New research done at Ohio State University and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences indicates that
if wealthy nations spent collectively $ 1 billion annually to pay landowners in tropical countries not to cut down forests half a billion tonnes of carbon emissions could be avoided annually and deforestation reduced by one - tenth.
New research done at Ohio State University and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences indicates that
if wealthy nations spent collectively $ 1 billion annually to pay landowners in tropical countries not to
On their current course, rapidly developing nations could consume all of the carbon budget by 2030 — even
if wealthy nations were to entirely eliminate their emissions over the same period.
But now, mindful of the environmental and political cost, the state has made a startling proposal:
if wealthy nations pay Ecuador $ 350m (# 174m) a year — half of the estimated revenue — it will leave the oil in the ground.
What a huge step toward world peace
if all wealthy nations agreed to do the same!
On their current course, rapidly developing nations could consume all of the carbon budget by 2030 — even
if wealthy nations were to entirely eliminate their emissions over the same period.
And I profoundly believe that many of the conflicts, the refugee crises, the military interventions over the years might have been avoided if nations had truly invested in the lives of their people, and
if the wealthiest nations on Earth were better partners in working with those that are trying to lift themselves up.
If a wealthy nation with high per capita emissions refused to adopt emission reduction targets, it would be impossible to persuade developing countries to adopt targets in subsequent commitment periods.
Not exact matches
But even
if they agreed that in already industrialized countries with adequate productive capacity a shift toward regional self - sufficiency would be possible, they would be likely to argue that this withdrawal from the global market on the part of the
wealthy nations would be unconscionable.
And she is much more likely to either have knowledgeable breastfeeding support in her social circles or,
if the breastfeeding specialist - to - mother ratio is similar to that of a
wealthy nation, those breastfeeding supports are not having to compete with rampant cultural influence from formula companies and other cultural breastfeeding hurdles, such as unpaid maternity leave.
«
If you work a full time job in the
wealthiest nation on earth, you shouldn't have to have to struggle to feed your family,» stated Pérez at the rally.
I'm afraid I'll sound condescending here, but
if you don't at least follow the news, you probably are going to find Syriana to be a tedious watch, and that's a shame in itself, as ignorance to world events is what greases the wheels of the grand machine that keeps corporations fat and happy, politicians in their pockets, foreign regimes in a constant state of perpetual flux, and the standard of living for millions of people near destitute in what should be the among the
wealthiest nations on the face of the Earth.
Driving school reform with traditional tests will not succeed
if the
nation really wants all children, not just the children of the
wealthy, to gain an education that challenges
If we can just take a moment from our business meetings, money making, material accumulation, and exotic holidays to notice, we will realise that if the developed nations do not start providing financial assistance, technology transfers, infrastructure, education and debt relief to developing nations, the «wealthy» lifestyle enjoyed by Betty et al will soon perish as wel
If we can just take a moment from our business meetings, money making, material accumulation, and exotic holidays to notice, we will realise that
if the developed nations do not start providing financial assistance, technology transfers, infrastructure, education and debt relief to developing nations, the «wealthy» lifestyle enjoyed by Betty et al will soon perish as wel
if the developed
nations do not start providing financial assistance, technology transfers, infrastructure, education and debt relief to developing
nations, the «
wealthy» lifestyle enjoyed by Betty et al will soon perish as well.
Many experts say the world's
wealthy nations will probably have to compensate China and India
if those countries are to move to curtail emissions.
To mark the occasion, Olav Kjorven, assistant secretary general of the United
Nations for development policy, submitted a comment on my recent post asking
if the world's
wealthiest people need new goals even as rich countries work to foster human and environmental progress elsewhere.
Edward Lendner, who was director of climate issues in a previous White House administration, wrote last week: «In what would be the single most important contingency that could impact civil society in the United States and other
nations around the world, there is no agreed upon plan for how to deal with a collapsing world in the distant future
if climate change and global warming get out of control and mass migrations northward create chaos in both
wealthy and poor countries.»
I guess it serves a purpose
if developing countries can convince more
wealthy nations to transfer billions of dollars for hazard mitigation whatever the cause.
And,
if such a graduated fee scale were introduced, should it be so structured that extremely poor regions (and individuals) pay a «negative: fee, i.e. receive a breathing rebate, which is paid by the
wealthier nations (and individuals)?
If one believes that decoupling is occurring too slowly, one may be inclined to also advocate for slowing economic growth in
wealthy nations, as Hickel suggests.
Developing countries of the Global South have promised to do even more
if they are financed by
wealthy nations.
We can't possibly bring the whole world out of poverty
if it means living and wasting and polluting as we
wealthy nations do.
The report says that the world is ill - prepared to manage the risks from a changing climate, and that
if warming proceeds along the high end of the possible range of outcomes, climate change may overwhelm even the most well - prepared and
wealthy nations.
Although climate change threatens the world's small island
nations, many can find ways to adapt and preserve their homes and cultures — especially
if wealthy countries cut emissions and provide support.
So
if Trump strongly curbs immigration, the U.S. will encounter problems similar to those of Japan, Germany and other
wealthy slow - growth
nations.