In faith's response to its kenotic
image of God there lies a surprising way of bringing new meaning to our normally confused sense of mystery, to our puzzlement about evolution and other recent discoveries about the physical universe, to our perplexity at the broken state of social existence, and finally to our own individual longings and sufferings.
In
the image of God there is no limit in man we want it all.
Not exact matches
The good news that Jesus practiced and that mormonism malpractices is that spiritual man is always the
image and likeness
of God, who is all the life
there is.
sam stone Given we are made in the
image of God our core «DNA» (as evidenced by 98 %
of the world population) knows
there is more to this existence than chemical reaction on organic matter.
If man is not created in the
image of God, and if
there is no
God in heaven Who will judge the living and the dead, if
there are no objective standards
of right and wrong — then life becomes cheap.
They could, but you would get as many answers as
there are people, because belief is a very personal thing and we all craft our
gods in our own
image... or in the
image of what we fear most.
The proof is in the pudding so to speak, since man was created by
God in His
image,
there is within every person the knowledge
of God.Standard equipment.In order to become an atheist you first have to lie yourself past your inner knowledge
of God.You have to ignore your life, your spirit, your environment and the whole
of creation.That takes a lot
of lying to oneself, and you have to buy into a lot more lies to get
there.This is not made up, it is a part
of the process that ultimately allows the created to deny the creator,
God.Deep down every atheist knows they are a liar, but as with any repeated sin the suppressed truth gets farther away, and harder to recognize.
God bless
You are aware that
there is also female imagery
of God in the bible and that Genesis does tell us that
God created male and female in his
image.
The building
of the local hospital, the ambulance that got me
there before I died from blood loss, the
image of God in the paramedics that made them give their lives to rescuing people they've never met, the wisdom
of the surgeon, the intelligence and skill
of the thousands
of individuals whose discoveries have made operating theatres and anaesthesia possible — all
of these are gracious gifts
of a loving
God, whose mercy enables healings to take place across the world that would, in any other generation, be considered quite miraculous.
... If we are created in the
image of God, is
there in us the potential to be a little bit like him?
I guess its not their fault, perhaps atheists have a deeper understanding
of evolution since
there ancestors are apes and Christians well, are built in the
image of God.
In which tetragrammaton (Hebrew word meaning Yahweh [a singular
god]-RRB- creates the garden
of eden in the east, and creates a man in his own
image and places him
there, etc, etc..
The Father is
God, and that is why
there is no verse that calls the Father the
image of God.
God's promised fulfillment includes, among other things, the
image of a New Jerusalem where «death shall be no more, neither shall
there be mourning nor crying nor pain any more, for the former things have passed away» (Rev. 21:4) As we begin to engage in the business
of genetic co-creation, how can we be sure that our path goes toward this fulfillment rather than toward some irreversible destruction?
For it to be designed implies
there is a designer and to be in the
image of God to be created and seen as being good meaning that in your truest sense
of who you are, you are good and if that is brought to the for you can't help but do good — it being like breathing,
You are putting them in touch with the
image of God within them, which connects them with the living
God who put it
there.
There are many things we do not understand, facets
of god that has long been lost and long been rewritten by man in his own
image to justify today's needs and actions.
I said
there were four contextual keys to what it means to be made in the
image of God.
By the time Goetz wrote, that theme —
of God hanging
there on the gallows with the innocent sufferer, in the timeless
image Elie Wiesel offered in his book Night — had come to dominate many forms
of Protestant theology.
While it may be possible to work from the idea
of God making humankind in the
image of God back to the Trinity, it requires the assumption that
there is some threefold characteristic to us, either in our constitution or relationship to one another as male and female.
There is no possibility
of understanding history as the
image of God unless we reach a new theological understanding
of both imagery and the imagination.
A radical Christian would interpret these words as meaning that the glory
of the
God of the old covenant is abolished, for apart from an abolition
of the
God of judgment,
there remains no possibility
of transforming humanity into the likeness or
image of the glory
of Christ.
For Genesis, my view is that
God wants to communicate that he is the Creator
of all that
there is, that he has given humanity a special
image - bearing role within it, but our sinfulness has broken that relationship, et cetera — but that he doesn't see a need to give them a science lesson first.
She now believes: «We're all made in the
image of God, and within that
image — whether we're Christians or not —
there is a certain human wisdom.»
I've seen humans as nothing more than highly evolved primates, but I've also seen them as made in the
image of God; I've seen children suffering and been convinced
there is no
God, but I've also sensed
God's presence as I've reached into that same suffering; I've convinced myself that doing whatever I wanted was the most exciting way to live, but I've also found abundant life in being humbly obedient to Jesus.
If Jesus is the exact representation
of God and is the
image of the invisible
God (John 1:14, 18; 14:9 - 11; 2 Cor 4:4; Php 2:6; Col 1:15; Heb 1:2 - 3), but during His life and ministry never revealed the aspect
of God as a warrior, then
there are only two options: either
God is not a warrior and Jesus did truly reveal the Father to us, or Jesus was being deceptive.
sqeptiq... That was a wonderfully «crafted» piece
of «creative» writing... Hence, you have proved that you are indeed «made in the
image»
of the
God who CREATED you... Your post reflects (and demands) creationism... unless you are now going to tell me that those words got
there by «accident»...?
Whatever truth
there may be in the assertion that man makes
God in his own
image, the affirmation
of faith carries with it a clear distinction between the concept
of God (which indeed is man - made, just as all human concepts are man - made) and
God himself.
