Not exact matches
A
student who transfers from the Florida Virtual
School full - time program to a traditional public school before or during the first grading period of the school year is academically eligible to participate in interscholastic extracurricular activities during the first grading period if the student has a successful evaluation from the previous school year pursuant to paragrap
School full - time program to a
traditional public school before or during the first grading period of the school year is academically eligible to participate in interscholastic extracurricular activities during the first grading period if the student has a successful evaluation from the previous school year pursuant to paragrap
school before or during the first grading period of the
school year is academically eligible to participate in interscholastic extracurricular activities during the first grading period if the student has a successful evaluation from the previous school year pursuant to paragrap
school year is academically eligible to participate in interscholastic extracurricular activities during the first grading period
if the
student has a successful evaluation from the previous
school year pursuant to paragrap
school year pursuant to paragraph (a).
A
student who transfers from a charter
school program to a
traditional public school before or during the first grading period of the
school year is academically eligible to participate in interscholastic extracurricular activities during the first grading period
if the
student has a successful evaluation from the previous
school year, pursuant to subparagraph 2.
Normally,
if we say that a
traditional public school is «more black» or «more Hispanic,» we mean to imply that the
school has fewer white
students.
However, simple tests we conducted, based on changes in the average previous - year test scores of
students in
schools affected and unaffected by charter -
school competition, suggest that,
if anything, the opposite phenomenon occurred:
students switching from
traditional public to charter
schools appear to have been above - average performers compared with the other
students in their
school.
But this article on private tuition for special education «burdens» is even worse because the burden on the district isn't the total cost, but the cost for private placement in excess of what the district would have spent
if they had served these disabled
students in
traditional public schools.
Here is what we know:
students in urban areas do significantly better in
school if they attend a charter
schools than
if they attend a
traditional public school.
Charter
schools have the potential to have broader effects on
student achievement
if traditional public schools respond to the threat of losing
students to charter
schools by improving the quality of their own education programs.
If charter
schools were primarily established in response to dissatisfaction with
traditional public schools, they would tend to be located in areas with low - quality
traditional public schools where
students would tend to make below - average test - score gains.
Still,
if North Carolina's
traditional public schools improved in response to their presence, the apparently negative effects of charter
schools on the achievement of
students who attend them could be offset by more positive statewide effects.
Only 18 percent of the
public know that charters can not hold religious services, 19 percent that they can not charge tuition, 15 percent that
students must be admitted by lottery (
if the
school is oversubscribed), and just 12 percent that, typically, charters receive less government funding per pupil than
traditional public schools.
And equity would be further enhanced
if we targeted choice programs toward low income
students in low performing
traditional public schools.
Even
if a charter or private
school were no better than a
traditional forced - choice
public school, the fact that parents and
students themselves choose the
school may mean they perceive distinct advantages in it, real or not.
As he speculates in «Injecting Charter
School Best Practices Into
Traditional Public Schools: Evidence from Field Experiments,»» [A] leading theory posits that reading scores are influenced by the language spoken when
students are outside of the classroom... [The researchers] argue that
if students speak non-standard English at home and in their communities, increasing reading scores might be especially difficult.
If the
student attends a
traditional public school, the state spends $ 6,225 in operational expenses alone this year.
If anything,
public charter
schools tend to increase the academic performance of
students in
traditional public, likely due to increased competition.
«
If they were paired with a
traditional public schools student, the
public school student kept their place in line, and the cyberstudent moved back five spots,» she said.
The supporters of the charter
school moratorium made two arguments: the charter
schools are not as good as people say they are, and
if the charters
schools expanded they would hurt the education of
students in the
traditional public schools.
Such charges would be more appropriate
if they were leveled at
traditional public schools where
students in residential boundaries are forced to attend segregated
schools.
For example, in the case of Washington D.C.,
if the entire CBSA were an appropriate point of comparison, charter
students would be crossing state lines (since the Washington D.C. CBSA also includes Virginia, Maryland, and West Virginia) and city boundaries in the 5,000 square mile region in an effort to travel to charter
schools in the heart of inner city D.C. Of course, it doesn't make sense to compare, for instance, the charter
schools in Washington D.C. (where 93 % of the charter
schools in the metro region are located) to the
traditional public schools in Front Royal, VA, which is 63 miles away!
