As a result, building out natural gas — or so - called «cleaner» fuel options — to replace coal plants would have a near indistinguishable
impact on global warming over the next century.
Ammann 2007, Lockwood 2007, Foukal 2006, Scafetta 2006, Usoskin 2005 and many other papers (here is a more comprehensive list) all find the sun has had a minimal
impact on global warming over the past 30 years.
Not exact matches
The report found that while disposable nappies used
over 2 1/2 years would have a
global warming impact of 550 kg of CO2 reusable nappies produced 570 kg of CO2
on average.
«
Warming greater than 2 degrees Celsius above 19th - century levels is projected to be disruptive, reducing
global agricultural productivity, causing widespread loss of biodiversity and — if sustained
over centuries — melting much of the Greenland ice sheet with ensuing rise in sea levels of several meters,» the AGU declares in its first statement in four years
on «Human
Impacts on Climate.»
Also, for those interested,
on page 41 of the Arctic Climate
Impact Assessment Synthesis Report, is found a description of their Key Finding # 2 which includes the statement «Climate models indicate that the local
warming over Greenland is likely to be one to three times the
global average.»
CO 2 equivalents: The GWP value (
Global Warming Potential) of a gas is defined as the cumulative
impact on the greenhouse effect of 1 tonne of the gas compared with that of 1 tonne of CO 2
over a specified period of time.
This doesn't address longer causal connections, but if the net
impact of temperature
on CO2 can be shown to be neutral or in the negative direction
over then long term, than cointegration probably means that CO2 is causing
global warming.
On the contrary, roughly 80 percent of HOT is devoted to on - the - ground reporting that focuses on solutions — not just the relatively well known options for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and otherwise limiting global warming, but especially the related but much less recognized imperative of preparing our societies for the many significant climate impacts (e.g., stronger storms, deeper droughts, harsher heat waves, etc.,) that, alas, are now unavoidable over the years ahea
On the contrary, roughly 80 percent of HOT is devoted to
on - the - ground reporting that focuses on solutions — not just the relatively well known options for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and otherwise limiting global warming, but especially the related but much less recognized imperative of preparing our societies for the many significant climate impacts (e.g., stronger storms, deeper droughts, harsher heat waves, etc.,) that, alas, are now unavoidable over the years ahea
on - the - ground reporting that focuses
on solutions — not just the relatively well known options for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and otherwise limiting global warming, but especially the related but much less recognized imperative of preparing our societies for the many significant climate impacts (e.g., stronger storms, deeper droughts, harsher heat waves, etc.,) that, alas, are now unavoidable over the years ahea
on solutions — not just the relatively well known options for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and otherwise limiting
global warming, but especially the related but much less recognized imperative of preparing our societies for the many significant climate
impacts (e.g., stronger storms, deeper droughts, harsher heat waves, etc.,) that, alas, are now unavoidable
over the years ahead.
Longtime readers will recall how I've cited the Talking Heads lyric «same as it ever was» quite often
over the years in assessing negotiations aimed at forging a new
global agreement
on slowing
global warming and limiting its
impacts.
Also, for those interested,
on page 41 of the Arctic Climate
Impact Assessment Synthesis Report, is found a description of their Key Finding # 2 which includes the statement «Climate models indicate that the local
warming over Greenland is likely to be one to three times the
global average.»
[UPDATE] After visiting various research buildings, he gave a pep talk
on the energy revolution he said was vital if the United States and the world are to avoid conflicts
over limited supplies of oil and eventual disruptive
impacts from human - caused
global warming.
The «Clean Sky» initiative, reports Israel21c is the largest European research project ever and is designed to tackle
global warming — with a budget estimated to reach
over 1.6 billion Euros, the project «aims to radically improve the
impact of air transport
on the environment with the goal of eliminating environmental pollution by reducing greenhouse gases.»
See Stowasser & Hamilton, Relationship between Shortwave Cloud Radiative Forcing and Local Meteorological Variables Compared in Observations and Several
Global Climate Models, Journal of Climate 2006; Lauer et al., The
Impact of
Global Warming on Marine Boundary Layer Clouds
over the Eastern Pacific — A Regional Model Study, Journal of Climate 2010.
I am not at all surprised to find climate skeptics preferring Mike's description
over mine, given that mine tries to fit the current understanding of the
impact of rising CO2
on temperature to the data while Mike's uses gross overfitting to show that one does not need CO2 to explain recent
global warming.
