Sentences with phrase «immortal souls»

Indeed, three years ago, 7,500 unwitting shoppers who did not read some terms and conditions agreed to give a British gaming company their immortal souls:

I'm very nearly sure that the Earth is round, about equally sure that there is no God and that we do not have immortal souls, but I admit that I may be wrong.

If you say the bible, Aristotle, Plato (who decided animals did not have immortal souls, and also advocated lying for a supposedly good cause), or Church doctrine then you yourself are arguing from alleged authority.

Otto Rank (at one time a protege of Freud), broke with his master and posited that we are, rather, motivated by the undeniable conflict between our sense of ourselves as «immortal souls,» and our realization that we exist by virtue of our all - too - mortal bodies, that we are desperate to believe that we will, somehow, live beyond our bodies, and that, in order to do so, we pursue «immortality projects,» that we invest in our activities the promise of eternal life.

By mid-October they were haggard, shell - shocked, and sleep - deprived, weighing the cost of their immortal souls against the benefit of getting their students to listen, follow directions, and complete an occasional assignment.

Like... the living and the dead... Kevin: All the immortal souls.

For in their faith they are vindicated as immortal souls, and from this enhancement of their dignity they find the reason why they must offer a perpetual challenge to the dominion of men over men.

We are Hindu so far as our physical and mental constitution is concerned, but in regard to our immortal souls we are Catholic.

If souls are eternal and the only choice available is either heaven or hell at the end of this brief respite called life, where were these immortal souls of ours before conception / birth?

In the company of God and of immortal souls even family responsibility is greater and more inclusive than in the company of nations and of men who are regarded as purely temporal beings.

This democratization of learning neatly fit into Luther's emphasis on the priesthood of all believers, Protestantism's view that individuals should make their own decisions about the future of their immortal souls, and the Renaissance insistence that learning and ideas should be available to all.

Because according to the teaching of Scripture, death is sleep, a prolonged sleep which will eventually end, and then the bodies of the dead will reawaken as they are reunited with their immortal souls.

Conditionalists begin with the premise that only God is inherently immortal, despite what Socrates and Plato might have said about immortal souls.

We were not born with immortal souls.

I can totally get «wouldn't it be cool if our sense of consciousness survived our physical deaths and we got to hang out with the consciousnesses of all the people we loved who died» but the jump from that to «I'm positive we have immortal souls» seems too much like wishful thinking that's been codified by some form of group consensus.

Thus he maintains that God breathed human immortal souls into a male and female pair of hominoids, when they had emerged with a sufficient level of consciousness.

’28 He concluded his book with the words, «But the sons of Abraham, with their victorious mother, are gathered together unto the place of their ancestors, having received pure and immortal souls from God, to whom be glory for ever and ever.

We have immortal souls, and there are only two places for those souls to go: to God, our creator, or to satan who deceived those who didn't think it being important to pursue and seek God.

But the legal victors had to be people like the Jehovah's Witnesses, plaintiffs who claimed that God made commands known to them that they must obey or else endanger their immortal souls.

If they want to threaten, first they have to prove that humans actually have «immortal souls», then they have to prove that heaven, hell and their god exist at all.

Science can never prove or disprove the existence of an all - powerful supernatural being, it can never prove or disprove the existence of an afterlife, of immortal souls, and so on.

This last fundamental religious conviction is, to my knowledge, as much as black theology in North America has ever affirmed, and there is nothing essential in this which is overturned by preferring objective immortality to personal immortality and immortal souls.

God did not create hell for people, He created as a place for immortal souls (angels primarily) that have no intent on living in an ordered eternity.

The Greeks still have plenty of praying to free their immortal souls from the depths of Hell.

The religious census pitch is relatively new among those concerned about the eternal status of immortal souls.

He made us to delight in the power of sexual love to bring forth new human beings, children of God, created with immortal souls.

It is because we have immortal souls that, apart from sin, we would have been immortal in body as well.

Just think, we have the free will to choose of to be or not to be with God, we could float out there in that vast space of the universe as immortal souls until eternity experiencing a drastic changes in temperature, or not experiencing hot and cold anymore, and just floating in that vast space without being with God.

Id add my own: If a god, any god, Christian,,, doesn't matter created the whole works, why is this Power very regional... with our «immortal souls» at risk — you would think that this God would have had a better press corp, a better travel agency... to the point that he could have gone gobal from the start.

Oh, and don't forget we have immortal souls too, because I don't like the idea of not existing in some form or another for the rest of eternity, what I have on this beutiful earth is just not enough to satisfy the greed for more...

An atheist then can justly describe an encounter with a pod of whales, for example, as a spiritual experience while still understanding that he doesn't have an immortal soul.

Christians believe that a mortal person has an immortal soul, and that this immortal soul can be provided with a resurrected, «sanctified» (which effectively means purified, unblemished, and apparently lacking genitalia) body... the term Eternal Life tends to be used to describe the idea that a «True Believer» in Christ (a term open to many, many interpretations) will have their immortal soul implanted in that resurrected body and they will get to live for all time with Christ, apparently singing a lot and doing very little else.

Which teaches us we are an immortal soul going through successive lives in a quest to be better spirits.

You'll find out in due time that He not only exists, but will be the One whom you will face after your mortal frame releases your immortal soul.

ezek 18:4 shows us that the soul is indeed mortal and can die despite what the church teaches about an immortal soul.

Search all of scripture and you will never find the phrase «immortal soul» anywhere.

The concept of an undying, immortal soul goes against the Bible, which teaches that souls are subject to death.

His immortal soul ascended above the cross, leaving behind a corpse that was no longer Jesus.

Mascall believes, first, that although the body of man may have evolved, the immortal soul of man was directly created by God and conjoined to his body at some point in the evolutionary ascent.

Though the notion of an immortal soul is what pastors and priests preach in churches, since that is what people want so much to believe, many modern theologians reject the view that the doctrine of the immortal soul has always been part of Judaism.

More will be said on the Biblical view of man later, but it is sufficient to point out here, that it is just because the Bible hardly anywhere reflects a doctrine of an immortal soul, that the Christian hope took the form of the resurrection of the body.

Although such a doctrine of an immortal soul is usually appealed to in order to answer questions about the meaning of death, it is logical to assert that the soul, whose existence is independent of the body, may therefore originate independently from the body.

The contact with Zoroastrianism, which was the dominant religion within the Achaemenid Empire founded by Cyrus the Great, as well as Hellenic thought led to incorporation of religious ideas from those cultures into Judaism, including the development of notions of an immaterial and immortal soul distinct from the body and a moralized afterlife.

The notion of an immortal soul was not always even part of Judaism.

Hartshorne expresses this implied identification of individual immortality with a «soul - substance» when he writes that the notion of an «immortal soul» has «muddled and confused many problems» (CSPM 45).

The second view is akin to the classical Greek vision of an immortal soul being liberated from imprisonment in the physical body.

For Wood we do not need to posit something ahistorically and cross-culturally universal to all human beings, something «objective» like an invisible and immortal soul (which paideia presupposed in ancient Athens), of which «dispositions» and «character traits» are modifications.

I've been reading Michael Newton's «Journey of Souls» and the first words in the book are» See through the eyes of the immortal soul.»

Though some texts are distorted to try to prove the idea of an immortal soul, they are in fact just that, distorted to say something that they don't say because they are read with the false lens of this pagan concept.

Many of the early «Church Fathers» were highly influenced by the pagan Greek ideas of Plato and Aristotle, who taught the immortal soul idea.