Authors and publishers who
ignore changes in the media do so at their own peril.
Not exact matches
«Emergence of participatory
media may
change the power
media have to frame social movements, as social movement actors can forcefully offer their framing, diffuse their preferred framing to large audiences
in ways that would have been simply impossible or prohibitively costly before social
media, challenge journalists directly, or create a strong enough attention around their own framing that it becomes harder to
ignore.»
Although usually
ignored or reflected only negatively by the
media, the faade of this neighborhood has been altered and consciously personalized
in ad hoc ways to reflect it's dynamic past and ever -
changing present.
This paper incorporating articles by three leading Australian experts has been virtually
ignored by the Australian Government and the
media, including
in the voluminous reading lists on climate
change issues published on the websites of the Australian Greenhouse Office, CSIRO and the ABC.
And
in addition, think about all the wasted energy the «climate community» spent mitigating the impact of «deniers,» when «skeptics» could have helped out by listening more carefully to the «climate community,» and trying to understand «the climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and
change — rather than apologizing or
ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation
in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «
media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community»
ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capitalism.
I want to challenge the news
media to reverse course and report on the objective science of climate
change, stop
ignoring legitimate voices
in this scientific debate, and stop being used by the hysterical left,» said Inhofe.
And so, although climate
change is a civilization challenging problem of distributive justice, the US
media has largely
ignored the justice issues particularly
in regard to their significance for US policy.
As we have frequently reported
in EthicandClimate.org over the last several years, (See articles on the website on the US
media in the Index), the US
media has been utterly
ignoring the climate
change justice issues that increasingly have become the most contentious issues
in dispute
in the international search for a global solution to climate
change.
Also despite the fact that the positions that the United States and several other countries have frequently taken
in Internationale climate negotiations have clearly flunked minimum ethical scrutiny, the US
media has largely
ignored the ethical and justice issues raised by the US response to climate
change.
Sow doubt, make up statistics, call for an «open debate,» claim that you are being «silenced and
ignored by the
media and politicians,» claim that your opponents are just a «few bureaucrats and environmental activists,» not real scientists — those are the tactics that will be brought to bear
in the coming months by the CCDs
in their attempt to derail meaningful efforts to respond to global climate
change.
If the traditional
media either
ignore you entirely (because you are just some «stupid blog», as many
in the MSM would put it) or (if they don't
ignore you) choose to represent the climate
change issue as «he said / she said» (as the MSM have done, by and large) your efforts at countering lies are doomed to fail.
unless this case goes to SCC it will be of no value to the rest of canada - a newsreel
media story on Ivan Henrysaid «the judge intentionally labelled Henry vexatious so he would not have a chance to appeal to SCC - the SCC automatically reject the vexatious» i am trying to figure out how this is done -
in my case the ns attorney general defence lawyer had been on my case for years then one week before i sent
in my SCC appeal books she wrote me and said she had moved to the SCC office where my books would be ariving!!!!!!! i reported this to the SCC but my complaint was
ignored - so did the NSAG lawyer get ahold of my books and
change them so SCC judges never seen my arguements - thats how bad they do nt want SLR's to use the courts!!!!!!