You see, this government knows what's coming down the road is a situation where there is so much scarcity (caused by the looting of trillions of public money &
illegal wars ordered by the bankers) so it wanted to have in place some «tougher» crowd / internet control measures for when we're all marching & protesting against these criminals.
Not exact matches
Or should
illegal orders be refused, for the moral good of * our * side, as the
war needs to end someday, and you don't want soldiers trained to do immoral but expedient and violent acts back amongst * our * citizenry?
Firstly, while we would surely want somewhat intelligent machines to be able to refuse to unjust (or
illegal)
orders, they may also decide against saying «no» to patently unjust
wars, and to unjust actions within
wars, because they may have learned that these actions are the most expedient way to achieve their specified goal.
These are the most significant
illegal log exports since the timber - fuelled civil
wars of the Charles Taylor era, and threaten to undermine the progress the President has made in bringing
order to the forest sector.