The refusal of much traditional theology to place the kenotic
image of God at its center has led to impossible tangles in its attempts to interpret the world and human experience.
Not exact matches
Creation is beautiful and good, and humanity upholds
God's
image within it; creation is fallen, evil, corrupt; creation can be, and will be, restored — that triune intuition
of Christian faith provides a template
of meaning that
at least attempts an answer to Gauguin's questions.
But we... with unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory
of the Lord, are being transformed into the same
image from glory to glory, just as by the Spirit
of the Lord... looking unto Jesus the author and finisher
of our faith who for the joy that was set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down
at the right hand
of the throne
of God» 2Corinthians 3, Hebrews12)
But I believe, and am
of strong conviction
at this, that this country is provoking the judgment
of God on itself, by treating it's poor, under - privileged and those who fall through the cracks as a burden, and as a nuisance that is only in the way
of it's «
at all cost» coveted
image of «greatness», instead
of giving a hard and honest look WHY is it the way it is in this country?
Whatever that may mean entirely, it
at least means that to be created in the
image of God means to be imbued to some degree with godly power to manage the world.
At the heart
of all
of this is a passionate conviction that every human is created in the
image and likeness
of God.
When we look
at the Book
of Genesis, we see that the first thing
God is looking for is quite simply «
images» by which to communicate who -
God - is (Genesis 1:26 - 27).
I'm angry
at the patriarchal worldly attitude that centres fathers, forgetting that male and female are made in the
image of God.
But most days,
at heart I see myself as shepherd, as caretaker, as fortunate steward
of these small people, these
images of God.
In the previous study
of Genesis 1:26, we began to look
at what it means to be made in the
image of God.
At what point did the idea that all people are created in the
image of God lose its currency and appeal?
What is created
at that moment is a single new creature — a human person — with the capacity to become conscious and free «in the
image and likeness
of God».
The man who chooses to live in our destiny can neither know the reality
of God's presence nor understand the world as his creation; or,
at least, he can no longer respond — either interiorly or cognitively — to the classical Christian
images of the Creator and the creation.
Second, I believe Scripture teaches that both men and women are created in the
image of God (Genesis 1:27), which means both masculinity and femininity are -
at some level - part
of God's nature.
And it is a dismissive, hurtful way to speak about women, who Piper seems to have forgotten were also created in the
image of God, were appointed by
God as leaders
at critical times in the history
of Israel and the Church, and were the first to whom Jesus appeared when he inaugurated his new Kingdom on Resurrection Day.
Its imagistic character means it stands as a corrective to the bias
of much constructive theology toward conceptual clarity, often
at the price
of imagistic richness.11 Although it would be insufficient to rest in new
images and to refuse to spell out conceptually their implications in as comprehensive a way as possible, the more critical task is to propose what Dennis Nineham calls a «lively imaginative picture»
of the way
God and the world as we know it are related (Nineham, 201 - 2).
The man who can not feel
at least some faint intimation
of this grief is a paltry soul
of base coinage, bearing neither the
image of Caesar nor the
image of God.
Because we are created in
God's
image and the grace
of God is extended equally to women, we can join the company
of those women who first wept in the shadow
of the cross and later rejoiced
at the empty tomb.
If mankind is made in the
image and likeness
of God, don't we have,
at the core
of our being, the qualities
of God?
What Lynch is driving
at with his insistence on the analogical imagination, which finds in the
images of limitation «the path to whatever the self is seeking: to insight, or beauty, or, for that matter, to
God,» is directly related to what I have called metaphor as method.
For, as Caldecott highlights, the Catholic tendency, from Thomas Aquinas through to the contemporary Catechism (one might also add St Augustine and the 14th - century papal Encyclical Benedictus Deus) has been to emphasise that the human soul is not physical, but rather spiritual, in the
image of God's divine nature, and directly created
at conception.
Though revelation stands
at the center and the proper study for the Jew is not simply man, but man confronted by
God, we encounter the
image of God when we encounter the Arnoldian best that has been thought and said, and we understand ourselves and others better when we confront the voice
of the other.
Surely, however, the basic affirmation
of Christian theism, founded (once we have got behind the
images in which often it was phrased) on the biblical witness to the faithfulness and consistency
of God and to his unfailing maintenance
of the creation in being, is that all things
at all times and in all places are present to
God, that he is always
at work in them, that he constantly energizes through them, that he never ceases to move in the creation towards the accomplishment
of his holy will and the revelation
of his holy purpose.
As she continues to read, we hear about Paul's incarceration and persecution, about how Jesus is «the
image of the invisible
God, the firstborn over all creation,» about watching out for all those false teachings that circulated through the trade routes, about how we ought to stop judging each other over differences
of opinion regarding religious festivals and food (I blush a little
at this point and resolved to make peace with some rather opinionated friends before the next sacred meal), about how we should clothe ourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience, and love, about how we must forgive one another, about how the things that once separated Jew from Greek and slave from free are broken down
at the foot
of the cross, about how we should sing more hymns.
Our dual
images of God in the Testaments start to merge together when we see that the suffering
of Christ began in his Father's heart
at the dawn
of creation, when we see
God our Father bearing the cross for our sins.
