the fence about the purchase to begin with, or don't know if it's the right size, color, or variation.

Video uploaders could lose the right to ad money if they don't own the content or if their videos violate either AdSense or YouTube's policies.

«Even if you think Cohn was misguided or mistaken on policy issues, everything he did as Director of the National Economic Council he did for the right reasons,» Cramer said.

If countries implement the right set of policies for their domestic welfare, the whole world will get to benefit.

[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the other side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5 things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design for what you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us together?

Consult your investment professional to find out if this whole life insurance policy, which features a death benefit, is the right product for your financial situation.

If policy makers were confident that asset markets were at bubble level what is the right response?

Bond yields would be back at 6 percent in 24 hours if the Hungarian government enacted the right policies.

If it is a new era of faster growth and new investment opportunities, then the equilibrium real interest rate (the rate at which monetary policy neither boosts nor restrains the economy) would rise, so the central bank would be right to move interest rates towards that level.

If you are interested in getting life insurance to cover your mortgage, whether mortgage life insurance is the right policy for you depends primarily on your health.

If the fundamental problem is that America has far too many guns, then policies need to cut the number of guns in circulation right now to seriously reduce the number of gun deaths.

If Exmo identifies unauthentic and illegitimate uses of its policies, features, and functionalities; it reserves the right to take serious legal actions.

If you are worthy enough to make it on to the aristocrats list then you must be doing something right in terms of a dividend distribution policy.

«If the New Democrats are serious about their policy book, I don't think they're going to hand them over to Avi Lewis and Naomi Klein, just»cause,» says former party official Ian Capstick, who identifies himself with what exists of a right flank of the NDP.

That may not mean the U.S. crashes and burns, according to the experts at Russell, but «virtually nonexistent» inflation in Europe coupled with expansionary monetary policy and more reasonable valuations should entice investors to move across the Atlantic right now if they want a profitable 2018.

If predominately Islamic societies can not do democracy, that has to mean a U.S. policy that prefers dictators and kings for such societies, right?

Progressive legal theorists exploited this doctrinal disjunction to argue that the justices» opposition to economic reforms was fundamentally ideological and thus illegitimate: «If the public's evolving attitude towards liquor and lotteries had been sufficient to justify a rethinking of economic rights and federalism constraints, the argument went, then what else but the subjective policy preferences of the justices themselves could explain the Court's stubborn resistance to other, broadly popular forms of «social» legislation?»

Also, morality is not external (if byexternal that you mean something that you can know is right or wrong has to be determined by a larger body or set of policies created by someone else many years ago to be official), and morality does not necessarily flow from religion (plenty of Catholic priests, Islamic Imams, Protestant preachers wave their hands high in the air in the afternoon, at praise time, and when the lights go down they crawl on their bellies, and hands and knees like snakes and dogs).

If you walked into a gay bar, and you were criticized for being straight, or denied service, then yes, you would have every right to attack their policies and beliefs.

The outstanding example, of course, is the Chinese government's long - running «one - child policy,» replete with forced abortions, public trackings of menstrual cycles, family flight, increased female infanticide, sterilization, and other assaults too numerous even to begin cataloguing here — in fact, so numerous that they are now widely, if often grudgingly, acknowledged as wrongs even by international human - rights bureaucracies.

The «right to die» and «death with dignity» proposals, while appealing to excruciatingly painful individual cases, would have, if they carry the day, what May calls a «cumulative impact» upon social policy and attitudes.

If those guys are largely right about the incentive factors that would then come into play (and especially if Americans were moderating their economic libertarianism with devotion to family, virtue, community, and God, as your work would urge them to), then by no means would that cause the social welfare policy disaster most liberals assume it woulIf those guys are largely right about the incentive factors that would then come into play (and especially if Americans were moderating their economic libertarianism with devotion to family, virtue, community, and God, as your work would urge them to), then by no means would that cause the social welfare policy disaster most liberals assume it woulif Americans were moderating their economic libertarianism with devotion to family, virtue, community, and God, as your work would urge them to), then by no means would that cause the social welfare policy disaster most liberals assume it would.

