In the unlikely event that this — far too lengthy — paper gets accepted in a reputable scientific journal,
its impact on the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis or on the MSM's biased opinion of this hypothesis will be negligible.
Not exact matches
Secondly, while there are indeed lots of other unsustainable human
impacts on ecosystems and the Earth's biosphere generally, the rapidly escalating effects of
anthropogenic global warming threaten to overwhelm all of those other problems in the very near future, with devastating
impacts not only for human civilization and the human species, but for all life
on Earth, for a long, long time.
Such a report must refrain from ignoring basic scientific practices, as the SPM authors blatantly do when claiming to be able to quantify with high precision their confidence in the
impact of
anthropogenic C02 emissions
on global warming.
More Scientific Evidence For CO2's Dubious Climate
Impact Emerges Image Source: Robertson and Chilingar, 2017 According to the most basic precepts of
anthropogenic global warming (AGW), variations in CO2 concentrations exert significant control
on sea surface temperatures, glaciers, sea levels, and generalized climate dynamics (i.e., precipitation patterns).
Observational records show that
anthropogenic - influenced climate change has already had a profound
impact on global and U.S.
warm season climate over the past 30 years, and there is increasing contrast between geographic regions that are climatologically wet and dry - the hypothesis that the «wet gets wetter, dry gets drier» is seen in a new paper by Chang et al..
See: Beenstock, M., Reingewertz, Y., and Paldor, N.: Polynomial cointegration tests of
anthropogenic impact on global warming, Earth Syst.
TWITTER has become a hotbed of debate between staunch believers of catastrophic
anthropogenic global warming (CAGW) and those sceptical of the supposed adverse
impacts of mankind's energy emissions
on planet Earth.
We call
on all people and nations to recognize the serious and potentially irreversible
impacts of
global warming caused by the
anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases and other pollutants, and by changes in forests, wetlands, grasslands, and other land uses.
Beenstock, Reingewertz, and Paldor, Polynomial cointegration tests of
anthropogenic impact on global warming, Earth Syst.
For quantitative results, I recommend using the polynomial cointegration methodology used by Beenstock et al. 2012 Polynomial cointegration tests of
anthropogenic impact on global warming M. Beenstock, Y. Reingewertz, and N. Paldor Earth Syst.
Earlier this year, we submitted our paper, Quantifying the consensus
on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature, to the high -
impact journal Environmental Research Letters (ERL).
The scientific paper, entitled «Why Models Run Hot,» concludes that the computer models overstated the
impact of CO2
on the climate: «The
impact of
anthropogenic global warming over the next century... may be no more than one - third to one - half of IPCC's current projections.»