Fallon points out, «the devout worshipper believes that something has happened, the statue or
image has been transformed into the very body
of god or
at least, into his abode.»
At the annual Together for the Gospel conference in Louisville, Kentucky, megachurch pastor Matt Chandler said he's «deeply concerned» that Christian leaders today are more concerned with projecting a cool
image than leaning into the Word
of God.
The concerns
of those who are more informed should
at least prompt us to stay mindful
of our reliance on technology and how developments could end up undermining the worth, purpose and safety
of human beings, who have been created in
God's
image.
if you recall,
God said, «Let us make man in our
image AND after our likeness...... yes, every man still bears the
image of God and deserves respect, but every man deserves to be pitied for the likeness
of God which he has lost and which can only be restored through a relationship with Jesus Christ, who is more than a book, He is the Living Word
of God, and any relationship with Him demands an obedience to the Word He represents, thus, how can a man «walk humbly with
God» while
at the same time rejecting the His very Word?
God, who
at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Hath in these last days spoken unto us by [his] Son, whom he hath appointed heir
of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; Who being the brightness
of [his] glory, and the express
image of his person, and upholding all things by the word
of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand
of the Majesty on high; Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they.
We are made in
Gods image and thus we need to reflect this
image and His character outwards into the lives
of people...
at their edge
of life and personal hell reflecting
Gods grace, mercy, justice, compassion and forgiveness.
If some Westerners find the
images of gods off - putting, they may also express surprise
at finding that the lingam, the male organ, is the focus
of worship in many temples dedicated to Siva, the third
god of the Hindu trinity.
Hebrews 1:1 KJV
God, who
at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, 2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir
of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; 3 Who being the brightness
of his glory, and the express
image of his person, and upholding all things by the word
of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand
of the Majesty on high; 4 Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they.
What it means to be made in the
image of God may become clearer if we take a look
at our most distinctive traits — those that set us apart from the sub-human world and prompt us to speak
of «the human soul» or «the human spirit.»
• Intentional physical violence
of any kind against a person made in the
image of God solely for entertainment and recreation can not be justified (some pro-lobbyists and Christians cite the Just War thesis, which is
at best woefully naive).
This is to davidnfran hay David you might have brought this up in a previous post I haven't read, but i did read quit a bit about your previous comments and replies
at the beginning
of this blog, so I was just wondering in light
of what hebrews 6 and 10 say how would you enterprite passages like romans 8 verses 28 thrue 39 what point could paul have been trying to make in saying thoughs amazing things in romans chapter 8 verses 28 thrue 39 in light
of hebrews 6 and 10, Pauls says that
god foreknew and also predestined thoughs whom he called to be conformed to the
image of his son so that he would be the first born among many brothers and then he goes on saying that neither death nor life nor angels nor rulers nor things present nor things to come nor powers nor hight nor death can ever separate us from the love
of god in christ jesus so how would i inturprate that in light
of that warning in hebrews 6 and 10,
At its worst, this notion takes the form
of the
image of God as divine lawgiver and judge, who has proclaimed an arbitrary set
of moral rules, who keeps records
of offences, and who will punish offenders.
At the heart
of Christian faith is the figure
of Jesus Christ as «the Express
Image»
of God.
Invoking a scriptural
image of man created as the
image and likeness
of God, he redeployed reason and will, securing —
at least for believers — an enduring human nucleus.
But taken
at face value, they are alienating insofar as they betray us into placing our own possibilities outside
of us as attributes
of God and not
of humanity, viewing ourselves as unworthy objects
of a projected
image of our own essential nature.
The Church's own failure in this respect is itself rooted in a refusal to be informed by the
image of God's humility that lies
at the center
of Christian revelation.
Pagan mythology it is, ensconced in our time and embraced in our church, where we have supposed that we can know the glory
of immortal
God while worshiping also
at the altar
of our powerful and overwhelmingly impressive national Baal, an
image, in the final analysis, simply made by human minds and hands.
Pearson, who described himself
at the time as a «fundamentalist, Pentecostal, evangelical» Christian, asked
God what he could do to help while
images of human suffering flashed on the TV screen.
He is the only possible way
of seeing
God, and
at the same time he is the true
image of humanity.
Hearing the Word
of God no longer matters; now seeing and looking
at an
image are central.
When officers
of the Rabbinical Council ofAmerica balked
at participating in a Catholic - sponsored conference on «Man as the
Image of God,» on the grounds that this was «theology,» the Rav wryly remarked that a conference on «Man as a Purely Naturalistic Being» would not have set off the same alarms.
Images are incapable
of expressing anything
at all about
God.
It didn't happen millions
of billions
of years ago, but
at the same time, a «day» isn't really a 24 - hour day (p. 65) and the only real point
of the creation account is to tell us that
God made mankind in His
image (p. 70).
Here the adoration
of false
gods is not
at issue so much as the confusion that amounts to claiming to represent by an
image what one is going to worship.
Perhaps this is one
of the meanings
of the
image of God: one who responds and is responsible; a counterpart who will dialogue, who is both
at a certain distance and has the ability to communicate.