Right, if the owner of a company is a member of a religion that doesn't believe in using medicine at all do they have the right then to provide only an insurance policy that covers prRight, if the owner of a company is a member of a religion that doesn't believe in using medicine at all do they have the right then to provide only an insurance policy that covers prright then to provide only an insurance policy that covers prayer?

If the purpose of the legislation of the Sunnah is to expound the legislation of the Qur» an, and if God's policy with His Prophet was to endorse Muhammad's interpretation when it was correct and to guide him to what was right when he made a mistake, then the Sunnah legislation is the same as the legislation of the Qur» an, and equally binding on all MuslimIf the purpose of the legislation of the Sunnah is to expound the legislation of the Qur» an, and if God's policy with His Prophet was to endorse Muhammad's interpretation when it was correct and to guide him to what was right when he made a mistake, then the Sunnah legislation is the same as the legislation of the Qur» an, and equally binding on all Muslimif God's policy with His Prophet was to endorse Muhammad's interpretation when it was correct and to guide him to what was right when he made a mistake, then the Sunnah legislation is the same as the legislation of the Qur» an, and equally binding on all Muslims.

The federal government has the right to mandate policy on any religion if it is practicing a policy that harms society and creates at - risk children who eventually become drug - addicted, criminals.

due to some crazy religious beliefs out there in the world i.e. marrying off young children and marrying genetic kin, the government can't ever allow religion to dictate marriage policy, so have your ceremonies and deny same - gender couples to marry in your church but bluntly stated your crying and foot - stomping will accomplish nothing, marriage isn't a religious thing it is a civil rights and equality thing, thus if the religious win by denying same gender cuples their civil rights to equal treatment under the law, then don't be surprised when others use those same grounds to deny you your rights under the law.

Even if the rights were there to do so, it would be stupid policy: intense religious groups prosper when persecution makes them alluring.

But such would have to be Arkes» outlook: if indeed there are fundamental principles of natural law and natural right, discernible to the human mind generally (as Arkes thinks), then policies or practices that effectively deny these can only be supported for the short term, or in the long term only by continuing fraud and force.

But, if they try and effect social policy, such as denying gays their rights based on their primitive superst.ition, then they, likewise, must be reigned in.

«One of Ukip's policies is that if enough people want to change the law, on a particular moral issue, whether that's a left wing issue, whether that's a right wing issue, that they should be able to if they get enough signatures on a petition.»

Our commitment to human rights, if it is to be sustained, must depend not on practice, law, or the passing policies of governments (though we must be earnestly concerned about all of these), but rather on a promise that bestows dignity upon every person and demands of every person a respect — no, a reverence — for the dignity of all others.

If the «what» of human rights is to be grounded in American public policy, the «why» must be grounded in the religious beliefs of the American people.

If a good policy, such as the advancement of human rights, is inconsistently applied or even betrayed, that fact does not make the policy less good.

If someone wants to practice some crazy belief in the privacy of their own home or in a church with like minded nutjobs thats their right — but do nt force you prayer on me, make policy based on those nutjob beliefs and please keep your blessings to yourself — I do not want them.

He has a right to speak if a policy debate becomes too removed from reality.

If morality as proclaimed by various religions is denied a place at the policy table, then our nation will only be guided by those with a very cramped and limited moral view — which would have been a disaster for abolition and civil rights way back then — and would be no less a disaster today.

It's available in English and Spanish and can help the students learn more about their rights, how to fight for changes in school policy and where they can get help if the policies are indeed targeting.

But if the first side wins out, as it is doing, the hope that social policy will assist in creating more harmonious social relations, better - working social institutions broadly accepted as the decent and right way to order society, can not be realized.

That means that doctrinal provisions of religious schools «may not be enough to fend off IRS challenges to tax - exempt status if the IRS or the courts conclude that the right of same - sex couples to marry is a fundamental and compelling public policy,» he wrote.

We surprise ourselves when we entertain brutality as a policy option in the world, and vengeance now seems acceptable if aimed at the right people.