A Nair reported to the missionaries that after the arrival
of Christianity among the Pulayas the «evil spirits were obliged to run away from the places» and
there was «scarcely any instance
of demonical possession» among them.49 Some
of the priests
of the Pulayas who converted to Christianity demolished the
images of their deities in the presence
of the missionaries, thereby suggesting belief in the power
of the new
God which they had found in Christianity.
The devil has blinded the leaders
of the churches
of today when they serve carved
images of the flag
of any nation... In Exodus and Deuteronomy
God said, not to serve or bow down to any carved
image in the likeness
of heaven above or in the likeness
of the earth below... When you pledge your allegiance to the flag, you are pledging your allegiance to the carved
images of the flag... The founding fathers made carved
images in the likeness
of heaven above and in the likeness
of the earth below and set the carved
images on a flag and the flag is high and lifted up on a flag pole... Some nations are serving the stars, the moon, and the sun, and others are serving the eagle, the bear, and the tree... The U.S. is serving the stars
of heaven and the eagle
of the earth... Canada is serving the leaf
of a tree... Mexico is serving the eagle and the serpent... When you put your right hand to your heart or to your forehead, and pledge your allegiance to the flag, you are committing fornication with the carved
images of the flag,
God calls this IDOLATRY... The mark
of the beast in the right hand or forehead is spiritual and identical to when you put your right hand over your heart or over your forehead...
There is no way to go around
God and the carved
images of the flag, unless the devil has blinded the minds
of the believer, like when he deceived eve and Adam in the garden
of Eden.
There are Churchianity buildings emblazoned with lurid scenes
of a supposed
image of God casting people into some burning pit
of eternal torture.
Growing up with an overwhelming sense that
God was calling you to be a leader in the Church, but where
there are no
images of what that looks like, you begin to have the little question mark in the back
of your head.
As Martin Luther King, Jr. aptly said, «
There are no gradations in the
image of God...
God made us to live together as brothers (and sisters) and to respect the dignity and worth
of every human.»
There are other Latin patristic bridal mystics as well, and, contra Messrs. Clark and Schrader, they use the
image of spiritual marriage to describe the individual believer's union with
God.
But
there is one other facet that needs to be synthesised with this if we are to be able to refound Christian culture: the fact (and the Judaeo - Christian revelation) that my very power
of intelligent observation is in the
image of God's Mind.
This is a false claim as Mitt Romney and the followers
of his church follow after an
image of a false
god and a false Christ in which
there is no salvation (Matthew 24:24).
And at yet another point, we are told that, although evangelicals can not accept all
of what process theists mean when they say that the world is «
God's body»,
there is a «striking parallel» between the process concept
of «
God's self - embodiment in a redeemed world» and «the biblical
image of the church as the «Body
of Christ»» (111).
â $ œIn the beginning
there was faithâ $» which is childish; trustâ $» which is vain; and illusionâ $» which is dangerousâ $ ¦ â $ œWe believed in
God, trusted in man, and lived with the illusion that every one
of us has been entrusted with a sacred spark from the Shekkinahâ $ ™ s flame; that every one
of us carries in his eyes and in his soul a reflection
of Godâ $ ™ s
image.
There is a sense in which they are not all
God intended for them to be; they are marred, but they are still people who bear in a unique way the
image of God.
While
there may be some truth in this, working this Step is more a matter
of defining
God in AA's
image (Ragge, The Real AA, p. 117; bold face added).
Colossians 1:15: He is the
image of the invisible
God, the firstborn
of all creation.Paul articulately asserts the truth
of the Incarnation in Colossians 1, but his use
of «firstborn» does not mean that
there was a time when the Son
of God wasn't (any more than John 3:16's use....
There isn't one god... And there isn't even one god for every religion... Every religious person creates a god in their own image, and prays to it... So there are actually billions and billions of different gods, each one being a unique figment of someone's imagina
There isn't one
god... And
there isn't even one god for every religion... Every religious person creates a god in their own image, and prays to it... So there are actually billions and billions of different gods, each one being a unique figment of someone's imagina
there isn't even one
god for every religion... Every religious person creates a
god in their own
image, and prays to it... So
there are actually billions and billions of different gods, each one being a unique figment of someone's imagina
there are actually billions and billions
of different
gods, each one being a unique figment
of someone's imagination.
And even where
there has been progress toward a more humanizing view
of the absolute, alienating elements still cling to our
God -
images.
I notice that you say that number one preparation approach is»
There is a
God (and He looks like Jesus)» I find this so difficult because as I look around I see a supposedly portrait
image of Jesus that has been around for centuries and which I am sure is not only, not like Jesus, but is very misleading.
We were created to be
image - bearers
of the Almighty
God together, so
there is no room for that language or practice without some serious hermeneutical gymnastics and soul damage.
Again, the sticky wicket appears when we press the
image of God as the future to ask if
there is an absolute, pre-determined future toward which
God is drawing us.
But in the making
of images there is the danger
of fomenting idolatry, and inviting the confusion
of the reality with the
image, when the original is, like
God, unimaginable.
There are three implications
of this way
of understanding the
image of God in man, which have important consequences for our understanding
of man's estrangement from
God and the consequent disorder in his existence.
Here,
God appears as being absolutely sovereign and transcendent, so transcendent that
there can be no human language about
God, and so sovereign that
God can be known only by way
of the
image of the Creator, and this is an «
image» that negates all human vision
of God, an
image totally confining man to the creaturely realm, to the secular, or to the «world.»
In western Europe in the Middle Ages, for example, technology was directly spurred by a belief, namely that
there are some kinds
of work too degrading for creatures made in the
image of God to do.16 The result
of this view was a great increase in the invention
of laborsaving devices.