Investing on the advice of an inexperienced intermediary or in a fund having management involved in dubious activities can
impact your fund performance adversely.
There is also the risk that changes in the value of a swap held by the Fund may not correlate with the Fund's other investments, which could
impact Fund performance.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage
performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their
performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse
impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse
impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the
impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional
funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or
impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Question: How do you think recent poor
performance of the public market will
impact early stage companies, such as those seeking seed or Series A
funding?
Mutual
funds are generally more tax inefficient than ETFs and, as a result, are typically more negatively
impacted than ETFs when comparing
performance based on post-tax returns rather than total returns.
Cambridge Associates and the Global
Impact Investing Network have collaborated to launch the Impact Investing Benchmark, the first comprehensive analysis of the financial performance of market rate private equity and venture capital impact investing
Impact Investing Network have collaborated to launch the
Impact Investing Benchmark, the first comprehensive analysis of the financial performance of market rate private equity and venture capital impact investing
Impact Investing Benchmark, the first comprehensive analysis of the financial
performance of market rate private equity and venture capital
impact investing
impact investing
funds.
Bond
funds typically own a number of individual bonds of varying maturities, so the
impact of any single bond's
performance is lessened if that issuer should fail to pay interest or principal.
As a result of the payment, the
performance of the
Fund for periods as of and after August 20, 2013, is expected to be
impacted by the increase in the
Fund's NAV.
Notice in the last bit of this chart how that small - and historically insignificant - period of slightly lagging stock
performance has
impacted Fund returns since May.
To understand the effect of this modest shortfall in stock selection
performance over the past 8 months, recall that when the
Fund is hedged against the
impact of market fluctuations (and provided that our long - put / short - call index option combinations have identical strike prices and expirations), its returns are roughly equal to:
We build focused
funds from a select list of eligible securities to allow our best ideas to have a meaningful
impact on
fund performance.
Because the Oakmark Select and Oakmark Global Select
Funds are non-diversified, the
performance of each holding will have a greater
impact on the
Funds» total return, and may make the
Fund's returns more volatile than a more diversified f
Fund's returns more volatile than a more diversified
fundfund.
Other factors also
impact portfolio
performance; most notably, the specific market segments in which it is invested — durations of junk bond
funds will exceed durations of treasury
funds with similar maturities.
To provide transparency and support investment decisions, this tool allows you to estimate the
impact of expenses on future
performance of Putnam mutual
funds.
Because Oakmark Select
Fund and Oakmark Global Select Fund are non-diversified, the performance of each holding will have a greater impact on the Funds» total return, and may make the Funds» returns more volatile than a more diversified f
Fund and Oakmark Global Select
Fund are non-diversified, the performance of each holding will have a greater impact on the Funds» total return, and may make the Funds» returns more volatile than a more diversified f
Fund are non-diversified, the
performance of each holding will have a greater
impact on the
Funds» total return, and may make the
Funds» returns more volatile than a more diversified
fundfund.
With short sales, losses are potentially unlimited and the expenses involved with the short strategy may
impact the
performance of the
Fund.
Because the Oakmark Global Select
Fund is non-diversified, the performance of each holding will have a greater impact on the Fund's total return, and may make the Fund's returns more volatile than a more diversified f
Fund is non-diversified, the
performance of each holding will have a greater
impact on the
Fund's total return, and may make the Fund's returns more volatile than a more diversified f
Fund's total return, and may make the
Fund's returns more volatile than a more diversified f
Fund's returns more volatile than a more diversified
fundfund.
What's so intriguing about the Charlotte - Mecklenburg study is that in this case, resegregation was accompanied by increased
funding to minority - dominated schools, to diminish the
impact on student
performance in high - poverty neighborhoods.
Nation's Only Federally
Funded Voucher Program Has Negative Effect on Student Achievement, Study Finds (The Washington Post) Associate Professor Martin West weighs in on new research behind voucher programs and their
impact on students»
performance.
This finding has a significant
impact on teachers and schools as policy makers put more emphasis on the labels for
performance funding, teacher evaluations and other accountability measures.
To be clear, our findings do not indicate that every
performance - based
funding policy fails, but that the average
performance - based
funding policy has no
impact on the number of students making it to graduation.
When analyzing student
performance, it is important to consider the district demographics since this may
impact how some resources are allocated or how districts are
funded.
The grant
funded a five - year study to assess the
impact of Jeffco's proposed Strategic Compensation plan (a targeted
performance - based compensation system) on student achievement and on attracting, retaining, and rewarding high performing educators.