Observational records show that anthropogenic - influenced climate change has already had a profound
impact on global and U.S.
warm season climate
over the past 30 years, and there is increasing contrast between geographic regions that are climatologically wet and dry - the hypothesis that the «wet gets wetter, dry gets drier» is seen in a new paper by Chang et al..
Over the last decade, she has reported
on the ecological and human
impacts of
global warming from some of the most remote areas of the Arctic.
The
impact of the Climategate story
on the public discourse
over global warming legislation is an interesting tale that will be in flux for the foreseeable future.
Most
global warming skeptics believe that humans have some measurable
impact on global temperatures and the climate, but that natural climate forces,
over longer periods, will overwhelm the human influence... in addition, skeptics believe that the human influence will not result in the hysterical catastrophic climate disasters presented by doomsday pundits...
«The authors write that «the Mediterranean region is one of the world's most vulnerable areas with respect to
global warming,»... they thus consider it to be extremely important to determine what
impact further temperature increases might have
on the storminess of the region... produced a high - resolution record of paleostorm events along the French Mediterranean coast
over the past 7000 years... from the sediment bed of Pierre Blanche Lagoon [near Montpellier, France]... nine French scientists, as they describe it, «recorded seven periods of increased storm activity at 6300 - 6100, 5650 - 5400, 4400 - 4050, 3650 - 3200, 2800 - 2600, 1950 - 1400, and 400 - 50 cal yr BP,» the latter of which intervals they associate with the Little Ice Age.
Keep in mind, also, that the data are measured
over a time period that largely predates the polarization related to
global warming — so using that study as a way to confirm assertions about the
impact of the climate wars
on public trust in scientists is motivated reasoning in its purest form.
In this study by PSD and GSD, climatologists want to assess the
impact of a
warmer Gulf of Mexico (predicted by
global climate models) and determine the
impact on warm season (July) precipitation
over the central US.
Clearly, the huge growth in CO2 levels has had zero
global warming impact on the 5 - year temperature change
over the last 18 years, contrary to the Democrats» «consensus» predictions.
Complaints focus
on the environmental
impacts of mountaintop removal mining, the projected high costs of carbon capture and storage, the human health dangers of large, rapid releases of carbon dioxide, the
global warming risk posed by small levels leakage
over long periods, increases in coal mining needed to run scrubbers as well as carbon capture and storage systems.
Back in 2009, countries including the United States, Germany, Britain, and Japan promised $ 30 billion in aid to help developing countries adapt to the
impacts of
global warming and switch
over to cleaner energy sources, with more
on the way.
It's also one of the reasons that I linked to Hoffman et al at Bart's in the first place... None of this changes the fact that
global warming is going to be a huge hit
on planetary biodiversity further into this century, and
over coming centuries, both through direct effects and through exacerbation of other non-climate-change
impacts.
Americans are becoming more divided in their opinion
on impact of
global warming and humanity's role in the phenomenon, as the number of
global warming skeptics has roughly doubled
over the past 10 years to encompass one in four of the population.
However,
on a more local level,
global warming may have a significant
impact, as original and newly introduced species spread faster from one place to another and take
over new patches of habitat.
The scientific paper, entitled «Why Models Run Hot,» concludes that the computer models overstated the
impact of CO2
on the climate: «The
impact of anthropogenic
global warming over the next century... may be no more than one - third to one - half of IPCC's current projections.»
Hurricane Katrina and other major tropical storms spur debate
over impact of
global warming on storm intensity.
Additionally, the IPCC Summary for Policymakers (SPM) noted that, if
global warming trends persist as predicted
over the next century, the
impact on human systems could be catastrophic.
Natural gas may have lower greenhouse gas emissions when burned than coal, but widespread switching
over to natural gas for electricity won't have much of an
impact on reducing
global warming, a new study from the National
Richard is
on the way to Nunavut to go sledding and «witness first - hand the dramatic
impact of
global warming», but stopped in Toronto to crap all
over the Government's new environmental plans as being too little and way too late, and to launch FLICK
Climate change and California:: Climate Change Expected to Drastically Alter California::
Global Warming or Not: The Debate
Over California's Wildfires The
impact of climate change
on biodiversity:: Alternative Economy Needed for Biodiversity?