They may even feel like a victim themselves, giving
them the illusion of justification for their actions.
Not exact matches
To your last point, when I said choice is an
illusion, I wasn't referring that it is impossible to make that choice, but rather that there is a «right» choice and a «wrong» choice, the «right» one being that you worship god, regardless
of how weird some
of the rituals might be, making you a little more than a robot, acting out a script your given, we're just slightly better because we can justify why we're acting out a command, but it takes years to understand that
justification, in the beginning, you do these rituals because you're given a script and if you don't want to do it, tough.
The traditional problem is to explain the possibility and
justification of this move, bearing in mind the errors and
illusions which sometimes lead us astray.1
Neglecting these «output» and «input» aspects
of legitimacy and giving priority instead to a euronationalist
justification of a European sovereignty in the making could also turn out to be detrimental to individual freedoms: the
illusion of homogeneity it would produce could incite European citizens to support policies sold by political leaders as being in the interest
of the European «community» or «people», but actually only serving a tiny minority.
The above comments by wishful thinking skeptics coming up with all manner
of ways to ignore this elephant in the room are simply delusional, do not be under the
illusion hindsight that they had any sort
of «point» or
justification.
I think it actually is worst than most other choices inasmuch as it is done under the tacit pretense (or
illusion)
of one's occupying «neutral» point
of view and hence exempts one from the burden
of justification.