And American sovereign
immunity laws prevent them from suing the federal government without its consent.
Not exact matches
That's because jurisdiction just controls what that country's courts do — American jurisdiction means that American courts are willing to try the person and American
law enforcement can arrest them if they set foot in America, and the only time the US doesn't get to establish jurisdiction is if US
law prevents it (e.g. the Constitution) or if an international treaty forbids it (e.g. diplomatic
immunity).
However this power «enjoys any form of
immunity from the rules of the EC Treaty on freedom of establishment, can not, in particular, justify the Member State of incorporation, by requiring the winding - up or liquidation of the company, in
preventing that company from converting itself into a company governed by the
law of the other Member State, to the extent that it is permitted under that
law to do so».
Until now, a 1976
law has
prevented this, as it gave foreign nations
immunity to lawsuits from US courts.
We are delighted that the Supreme Court has recognised that the UK's State
Immunity Act is too generous to foreign states,
preventing employees, including many vulnerable workers, accessing justice and going well beyond the requirements of international
law.
(1) With the intent to deprive any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the
laws or of equal privileges and
immunities under the
laws or for the purpose of
preventing the constituted authorities of this state or any subdivision thereof from, or hindering them in, giving or securing to all persons within this state the equal protection of the
laws;
He relied on the application to a state by s 20 of the State
Immunity Act 1978 (SIA 1978) of Art 29 of the Vienna Convention, which was given force of
law by the Diplomatic Privileges Act 1964 and which, it was said, required the UK, including its courts, to «treat him with due respect and... take all appropriate steps to
prevent any attack on his... dignity».