So now there are an entire ecosystem of philanthropic organisations, funding other organisations to «inform» an
apparently ignorant public for their own good.
I'm wondering whether there is some way to illustrate the fact that it's a coterie of fossil - fuel - funded propaganda outlets who are driving the «debate,» rather than a
stubbornly ignorant public.
Tell this to
the ignorant PUblic Servants with all their lawmakin» based on race.
You are the ones force feeding misinformation to
an ignorant public.
Mainstream elites, centre - left and centre - right today presume that government is a kind of enlightened administration on behalf of
an ignorant public.
For
the ignorant public who have no real understanding on how the scams operate it's very easy to get caught with your pants down and ripped off.
Inundating
an ignorant public with pages and pages of legaleeze is NOT informing them.
Regrettably, they must also endure the ravages of urban sprawl and the derision of an ungrateful and
ignorant public.»
Schattschneider in his essay gives no comfort to those who would argue that
an ignorant public is irrelevant to the outcome of a democratic society.
And they need to invent a feckless,
ignorant public, who are held in thrall to the «denier» bogeyman shouting into «the echo chamber».