Sentences with phrase «immortal apeman»

If every actual entity is objectively (not subjectively) immortal (and immortal in terms of its concrete objective individuality or totality, and not merely in terms of some of its aspects or feelings), then God as consequent would save every value.

We do not mean a ghostly or immortal part of that Jesus which has survived death.

This non-divine knowledge, like the Word, is alive and immortal, but must accept freely the divine will for its actualisation, in order to be sealed as true being.

He had an immortal soul, and he needed to know about the love God has shown in Jesus Christ.

He was so grateful that he could write: «To the King of ages, immortal, invisible, the only wise God, be honor and glory for ever and ever.»

As we seek prayerfully to interpret the gospels, either publicly or alone, we feel his living presence, objectively immortal in God and revealed to us as we search the scriptures.

A passage of Paul's clarifies the problem somewhat: people «exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man or birds or animals or reptiles» (Rom.

For one thing, it is inconsistent to believe that the same person is raised up at the end of time unless his or her soul is immortal.

On the other hand, neither is he an abstract, philosophical, metaphysical, unfeeling, immortal, eternal God, as human reflection conceives him.

What connection, if any, is there between the immortal life of the dead and the mortal life of the living?

Prayer for First Sunday of Advent: «Almighty God, give us grace to cast away the works of darkness, and put on the armor of light, now in the time of this mortal life in which your Son Jesus Christ came to visit us in great humility; that in the last day, when he shall come again in his glorious majesty to judge both the living and the dead, we may rise to the life immortal; through him who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and forever.

Moreover, if the personal immortality of the soul is effected by God and God alone, then the resurrection of the body in its immortal dimension would also be God's act.

But he could not tell them why Aquinas thought the soul is immortal, as Aquinas undoubtedly did, and his paper ran out with a discussion of understanding, not the soul.

So when eternal conscious torment is the very question at hand, what biblical evidence would you point to as teaching that the resurrected bodies of the lost will likewise be made immortal?

You will have immortal acclaim — or some worthwhile customized version of it.

Adam and Eve were created as immortal beings, able to have intimate fellowship with their Creator.

The minimal claim of process thought is that «by reason of the relativity of all things» each actual entity is preserved everlastingly in the divine experience.154 «God is immortal,» Hartshorne writes, «and whatever becomes an element in the life of God is therefore imperishable... I think the idea of omniscience implies that we have such an abiding presence in the mind of God.

He argues that the current emphasis on the resurrection of the body is incoherent without the idea that the soul is immortal — «belief in the resurrection of the body without the immortality of the soul... fails to secure the resurrection of the same person» (p. 115).

While they were created to have intimate fellowship with God, the Bible doesn't say Adam and Eve were created as immortal beings.

And don't give us this «sting of humility» crap if you believe that you are made in the image of a God, the most powerful force in the universe listens to you telepathically, and you are immortal.

It is what Paul called the exchange of «the splendour of immortal God for an image shaped like mortal man (Rom.

If immortality of the soul is the case of the immortal soul freed from the body, we might have expected a more Socratic Jesus.

Pagan mythology it is, ensconced in our time and embraced in our church, where we have supposed that we can know the glory of immortal God while worshiping also at the altar of our powerful and overwhelmingly impressive national Baal, an image, in the final analysis, simply made by human minds and hands.

Hartshorne's view of immortality is neither the humanistic one of immortality through posterity nor the Greek one of an immortal soul nor the biblical one of bodily resurrection but a very special one of being eternally remembered in the mind of God.

If you asked St. Augustine why he believed in an immortal soul, I suspect he'd look at you quizzically, raise an eyebrow, and utter a dismissive, «Because St. Paul did!»

... You see, these misguided creatures start with the general conviction that they are immortal for all time, which explains the contempt of death and voluntary self - devotion which are so common among them; and then it was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws.

But they said they'd no need, being immortal objectively.

Saraswati: Christians don't get a pass on rudeness just because they want to save our «immortal soul».

The affirmation that the Word of God has finally become man calls upon man to accept his own humanity and to abandon all mythological pretensions to be an immortal god.

For let us assume that the flower concluded its story in another fashion and added, «The story is not over, for when I am dead, I am immortal.»

No it's never over because God created man in His image with an immortal soul.

If they want to threaten, first they have to prove that humans actually have «immortal souls», then they have to prove that heaven, hell and their god exist at all.

@RL, I agree that's rude, but in fairness to the Chrisians, they are trying to save your immortal soul.

Also, the popular idea of a mysterious, nonphysical, immortal soul temporarily attached to the body is unacceptable.

How, then, could it be true that the prophecies were fulfilled which spoke of the congregation of the righteous being transfigured into the glory of an immortal life?

And I am right, chosen and immortal?

Science can never prove or disprove the existence of an all - powerful supernatural being, it can never prove or disprove the existence of an afterlife, of immortal souls, and so on.

Their branches were flourishing and their fruits were shining, their roots were from an immortal land And a river of gladness irrigating them, and the region round about them in the land of eternal life.

I see no paradox in holding that truths are immortal and also holding that many truths are unknown.

In his Apology, due to the Cycle of Opposites, states that since people are alive they must have been once dead thus the human soul is immortal.

By perishing in its subjective, present immediacy the actual occasion becomes objectively immortal, as the process of becoming unified terminates in a unified being capable of causally influencing those processes of becoming which supersede it.

When Gregory wrote his Pastoral Rule there was present to his mind the immature and sinful yet immortal race whose members needed the service of the pastoral ruler on their wayward course of life that they might escape hell and enter into heaven's joy.

The key question is this, what does it mean to say that an actual entity is objectively immortal?

My church shunned me, my parents fear for my immortal soul, and many of my friends left me.

Admittedly there is no returning to the picture of immortal life in a supernatural heaven.

To have experienced and understood, in order to teach others to experience and understand, that all human enrichment is but dross except inasmuch as it becomes the most precious and incorruptible of all things by adding itself to an immortal centre of love: such is the supreme knowledge and the ultimate lesson to be imparted by the Christian educator.

If you get a general notion of what is meant by perishing, you will have accomplished an apprehension of what you mean by memory and causality, what you mean when you feel that what we are is of infinite importance, because as we perish we are immortal — Essays in Science and Philosophy 117.

According to Theodore, if God had made the human being as immortal and immutable to begin with, we would be differentiated in no way from the irrational creation, since we would have no knowledge of our own good.

The Whiteheadian answer to these questions is simply that the past is preserved as objectively immortal in the consequent nature of God and has what efficacy it has on the present as a result of the role played by God at the birth of every actual occasion.

«Now unto the King eternal, immortal, invisible, to the only wise God be honor and glory, forever and ever.