Sentences with phrase «immigration court cases»

The school also provides health care through its on - site clinic, legal representation in immigration court cases, and culturally relevant after - school programming.

The school also provides health care through its on - site clinic, legal representation in immigration court cases, and culturally relevant after - school programming.

Not exact matches

And that means several cases important to small business — dealing with issues including health care, immigration, unions, and small business contracting — may leave lower court rulings standing for some time.

President Donald Trump plans to take the court case regarding his executive order on immigration «through the system» and, if need be, to the Supreme Court, he said Tuecourt case regarding his executive order on immigration «through the system» and, if need be, to the Supreme Court, he said TueCourt, he said Tuesday.

The High Court case was related to an immigration dispute involving a Nigerian man who argued that he should not be deported because the unborn child being carried by his Irish partner had multiple rights, including the right to the company of its father.

The court heard from prosecutor Edward Lucas who said: «The weddings that form the subject of this case were neither conducted correctly or legally and their sole purpose was to facilitate an industrial - scale abuse of the system of immigration control within the UK.»

Rubashkin's lawyers claimed Thursday that U.S. District Court Chief Judge Linda Reade, the judge in the case, met with the law - enforcement team that participated in the May 2008 immigration raid of Agriprocessors kosher meatpacking plant in Postville, Iowa.

The memo, which was circulated to prison governors on November 26th, reads: «The criminal casework directorate (CCD) of the Border and Immigration Agency have confirmed to us that as a rule they have no interest in pursuing foreign national prisoners serving sentences of less than 12 months for deportation unless they have a court recommendation for deportation, are already subject to deportation proceedings, or (in the case of non-EEA nationals) were sentenced to less than 12 months but where the current sentence plus one or two previous sentences within the last five years (taking account of the most significant sentences during the period) total 12 months or more.»

Only those who appeal against removal will have their case heard by a judge and even then it will be an immigration judge at a tribunal, not in a criminal court.

There are also cases of other law - enforcement agencies taking related actions, such as Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) arresting and deporting back an in - coming witness or plaintiff who has valid court papers and visa.

SPEAKING ON Law Day May 3 at the Court of Appeals in Albany, Gov. David Paterson unveiled his plan to create a panel to review immigration cases.

Kenyan asylum seeker wins high court case after being placed in segregation for 28 hours in immigration removal centre

SAN DIEGO — An Indiana - born federal judge, whose Mexican heritage Donald Trump used to paint him as biased against him in a 2016 court case because of his immigration stance,...

The turn in court comes after Ms. James had previously called on the city's lawyers represent, pro bono, children facing deportation cases in the federal government's surge docket, and had promised to do so herself after a refresher on family and immigration law.

An Accra High court will today [Friday] hear a case brought against Interior Minister, Ambrose Dery and the Comptroller General of Immigration, Kwame Sakyi by an Indian national who is contesting his deportation from Ghana.

She boosted the city budget to include more money to connect unaccompanied minor children facing immigration cases with lawyers to argue on their behalf in court during an immigration surge docket.

But until that supreme court case at least, we have earned the moniker of the least family friendly country in the developed world when it comes to immigration.

The Judson Church demonstration, organized by the New York Immigration Coalition (NYIC), convened immigrants, advocacy groups and clergy members, who urged the Supreme Court to proceed with the DACA / DAPA case and help eliminate the fear of deportation for millions of people.

The court has already heard — but not decided — big cases involving immigration, abortion, affirmative action and public employee unions.

Benefits will go unpaid, court cases will be postponed, police leave has been cancelled in London and airports are bracing themselves for backlogs at immigration.

That constitutional right, however, is not granted to undocumented immigrants whose cases are typically handled in civil, not criminal, court and who often do not have access to free counseling to help navigate immigration proceedings.

In the months since Scalia's passing, the country's highest bench has split four - four on a number of crucial cases, ranging from immigration to public sector unions — leaving a lower court's ruling in place.

In Guitierrez - Brizuela v. Lynch, a 2016 immigration case, Gorsuch waved a red flag against the «Chevron deference» — a doctrine under which courts are supposed to defer to federal agencies on interpretations of rules that developed from a 1984 decision, Chevron v. National Resources Defense Council.

The U.S. Justice Department is pushing for immigration courts to prioritize cases involving unaccompanied minors, and members of Congress have outlined proposals that involve fast - tracking their immigration cases to enable prompt removal.

In the 1982 case Plyler v. Doe, the Supreme Court ruled that students» access to a public education can not be denied based on their immigration status.

The U.S. Justice Department is reducing the huge backlog in the immigration courts by using video - streaming to enable U.S. judges in Puerto Rico to oversee cases in mainland courtrooms, despite the huge damage inflicted on the island by recent storms.

But Attorney General Jeff Sessions stepped into the case sua sponte and assigned it to himself for review, a power that the attorney general has over the immigration courts.

