So there remains a pressure on junior scientists to submit their work to high
impact journals rather than to one with the [Registered Reports] option,» Schwarzkopf agrees.
Not exact matches
«The identification of a potentially injurious
impact or series of
impacts via real - time monitoring of head
impact exposure in athletes may [not only] facilitate the early recognition and management of brain injury in helmeted sports,» argues Richard M. Greenwald, PhD of the Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth College, lead author of an editorial in the March 2012 Clinical
Journal of Sports Medicine, [6] but «permit early intervention, potentially in advance of an injury,
rather than simply as a management tool postinjury.»
«The identification of a potentially injurious
impact or series of
impacts via real - time monitoring of head
impact exposure in athletes may [not only] facilitate the early recognition and management of brain injury in helmeted sports,» argues Richard M. Greenwald, PhD of the Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth College, in an editorial in the March 2012 Clinical
Journal of Sports Medicine, [12] but «permit early intervention, potentially in advance of an injury,
rather than simply as a management tool postinjury.»
Following this trend, last week Nature Publishing Group (NPG) launched Scientific Reports, an author - pays, open - access, online - only
journal, which reviews papers on technical soundness
rather than
impact.
At last month's Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting — an annual gathering of laureates and young scientists — Nobel prize - winner Randy Schekman, founder of open - access
journal eLife, insisted that researchers should be judged on the quality of their research,
rather than the
impact factor of the
journal in which they publish or the reputation of their institution.
He insisted that researchers should be judged on the quality of their research,
rather than the
impact factor of the
journal in which they publish or their institution's reputation.
Rather than scoring
journals by their
impact within the scientific community, Altmetric scores individual articles based on buzz: stories in the media and references on blogs, Twitter, Facebook, and even Wikipedia.
My copy of Patronek's 1998 article, «Free - roaming and feral cats — their
impact on wildlife and human beings,» published in the
Journal of the American Veterinary Medicine Association (JAVMA), is becoming
rather shabby, as I continue making notes in the margins and covering it with a rainbow assortment of highlighter.
Subscription pricing is also not based primarily on cost, but
rather on «article volume;
journal impact factor;
journal usage; editorial processes; competitive considerations; and other revenue streams such as commercial contributions from advertising, reprints and supplements.»