However, if there is a Lawyer that is suggesting this dollar amount represents sufficient quantum to justify their participation in any litigation, I'm inclined to think that unlike
the imaginary subject property, their office wouldn't be just outside the GTA, and that their office would be more than likely just outside of the Earth's atmosphere!
Not exact matches
If you're going to argue with them about gravity you need to first point out they don't have any, because they have created an entirely
imaginary world for their Greenhouse Effect of
imaginary molecules without the real gas
properties which make real gases
subject to gravity.
They can't understand this real oxgen and nitrogen blanket because they don't have gravity, they don't have gravity because they don't have «real» gases
subject to gravity, with volume, weight, attraction etc., and in its place have subsituted the
imaginary massless hard dot of nothing «ideal» gas not
subject to gravity without these real gas
properties.