Furthermore, for already filed documents we can speak with immigration officers for you, schedule any necessary inquiries, handle your case in court and file any needed appeals or waivers.

Thanks to Governor Jerry Brown, illegal immigration status can no longer be used as admissible evidence in court during personal injury or wrongful death cases.

In co-operation with the Gutierrez Law Firm, which is headquartered in San Antonio (where most immigration court proceedings must be held for Central Texas cases), Dunnam & Dunnam is dedicated to upholding the rights of individuals who wish to enter the United States on a temporary or permanent basis, helping ordinary people realize their dreams and aspirations.

In addition, for already filed documents we are able to speak with immigration officers on your behalf, schedule any needed inquiries, handle your case in court and file any required appeals or waivers.

He is known as an expert in EU immigration law and has litigated key test cases before the European Court of Justice.

«Court Urges Review of New York Judge's Immigration Cases That Are on Appeal»: The New York Times today contains an article that begins, «In a move that immigration lawyers say is highly unusual, a federal appeals court has recommended that a Justice Department appeals board review all immigration cases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking asCourt Urges Review of New York Judge's Immigration Cases That Are on Appeal»: The New York Times today contains an article that begins, «In a move that immigration lawyers say is highly unusual, a federal appeals court has recommended that a Justice Department appeals board review all immigration cases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seekImmigration Cases That Are on Appeal»: The New York Times today contains an article that begins, «In a move that immigration lawyers say is highly unusual, a federal appeals court has recommended that a Justice Department appeals board review all immigration cases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking asCases That Are on Appeal»: The New York Times today contains an article that begins, «In a move that immigration lawyers say is highly unusual, a federal appeals court has recommended that a Justice Department appeals board review all immigration cases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seekimmigration lawyers say is highly unusual, a federal appeals court has recommended that a Justice Department appeals board review all immigration cases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking ascourt has recommended that a Justice Department appeals board review all immigration cases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seekimmigration cases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking ascases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking asylum.

Under a new law that was passed, courts will no longer be allowed to inquire about plaintiffs» immigration statuses in personal injury cases.

The article quotes at length from a recent decision in National Day Laborer Organizing Network et al. v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency, et al., a United States District Court case arising -LSB-...]

Moreover, for already filed documents we are able to speak with immigration officers on your behalf, schedule any needed inquiries, handle your case in court and file any needed appeals or waivers.

The Supreme Court ruling further jeopardizes access to the courts, as subjecting individuals to mandatory detention means that an immigration judge does not have the authority to consider an individual's bond case.

Prior to Mukasey's opinion, many federal courts and the Board of Immigration Appeals held that immigrants denied competent counsel could reopen their cases on constitutional grounds.

Prior to the job opening, I had been working on a motion to reopen... Prior to doing weed law I did immigration and criminal law, and I was a immigration lawyer on a case, and the criminal lawyer was sitting in court waiting for my current boss to have a fight with a DEA agent on the stand who was refusing service.

Family law, immigration and extradition cases formed a large proportion of the Supreme Court's work in the last financial year, its annual report shows.

Of the hundreds of federal subagencies today, just three of those subagencies — the Social Security Administration, Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals, and the U.S. Immigration Court — are reported to maintain a backlog of approximately 3 million cases.

The case comes before the court at a time of even greater focus on immigration issues, and with a president - elect who has promised to increase deportations.

Interestingly, in that case the Court never addressed the issue of whether the plaintiff's immigration status is admissible.

Translators can be certified as experts in particular cases and many courts have local rules governing the certification of translations for live translation of court proceedings, as the court system of legally obliged to provide translation services to non-English speaking defendants in criminal and immigration cases (and sometimes more broadly).

And if all of this is not enough to make the case significant, it also may reveal the justices» views on presidential power and immigration that could be relevant to other issues pending in the lower courts, such as President Trump's repeal of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program and the challenges to President Trump's threatening to withhold federal funds from cities and states that do not cooperate with immigration officials.

This case was followed shortly thereafter by an immigration law case in the Federal Court which occurred in July 2005, 2005 FC 1050, at para 10 ``... That evidence included a variety of items such as newspaper articles, an e-mail «blog» and a report by a human rights organization...» (e-mail «blog» in quotations in original source).

If the Court were to follow the opinion of AG Mengozzi in this particular case, this could have a serious impact on the legal landscape and context of EU immigration and asylum law.

Today many thousands of cases are started in the Administrative Court every year, even though there has been a dramatic reduction in the number in the last few years, as the majority of immigration judicial review cases are now heard in the Upper Tribunal.

When you already filed some documents, we will be in a position to speak with immigration officers instead of you, handle your case in court and schedule any inquiries that are required.

Court and tribunal fees: the government announced that it will drop increases of up to 500 % in tribunal fees for immigration and asylum cases — see this report by The Independent.