Sentences with phrase «ignorant men do»

Not exact matches

They just do not give magic men believers any special treatment for their ignorant views.

«By further reflecting that the clearest evidence would be requisite to make any sane man believe in the miracles by which Christianity is supported, — that the more we know of the fixed laws of nature the more incredible, do miracles become, — that the men at that time were ignorant and credulous to a degree almost incomprehensible by us, — that the Gospels can not be proved to have been written simultaneously with the events, — that they differ in many important details, far too important as it seemed to me to be admitted as the usual inaccuracies of eyewitness; — by such reflections as these, which I give not as having the least novelty or value, but as they influenced me, I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelation.

You really don't realize do you, Debra, that quotations from this book put together by ignorant men a couple of thousand years ago is really not convincing at all.

Obviously, that biblical law was written by ignorant men, and because humans are changeable, we have «evolved» our beliefs on such things and do not recognize what the biblical laws require — because they are immoral.

Even if we accept the highly questionable proposition that the Big Bang had to have some intelligent designer behind it, how do we get from there to the Bible, a book written by ignorant men on one planet 13,400,000,000 years after the event?

You ignorant person, don't you know the bible and other religious works are written by men from a long time ago who hated women except to procreate with them and have them serve them as their slaves?

Even if you choose not to do anything to help your fellow man, it is shameful to be deliberately this ignorant.

And they do not know any creed and are not idolators; only they all believe that power and good are in the heavens... not... because they are ignorant; on the contrary, they are of a very acute intelligence and are men who navigate all these seas.7

A house does not create itself you can suggest life came from nothing but yet you see evolution not creating houses come now your wisdom in the wisdom of men is what makes you ignorant.

1 Thessalonians 4:13 - 18 — Brothers, we do not want you to be ignorant about those who fall asleep, or to grieve like the rest of men, who have no hope.

Romesh Dutt, translator of the Epics in Everyman's Library says of them: «The Hindu scarcely lives, man or woman, high or low, educated or ignorant, whose earliest recollections do not cling to the story and the character of the great Epics.

«god» was so responsible in making that «provision» for being «saved» that «he» waited tens of thousands of years after modern man arrived on this planet (dooming countless generations to «hell» because they didn't have a chance), and then on top of that «he» implemented «his» «provision» in the middle of a freakin» desert in a time when there was no Internet and at a time when those ignorant goatherding people thought the world was flat (thereby dooming countless more generations of people to «hell» because there was no way, for example, to even get the message to what would become the Americas 15 centuries later).

Also jesus said a son of man will come, A man he would send that will do miracles like him, and even better and more and he will tell us even more truth, truth jesus couldn't tell in the past because they where to much ignorant to understand and he said hat himself.

All that, and your Dad was a mortal, weak, ignorant man (as I am with my kids), and it still appears he did a much better job that an all - powerful, all - knowing, all - loving invisible spirit.

But «I was so Ignorant that I did not think any Man in the World had had such thoughts before.

Yes, Jesus a Liberal... and Ken you are a frightened human being... let it go... I'm not pushing anything on anyone... Christ loves everyone... man was made in God's image so deal with it... and me2 you and I both know it was the conservatives who wanted slavery... Abe Lincoln would be sickened by what has happened to his party... he was a man who stood on principle and believed in good for the common man... way different than the party you are tied to... Price... I agree with you in that there are many good Christians... unfortunately, there are many who are very ignorant and use Christ / God as a convenient excuse to denounce what they don't accept...

When he learned that they could not answer his questions, he realized that the so - called wise men did not know that they were ignorant.

another: «It's a shame that people don't realize that religion is made up by old dusty men looking to take advantage of the ignorant and naive.»

I m pretty sure the board are too scared and ignorant about footbal to sack him but come on if things don t work out, a man has to stand up and correct it.It s obvious he is not up to the task to make Arsanal a real force so he should aknowledge that and say «my time is up, let someone else takes over and try to do better».

i can, t believe that this post had been allowed to be posted on this site!anyone connected with arsenal does know that despite his flaws and he has a few WENGER does what he thinks is best for the club, fans and aslo thinks he is still the right man to lead us something im sure many will disagree with but to go as far as calling him an old man, deluded, a sorry excuse of a manager, calling for him to be booted out of the club and not be allowed near it again is out of order, and also shows how clueless & ignorant you are!!

