Did others before them wish to
ignore established law?
Not exact matches
«Benjamin Suarez and Michael Giorgio engaged in behavior that blatantly
ignored and directly circumvented clearly
established campaign financing
laws,» Anthony said.
«The IELRB
ignored its own precedent and well -
established labor
law to seek an injunction, in Waintroob's words, to «send a message» to the Chicago Teachers Union,» the union said.
Are people just
ignoring and disrespecting
established laws?
Hence, if David and the IPCC etc wish to put forward ideas that
ignore basic physics, meaning that they
ignore the maximum entropy production which the Second
Law says will tend to occur, thus
establishing a stable temperature gradient which, as Big Wave Dave said, «obviates the need for concern over GH gases,» then the onus is on them to prove what they say, not only with valid physics, but also empirical evidence, experiments and studies, as appropriate and as is usually done in physics.
In summary, a strong case can be made that the US emissions reduction commitment for 2025 of 26 % to 28 % clearly fails to pass minimum ethical scrutiny when one considers: (a) the 2007 IPCC report on which the US likely relied upon to
establish a 80 % reduction target by 2050 also called for 25 % to 40 % reduction by developed countries by 2020, and (b) although reasonable people may disagree with what «equity» means under the UNFCCC, the US commitments can't be reconciled with any reasonable interpretation of what «equity» requires, (c) the United States has expressly acknowledged that its commitments are based upon what can be achieved under existing US
law not on what is required of it as a mater of justice, (d) it is clear that more ambitious US commitments have been blocked by arguments that alleged unacceptable costs to the US economy, arguments which have
ignored US responsibilities to those most vulnerable to climate change, and (e) it is virtually certain that the US commitments can not be construed to be a fair allocation of the remaining carbon budget that is available for the entire world to limit warming to 2 °C.
Now that we've
established that
law schools are willing to
ignore and improve upon the actual grades students receive if it will make them and their students look better, maybe its time to talk price?
So,
ignoring the every day English language meaning of the words, is there in fact a clear and precise definition of «assault» (in which case some sources are simply using it incorrectly), or do I just need to accept that there is confusion, even within the
law itself, and rely on context to
establish in any given instance which meaning is meant?
This is not only inconsistent with criminal
law, but it also
ignores the reality that the sharing of images online often occurs spontaneously, instantaneously, and with little forethought, making it difficult to
establish intent.
But do not expect your judge to
ignore statutes and
established common
law.
The suggestion that the beneficial quality of appellants» proposed construction is
established by the fact that the construction would have been consistent with applicable zoning
laws ignores the development in sensibilities and ideals reflected in landmark legislation like New York City's.
This might involve
establishing that he gave inappropriate weight to someone's testimony or that he wrongly applied the
law such as by
ignoring certain evidence that he should have considered.
Contrary to human rights standards which proscribe discrimination and require protection of rights of indigenous peoples to practise and revitalise their cultural traditions [62], the majority's approach apparently dictates a historical search for an actual chain of evolution, under a range of destructive outside influences, to
establish a link with «tradition» which may be of little significance to a community, whilst
ignoring genuine assertions, or interpretations, of traditional
laws and customs by the community itself.