Sentences with phrase «immortal beings in»

I suspect Infinity War will draw from the comic book The Thanos Quest, a two - issue comic book that sees Thanos hunting down powerful, immortal beings in order to assemble the Infinity Gauntlet:

And dealing with immortal beings in the movies always comes down to who can hit or knock the other against stone walls the hardest.

Not exact matches

300 knockoff Immortals did come in first with a little over $ 31 million in ticket sales, but that's a whopping 45 percent less than [300's] opening weekend....

If your Facebook page continues to operate after you die, in some sense you are immortal.

I really think a lot of people have no idea the extent to which Canada is, in the immortal words of the Arrogant Worms, rocks and trees and trees and rocks.

Or has the act of making a public appearance at which investors are pitched mean you are already necessarily under 506 (c) and, in the immortal interjection of Gov. Perry, whoops, you'd better have filed your Form D 15 days back already?

In the event you aren't immortal (spoiler alert: you're not), your coworkers should be aware of your plans.

This is why divine incarnation, according to the hymn in Philippians 2, shows us God in lowliness and humility: It is quite a come - down for the immortal and incorruptible God to take up our mortality and corruptibility, making it his own.

His point is that he thinks it is completely absurd theory that all 7,000,000,000 human beings on the planet are simultaneously being supervised 24 hours a day, every day of their lives by an immortal, invisible being for the purposes of reward or punishment in the «afterlife».

Oh, and don't forget we have immortal souls too, because I don't like the idea of not existing in some form or another for the rest of eternity, what I have on this beutiful earth is just not enough to satisfy the greed for more...

Catholicism is the belief that an all - knowing, immortal being, powerful enough to create the entire Universe and its billions of galaxies, has a personal interest in my $ ex life.

Christians believe that a mortal person has an immortal soul, and that this immortal soul can be provided with a resurrected, «sanctified» (which effectively means purified, unblemished, and apparently lacking genitalia) body... the term Eternal Life tends to be used to describe the idea that a «True Believer» in Christ (a term open to many, many interpretations) will have their immortal soul implanted in that resurrected body and they will get to live for all time with Christ, apparently singing a lot and doing very little else.

Which teaches us we are an immortal soul going through successive lives in a quest to be better spirits.

You'll find out in due time that He not only exists, but will be the One whom you will face after your mortal frame releases your immortal soul.

Please, any Christian, honestly answer the following: The completely absurd theory that all 7,000,000,000 human beings are simultaneously being supervised 24 hours a day, every day of their lives by an immortal, invisible being for the purposes of reward or punishment in the «afterlife» comes from the field of: (a) Astronomy; (b) Medicine; (c) Economics; or (d) Christianity You are about 70 % likely to believe the entire Universe began less than 10,000 years ago with only one man, one woman and a talking snake if you are a: (a) historian; (b) geologist; (c) NASA astronomer; or (d) Christian I have convinced myself that gay $ ex is a choice and not genetic, but then have no explanation as to why only gay people have ho.mo $ exual urges.

Apparently you just ignored the whole point that there is a difference between the concepts of «immortality», where everyone will be resurrected and become immortal no matter who you are since physical death came abut through Adam and the fall, and «eternal life», which is living with God or in other words it deals with the quality of that immortal life.

God is doing something about all the destruction of this world, and has a solution — Faith in His Son Jesus Christ will get you forgiveness of all your sins, eternal life in an immortal body, and everything good you could ever imagine, both now and in heaven.

Basically you are admitting that you are a christian, not in order to be a good person, but because you fear death and want to be immortal.

Typically this process leads to a characterization of God as a being so advanced, powerful, immortal, and not subject to the laws of time, matter, and space that his followers can make up any excuse they choose to address questions, since nothing about their god (or gods) can be subjected to any kind of objective verification or scrutiny, just like everything else in the religion.

In the Manichean Psalter the soul on its way to the realm of the immortals says, «I will cast my body upon the earth from which it was assembled... the enemy of the soul» (75:13 ff.).

Just think, we have the free will to choose of to be or not to be with God, we could float out there in that vast space of the universe as immortal souls until eternity experiencing a drastic changes in temperature, or not experiencing hot and cold anymore, and just floating in that vast space without being with God.

In the century before Christ Lucretius wrote: «Of course, to think that mortal and immortal could live, sense, act, in mutual partnership is nonsense»In the century before Christ Lucretius wrote: «Of course, to think that mortal and immortal could live, sense, act, in mutual partnership is nonsense»in mutual partnership is nonsense».

It is because we have immortal souls that, apart from sin, we would have been immortal in body as well.

Being immortal walking in communion with God would lead one to believe man was in spirit form.

I guess nothing was supposed to reproduce in the beginning either, because immortal beings having children with impunity would definitely be bad for the planet.