If policymakers aim to improve the educational opportunities available to the poorest
students, they will have to develop strategies to turn around the
schools — charter
schools and
traditional public schools — that these
students attend.
Federal appropriations for programs that charters may not provide and gifts and grants specifically targeted toward
traditional public schools that support innovative methods to boost
student achievement could all be up for grabs by charter
schools,
if House lawmakers concur with the Senate's changes to H539.
As educators try to improve performance of
students at
traditional public schools, charter
schools are springing up as a popular,
if patchy, fix.
Require that
public charter
schools be free and open to all
students just as
traditional public schools are, and that
students be selected by lottery to ensure fairness
if more
students apply than a
school can accommodate;
It would be as
if those who always thought the district was too large to be manageable suddenly got their wish, leaving half the
students in
traditional public schools and the other half to wherever their parents could find new slots to enroll them.
Charter
schools are unique
public schools granted some flexibility by the state to be responsive to
students» needs and innovative in education, while meeting stricter accountability than
traditional ISDs, because charter
schools can be closed
if there are academic and financial problems for three years running.
Charters
schools receiving a D or F can also qualify for this money
if they prove their
students perform as well or better than nearby
traditional public schools.
Since the average charter
school enrolls 400
students, the average
public charter
school in the U.S. received $ 1,525,600 less in per - pupil funding in 2010 - 11 than it would have received
if it had been a
traditional public school.
First, he mused that authorizers must provide unlimited access to those
students whose educational options are limited to the nearest
traditional public school, a
school that may not be meeting the needs of
students in that neighborhood, especially
if they are low income, racially diverse learners.
The studies come amid a growing debate over the question of whether charter
schools are inadequately funded compared with
traditional public schools, and
if / how they improve
student achievement better than the
traditional schools.
If NYC is to meet the Mayor's worthy goal of «ensuring no child in the City goes to a
school that does not provide a high - quality education,» then it must develop a new strategy for turning around
traditional public schools, which will always serve the majority of city
students.
If a
student leaves a
traditional public school and enrolls in a charter
school, state and federal tax dollars would follow that
student to the new
school, with some exceptions.
«The charter
school movement has expanded over the last 20 years largely on this promise:
If exempted from some state regulations, charters could outperform
traditional public schools because they have flexibility and can be more readily tailored to the needs of
students.
When weighing finances with philosophies,
if students aren't failing in the
traditional schools, most parents believe the
public schools are good enough and offer their children socializing experiences that they can't get in
schools that are too small.
That said, the highest - quality research studies find that charter
schools tend to produce greater gains in math and reading test scores for traditionally disadvantaged
students, compared to the gains these same
students would achieve
if they attended a
traditional public school.
If a charter has a lower percentage of ELL
students to teach than a
traditional public school, its average reported test scores may be easier to raise.
23) North Carolina: Durham
Public Schools Superintendent Pascal Mubenga warns that if charter schools continue to siphon off students from traditional public schools, the school system will resegregate i
Public Schools Superintendent Pascal Mubenga warns that if charter schools continue to siphon off students from traditional public schools, the school system will resegregate
Schools Superintendent Pascal Mubenga warns that
if charter
schools continue to siphon off students from traditional public schools, the school system will resegregate
schools continue to siphon off
students from
traditional public schools, the school system will resegregate i
public schools, the school system will resegregate
schools, the
school system will resegregate itself.
Second, beyond selection bias, we don't know
if there are other factors that affect achievement that we are not accounting for that are systematically different between
students in choice
schools and
students in
traditional public schools.
Charter
school officials say they should get just as much funding because their
schools perform just as well,
if not better, than
traditional public schools while educating higher percentages of low - income, minority
students.
Although some individual charter
schools have their struggles, the study suggests that
students who attend charters generally may be better off than
if they had gone to
traditional public schools in their communities.
If there are more applications for admission to a particular
school, a lottery is used to determine which
students are enrolled and charter
schools are subject to the same system of state accountability as
traditional public schools.
When
traditional public schools have to lay off teachers because of enrollment shifts or changing
student needs, they are required (in New Jersey and nine other states) to lay off tenured teachers with the least seniority, even
if that teacher won a Teacher of the Year award.