Not exact matches
One aspect of God - talk, for example, which is overdue for elimination is that which tries to look for evidence of God in the areas of human
ignorance, and which seeks to use him
as the
explanation of all we do not understand.
As I hate to assume malice when
ignorance is enough of an
explanation, I give you a chance: just point me to any logical error in any of the major religions.
It can also be criticized theologically
as a continuation of the «God of the gaps,» attempting to invoke God
as explanation for an area of
ignorance.
Neil deGrasse Tyson, astrophysicist, explains how God disappeared
as an
explanation for things humans did not understand about the universe,
as the «perimeter of
ignorance» receded.
Somehow, I don't think Trump's pollsters have any more knowledge on how to do proper polling, so that eliminates incompetence on the news media part and only leaves intentional misleading or willful
ignorance as the only other plausible
explanations.
People don't reject it out of greed or
ignorance, and libertarians who put these forward
as explanations are kidding themselves.
There is no reasonalbe
explanation for why anyone would deny Earth's climate is the result of the holistic process we call nature and certainly no non-political
explanation other than superstition or
ignorance why and federal climatist would believe that a monophysical element like CO2 with properties
as we observe on Earth could ever possible explain global warming — especially when we know that the Sun is the only independent variable that nominally explains both global warming and cooling.
Nate, regarding the «chills» that run down your spine when you read «True freedom is not the freedom to do
as one pleases, but rather empowerment to do what is best» perhaps some
explanation is in order, since there seems to be a good deal of
ignorance and misinformation out there regarding what Christians (or Evangelican Christians in any event) actually believe.