What remained unclear after the first study, is whether the school
funding model and resulting disparity as measured by the «Funding Disparity Rank» has a direct impact on student performance and o
funding model and resulting disparity as measured by the «
Funding Disparity Rank» has a direct impact on student performance and o
Funding Disparity Rank» has a direct
impact on student
performance and outcome?
Impacts of
Performance Pay Under the Teacher Incentive
Fund: Study Design Report.
Funding has a significant
impact on student
performance.
The legislature can truly
impact student
performance by settling the CCJEF case and enacting real finance reform to
fund Connecticut schools adequately.
It
impacts the
performance of students, the types of teachers and administrators schools can recruit, and
funding.
Fewer than half the districts carried out all required components of the grant, potentially indicating implementation challenges with pay - for -
performance systems.85 The relative
impact of the programs evaluated depended on program design elements such as the amount of compensation provided, the link between individual efforts and rewards, and whether the funding is perceived as temporary or permanent (see sidebar on Washington D.C.'s IMPACT sy
impact of the programs evaluated depended on program design elements such as the amount of compensation provided, the link between individual efforts and rewards, and whether the
funding is perceived as temporary or permanent (see sidebar on Washington D.C.'s
IMPACT sy
IMPACT system).
In addition to ESEA waiver requirements that districts incorporate evaluation data into personnel decisions (though compensation isn't specified), the Teacher Incentive
Fund (TIF), a federal grant program that has allocated over $ 2 billion since its inception, began supporting state and district efforts to implement
performance - based compensation in 2006.79 Grantees from across the country have included Miami - Dade County Public Schools, Mississippi, Pittsburgh Public Schools, Seattle Public Schools, and Washington, D.C. Public Schools (see Case Study: Lessons From Washington, D.C.'s
IMPACT System).
IDRA's testimony, «The State of Texas Open - Enrollment Charter Schools and a Modest Proposal to Diversify and Improve Public Charter Schools,» focuses on issues
impacting the Texas Senate's study of the approval, expansion, and revocation of public charter schools in Texas, including the
performance of charter schools in Texas and efficiency concerns related to the expanded
funding of charter schools.
This, combined with the fact that there is a directly negative relationship between residential mobility and student academic
performance, particularly for students in low - income or single - parent families (Scanlon and Devine), shows how mobility patterns based on a long history of housing segregation can have direct
impacts on individual students before they even affect institutional matters like
funding.
BlackRock's sustainable
funds are designed to meet the
performance characteristics of traditional investments while targeting specific social
impact objectives, such as reducing the carbon footprint of an investment portfolio.
Although it is not listed in the
fund prospectus, turnover ratio can have a substantial
impact on a
fund's
performance and tax liability, and those who ignore this factor may be forfeiting more money than they realize over time.
In case a share class is created after the
fund's launch date, a simulated past
performance is used, based upon the
performance of an existing share class within the
fund, taking into account the difference in the ongoing charges and the portfolio transaction costs, and including the
impact of any
performance fees if applicable.
Portfolio costs have a direct
impact on portfolio
performance; we seek to keep the total expense structure low by utilizing low cost index
funds, ETFs and institutional class mutual
funds.
Portfolio turnover can
impact a mutual
fund's overall
performance in several ways.
The
impact on
fund performance of holding cash.
Now that bond yields are down closer to 4 %, it makes a lot less sense, and has a greater
impact on your mutual
fund's
performance.
The
funds offer other share classes subject to different fees and expenses that will
impact their
performance
During this webcast, we covered: • How innovative companies can lead to above average growth • Key objectives of the
Fund and their
impact on current
performance • Our proprietary portfolio management process •
Fund performance YTD
During this webcast, we covered: • Our proprietary portfolio management process • Personnel changes made in 2015 and the people managing the
Fund • Key objectives over the last few years and their
impact on current
performance •
Fund performance YTD •
Fund outlook for the 2nd half of 2017 & beyond
The
Funds are non-diversified, and fluctuations in individual holdings will have a greater
impact on the
Funds»
performance.
The
Funds may also invest in derivative instruments, and a small investment could have a large potential
impact on the
performance of the
Funds.
The
Fund focuses its investments in specific regions or countries, thereby increasing the
impact of events and developments associated with the region or country which can adversely affect
performance.
Understanding these fees is important since they have a large
impact on the
performance of investments in a
fund.
These fees vary widely and can have a dramatic
impact on the
performance of an investment in the
fund.
This is also
impacted by the markets where insurer
funds are invested and their
performance.
Wrote an article that considers the
impact on mutual
fund closures and mergers on reported
performance
«While currency exchange rate fluctuations may have a significant
impact on our results in any given year or quarter,» the CPP Investment Board writes in a recent report, «we do not expect them to have a significant
impact on the
Fund's long - term
performance.»