The House budget assumes savings and increases in economic growth that would reduce debt from its current level of 77 percent of GDP to 63 percent by 2027;
ignoring economic effects, debt would fall more gradually to 73 percent in 2027 *.
Not exact matches
This estimate
ignores the budget's claimed
economic growth
effects; it is difficult to determine what debt would be when counting
economic effects based on the information given.
«The
economic powers shall continue to justify the current world system, in which speculation and the aim for financial returns...
ignore... the
effects on the environment and on human dignity... environmental, human and ethical degradation are intimately connected.
The distributional
effects of the policy, which has had a history of cultural convulsions, appeared
ignored in favour of
economic ones.
We can't
ignore the
effect that technology has had on every aspect of our social, industrial, educational, personal and
economic lives.
As a side -
effect, consumers gets used to low prices,
ignoring the fact that such prices may or may not reflect the item's true
economic value: a bestseller acquired for $ 14 by Amazon might be sold for a discounted $ 9.99.
Even there, they
ignore the regressive
effect a carbon tax without rebate will have on the lower
economic spectrum.
«We have focused on the U.S. economy, although the bulk of the
economic damage from climate change will be borne outside of the United States (42), and impacts outside the United States will have indirect
effects on the United States through trade, migration, and possibly other channels» — In other words they
ignored the indirect
effects which are extremely important hence their study is to put it mildly rubbish.
They document that the
effect is logarithmic, but then construct
economic «scenarios» based on various temperature increases, carefully
ignoring any mention of just how massive an amount of oil would have to be burned to achieve that.
«Too expensive to act»: Some contrarians admit that global warming exists, is caused by humans, and indeed has harmful
effects, but assert that it is too expensive to mitigate global warming (they
ignore the principle of risk management, use
economic scenarios that
ignore benefits of new technologies, assume a high «discount rate», and
ignore devastating future
economic costs of unbridled global warming).
Although this is certainly not the primary concern with the nation's current
economic crisis, it is nonetheless an
effect of it that can not be
ignored.