The Ninth Circuit wrote that «in light of the Government's shifting interpretations of the Executive Order, we can not say that the current interpretation by White House counsel, even if authoritative and binding, will persist past
the immediate stage of these proceedings.»
Not exact matches
[6] In its explanatory note to the proposal, the Commission also states that suspects not only should have an effective (Article 10), but also a specific and
immediate remedy at any
stage of the criminal
proceedings when evidence is obtained in breach
of the right to remain silence or the privilege not to incriminate oneself, save in very exceptional circumstances where the use
of such evidence would not prejudice the overall fairness
of the
proceedings (§ 36
of the explanatory note).
These include
proceedings in which the judge has a personal bias or prejudice against a party, when the judge has served as an attorney or witness in the case or any
stage of it, and when the judge or a member
of the judge's
immediate family has a financial interest in the case.