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

If a man can be this arrogant and ignorant of the situation and would rather stay for his selfishness rather leave for the clubs own good and to save some face, then in this situation only the board or owner can do what every respecting fan would rather not wish, which is to sack the manager.

Is it because you are incapable of getting wealthy yourself because you do n`t have the brains or ability, or is it just that you are a jealous bigoted little man that is like most socialists... ignorant and stupid?

A man who is done wasting life on ignorant and disrespectful young women who are honestly not worthy and ready to have a perfect fit for the sugar baby you are looking for.

Don't put all your eggs into one basket when dating online because 98 % of the dates you go on and / or men you speak to, will either disappear, not follow through, end up not being a match, become ignorant and / or lazy or end up being men you're not interested in anyway.

this show is the greatespiece of entertainment known to man, action, violence, great story based on real life, this show made me feel like everything i have watched in my entire life was a waste of my time, if u don't like this show you are prob brainwashed by religion or someother ignorant group that don't like things uncensored, everything about this is high quality, the highest quality, homophobes, or violence phobes or just people who are boring won't like this, 10 out of 10

this show is the greatespiece of entertainment known to man, action, violence, great story based on real life, this show made me feel like everything i have watched in my entire life was a waste of my time, if u don't like this show you are prob brainwashed by religion or someother ignorant group that don't like things uncensored, everything about this is high quality, the highest quality,

Simien's film takes place at Winchester University, a predominantly white, prestigious university where we're introduced to six significant characters: Sam White (Tessa Thompson), the biracial activist who overcompensates her blackness; Lionel Higgins (Tyler James Williams), the black homosexual who lives in an all - white residence building, and feels little sense of belonging; Colandrea «CoCo» Conners (Teyonah Parris), the white - washed blogger who acknowledges racism yet chooses to ignore it in fear of non-acceptance from the white majority; The Dean (Dennis Haysbert), who has worked hard his whole life solely to over-emphasize his superiority and intelligence towards white corporate men, specifically the president of Winchester; The Dean's son Troy (Brandon Bell), who spends his college career doing things to make his father happy and impress the white majority; and Kurt Fletcher (Kyle Gallner), the privileged, ignorant son of the President of Winchester.

The film's men are largely irrelevant — ignorant of Tully's issues and doing little to alleviate her problems — which leaves room for Davis to take the rest.

Those who did not make good board members were: «Inexperienced young men, unsuccessful men, old men who have retired from business, politicians, saloon - keepers, uneducated or relatively ignorant men, men in minor business positions, and women...»»

His cell, he shares with five other men, nasty criminals all unlike Alex, one will have to sleep on the floor, his fists will not let him be the one... Doctors Branom and Brodsky, ignorant fellows, they don't understand his slang, have a new technique to cure his violent behavior, as some people call it, two weeks and a free man, let the torture begin... A magnificent fable of what might be...

Most people are ignorant of astronomy or advanced physics, but if you asked them if black holes exist, you'd get a higher proportion agreeing than do with man - made global warming.

If Andy and John Holdren did as much to raise consciousness about biogeochemical cycles other than carbon and CO2, it would deny the advertising men on both sides of this dueling tuba contest their lawful prey - an innumerate audience ignorant of natural history and science alike.

I don't know if the man knows he's full of crap, or if he is just so ignorant and myopic that he really believes what he's saying.

I am beginning to get the impression that Mr. Shore, and too many others like him, are deliberately venting their untutored and ignorant malevolence here, over and over again, with less and less scientific credibility, not so much because they want to silence the likes of Professor Lindzen (they know that all their venom can not do that to so brave a man who has endured their snarling viciousness so imperturbably for so long) but because they and their political allies on the climate - extremist hard Left want to frighten off anyone else who dares to question the IPCC / RealClimate storyline so that they are deterred from saying anything publicly for fear of being mistreated and abused and hollered at and smeared in a similar fashion.

Whether the climate is changing or not isn't really the important question — it's whether there is anything the population can to do to manipulate climate change — given the extraordary complexities of influences on climate, some man - made, many not, the latter is highly unlikely — only the very arrogant and very ignorant would conclude differently.

This we will do if we say we have the answers now, so young and ignorant; if we suppress all discussions, all criticism, saying, «This is it, boys, man is saved!»

First, we went to a Christian Marriage Therapist, one who respects women and does not espouse the old ignorant belief that God put us women here for no other reason than to bow down to men, bear their children, submit to his abuse, serve and service him, and call it JUST because Eve enticed Adam with a bite of fruit 6,000 or so years ago.