Sentences with phrase «if your baby died»

However, I will say that if this baby died because she neglected to get appropriate care due to her own stubbornness and selfishness then, yes, that should be investigated.

If your baby died as an infant, you would have to call the para-medics or police.

«I have had several patients throughout my career tell me that they do not care if the baby dies; they just want the best birth experience.»

Let's not sugar coat reality too much by saying if a baby dies in hospital it's never the OB or nurse or surgeon's fault.

I wanted to respond to the comments about «not caring if my baby dies.»

However, as noted below, if the baby dies, nothing else matters.

What if your baby dies tomorrow?

Dwelling on your intact perineum is cold comfort if your baby dies of a preventable cause.

If the baby dies, suddenly risk becomes important.

If a baby dies intervention was obviously necessary.

IF A BABY DIES IN HOSPITAL IT IS NOT YOUR FAULT.

If her baby died of cardiac arrest it could have done so in the hospital too.

They feel if they don't bond with the baby they can protect themselves from some of the pain if this baby dies as well.

If these babies died after birth due to injuries they suffered during labor, there is some gross negligence in assessing the well - being of the client under their care.

If your baby died from SIDS then it makes no difference that he was in bed with you.

It is a shame and certainly inappropriate that, for example, the head pathologists of the state of Indiana recommends that other pathologists assume SIDS as a likely cause of death when babies die in cribs but to assume asphyxiation if a baby dies in an adult bed or has a history of «cosleeping».

Just make sure, as much as this is possible, that you would not assume that if the baby died, that either you or your spouse would think that bed - sharing contributed to the death, or that one of your really suffocated (by accident) the infant.

Your wife may be disappointed that you do not approve of homebirth, but that is nothing compared to the lifelong heartache both she and you will endure if your baby dies at home because the emergency treatment he or she needed was too far away to make a difference.

If a baby dies at a birth you're attending it was «100 %» the «responsibility».

However, even James McKenna recommends that if you doubt the safety of bedsharing and would feel guilty if your baby died of SIDS next to you in bed, then it probably isn't a good option for you.

Moms that take their babies to bed with them are taking a huge risk and can they live with the guilt if their baby dies in their bed?

Indeed, if a baby dies in what is defined as an «unsafe sleep environment,» such as all non-crib sleeping deaths, those babies are no longer regarded as SIDS deaths, when in fact, they could be.9 More problematic is the fact that the SUID diagnosis is being applied abundantly in cases where an infant is found dead sleeping next to a parent on the same surface, no matter what the social or physical circumstances.26

If your baby dies or is born with a birth injury because of medical malpractice, you may be entitled to damages.

Not exact matches

9 months from conception, if an abortion doesn't occur (and assuming the baby doesn't die of natural causes), you're holding a living, breathing being in your arms.

If the baby did die in that process, then we'd mourn for it.

My brother said they said the mother should die before the fetus and if we do abort the baby we are «playing God.»

If that course proves impossible, they just want to take their baby home so he can die there instead of in a pediatric ICU.

The «christian view» goes something like this, «there is a benevolent sky daddy who made some arbitrary rules that include condoning slavery and stoning unruly children to death, and if I don't follow these rules, I burn in hell for all eternity... unless I ask for forgiveness at some point before I die, then all is forgiven and I live in heaven for all eternity, even if I'm a baby rapist!».

If Camus could make sense of a God who permitted babies to die, he could find the Christian scheme attractive.

Urofsky gives us the current state of the law in regard to «the right to die,» suicide and assisted suicide, mercy killings, the right of condemned criminals to be executed if that is what they want, letting deformed babies die by refusal of care, and «living wills.»

But Sarah, you also believe that if you are a «true» Mormon when you die then you will get to marry a spiritual husband who will get his own planet and the two of you can populate it with space babies.

If what you interpret Paul as saying is that before creating all the myriad galaxies and star systems God decided that They would put some humans on the third planet from an insignificant star on a little arm of a middling galaxy and that the first hominids chosen role would be to perform pretty much to spec and do something silly and rebellious (arguably without sufficient information as to consequences for themselves and their off spring, oh, and for serpents) and cause affront to the tripartite godhead warranting separation of Gods grace from all their offspring; then we are left with people being chosen from way back before the Big Bang to do some terrible things like killing babies or betraying Jesus who was chosen on the same non date (time didn't exist before creation) to die in a fairly nasty fashion and thereby appease the righteous wrath of himself and his fellow Trinitarians by paying a penalty as a substitute for all future sins (of believers?)

Other Christians, even if they are hesitant to affirm a physical resurrection, will surely balk, if they take the New Testament seriously, at following Kübler - Ross's chatty recommendation that «it might be helpful if more people would talk about death and dying as an intrinsic part of life, just as they do not hesitate to mention when someone is expecting a new baby.»

In other words, if the baby (H3206) flows out of her (H3318) yet no mischief follows (the baby does not die)....

If Jesus came only to die and take away our sins, why didn't God just get it over with when Herod massacred all the babies under the age of two?

awanderingscot, what if very early in the process they realize that teh baby will be born with a terrible genetic disease that will ensure it dies as a child and only after a short life of horrible suffereing.

Doc Vestibule Right, back in the «good old days» sure they would have waited for the baby to be born, and then they would leave it exposed somewhere in the wilderness to die, especially if it's paternity was undesirable, or if it was deformed in some way.

If a baby is alive at birth and dies soon after, it is considered a matter for the coroner.»

Putting many MANY studies together has been done, and going in for a repeat c - section with my fourth baby knowing that I had a more than 3-fold increased risk of dying on the table than if I was attempting a vaginal birth after 3 previous c - sections was hard to deal with.

I think it is ironic and sad that her baby died in her attempt at «Freebirthing» Maybe this tragic event will cause some to reconsider and think a little more about the consequences to their selfish actions and reevaluate if they are willing to sacrifice their childrens lives for their «Experience»

If the hospital had monitored the baby properly (they did not), the baby would not have died.

The only thing that could possibly have been different, is if 1) it were detected sooner and she had a very late abortion, or 2) She transferred to the hospital and they did a c / s in which case the only difference would be that she would have been in labor a shorter time, baby still would have died.

It's as if my brain hasn't figured out that a baby died and another was born.

Some studies showed that babies from HIV - positive mothers who were put on formula had a higher chance of dying before their second birthday, even if they had a lower chance of contracting HIV.

If a mother is not receiving prenatal care, she has a much greater risk of her baby dying than if she is being managed by a physiciaIf a mother is not receiving prenatal care, she has a much greater risk of her baby dying than if she is being managed by a physiciaif she is being managed by a physician.

We are so sorry if you have had a baby die, if you have loved ones whose child died, or a patient or client who has had such a loss.

My point is that if you are going to rely on a historical based fear of women and babies dieing in childbirth (which they did and still do) then it is important to look at the correlations and significant factors so you can consciously choose if you want to continue acting from that fear based model.

If there are 10 homebirths and 2 babies die, and there are 1000 hospital births and 20 babies die, more babies died in a hospital.

If you read the whole comment you may understand that when I say to blame ONE person for ALL the deaths is like blaming the good doctor, herself, for ALL the babies who have died during childbirth when accepted» practices; like drug or surgical intervention were orchestrated in hospitals by Obstetricians!

Every labor and delivery carries the risk of the baby dying, especially if the mother is attended by an incompetent practitioner without adequate backup in case something goes wrong.