In the second book of the De anima, in a remark that anticipates his claim in Book three that a part of the soul (the intellect) is separable and immortal, Aristotle appears to allude to the sort of Platonic dualism that he would rejecIn the second book of the De anima, in a remark that anticipates his claim in Book three that a part of the soul (the intellect) is separable and immortal, Aristotle appears to allude to the sort of Platonic dualism that he would rejecin a remark that anticipates his claim in Book three that a part of the soul (the intellect) is separable and immortal, Aristotle appears to allude to the sort of Platonic dualism that he would rejecin Book three that a part of the soul (the intellect) is separable and immortal, Aristotle appears to allude to the sort of Platonic dualism that he would reject.

He might easily have come to us in His immortal glory, but in that case we could never have endured the greatness of the glory; and therefore it was that He, who was the perfect bread of the Father, offered Himself to us as milk, as to infants.

He made us to delight in the power of sexual love to bring forth new human beings, children of God, created with immortal souls.

At the end of the day he is still a billionaire and can go back to his mansion as he chooses, or in Jesus» case immortal, so in dying sacrificed nothing.

Mascall believes, first, that although the body of man may have evolved, the immortal soul of man was directly created by God and conjoined to his body at some point in the evolutionary ascent.

Why was an immortal spirit placed in the world and in time, just as the fish is drawn up out of the water and cast upon the beach?»

Though the notion of an immortal soul is what pastors and priests preach in churches, since that is what people want so much to believe, many modern theologians reject the view that the doctrine of the immortal soul has always been part of Judaism.

Although such a doctrine of an immortal soul is usually appealed to in order to answer questions about the meaning of death, it is logical to assert that the soul, whose existence is independent of the body, may therefore originate independently from the body.

The sources of the trinitarian doctrine is quite clear from history, and with it came beliefs in various things like transubstantiation, theosis, that Mary was a perpetual virgin free from sin, infant baptism, ecclesiastical hierarchy, bishop succession, the phoenix, that the world is made up of fire, water, earth and air, and that things formed of one element are immortal while things formed of many elements are mortal.

He saw the soul as the source of movement in every body which moved of itself, and because the soul is thus self - moving, it must be unbegotten and immortal.

It further seemed a matter of common - sense to ancient man that this inner spirit or soul, which he knew from the inside and which he witnessed in his fellows, should be immortal or deathless.

If our lives are objectively immortal in God, as they are on Whitehead's view, we really don't have the slightest bit of choice about the matter.

kermit4jc So, you're saying that humans would be immortal if we had access to the fruit of the Tree of Life that was also in the Garden?

It would be neither immortal nor resurrected in the full sense of the general resurrection of the dead.

The second view is akin to the classical Greek vision of an immortal soul being liberated from imprisonment in the physical body.

It is also timeless — not so different from the «immortal longings» evoked by Shakespeare or the anxious concerns John Calvin discerned in his parishioners.

Hartshorne reasons that if the past is not in some sense eternally and perfectly preserved, that is, if the past is not immortal, then it follows that in the more or less distant future, it will be the same as if we had never chosen one action as opposed to any other; indeed, it would be the same as if we had never existed at all.

This last fundamental religious conviction is, to my knowledge, as much as black theology in North America has ever affirmed, and there is nothing essential in this which is overturned by preferring objective immortality to personal immortality and immortal souls.

t its most fundamental level, Christianity requires a belief that an all - knowing, all - powerful, immortal being created the entire Universe and its billions of galaxies 13,720,000,000 years ago (the age of the Universe) sat back and waited 10,000,000,000 years for the Earth to form, then waited another 3,720,000,000 years for human beings to gradually evolve, then, at some point gave them eternal life and sent its son to Earth to talk about sheep and goats in the Middle East.

On the other hand, Jesus» ascent through the resurrection and new immortal life truly re-enacts the miracle of the primordial act of the actualization of existents in a sort of «upward» or «backward» sense — that is just as creative aspect of Jesus who brought humanity into being through «the Spirit or the Thought», the word kun — out of the recesses of the darkness of non-being [SN], his return through resurrection, potentially leads humanity back to the state of uns in him.

Is our bodiliness valuable enough to be included in our immortal existence?

For Wood we do not need to posit something ahistorically and cross-culturally universal to all human beings, something «objective» like an invisible and immortal soul (which paideia presupposed in ancient Athens), of which «dispositions» and «character traits» are modifications.

I've been reading Michael Newton's «Journey of Souls» and the first words in the book are» See through the eyes of the immortal soul.»

but everyone is in spiritual bodies the only difference is whether you make the first resurrection of the millennium those who made it will be in their immortal spiritual bodies which the second death will not affect them.

This difficulty would however be mitigated if we could say (as Whitehead himself however nowhere does, as far as I know) that it is not actual entities which are objectively immortal in the constitution of other actual entities, but the characters, or forms of their experience which are reproduced» (op.