Sentences with phrase «impacting real audiences»

Not exact matches

So my question is will the fashion audience tire because we are not able to give any real impact and more or less our opinions are biased or crushed under the sea of goodies?

This is a case where what the audience knows about an actress in «real life» might bleed through to positively impact her portrayal of a character.

With that said, writers / directors Richard Glatzer and Wash Westmoreland (the former of whom recently died from his own battle with a terrible disease, ALS) do a good job of portraying the illness and the effect it has on the people around those afflicted without cheapening its real - world impact or pandering to the audience.

When you commit to the story you want to tell, it tends to have a much more resonant impact on the audience... The audience can tell you they love chocolate ice cream, but if you give it to them every day, they're going to get sick of it real fast.

Hopes for real substance are pretty much deflated as well, as the plotting shifts from something's - rotten - in - Denmark to libertarian - Alex - Jones - Illuminati - conspiracy - territory, and while the film's ballsiness in its twists, and their impact on the movies going forward, is admirable, it smacks of being afraid to have a real viewpoint for fear of alienating some of their audience.

While my clever paper clip assignment may have engaged my kids for the duration of the lesson, their work didn't have an audience outside the classroom, didn't have a lasting impact, and didn't extend to a real - life application of skills.

Many of our PBL projects are authentic and reach real audiences to make real impact in the world around us.

ECHOS engage students in real world learning experiences in which students apply advanced content and methods to develop products and services that have an impact on intended audiences.

Certainly, it has no long - term impact on the «real world» success or failure of a work, as we can clearly see with the Success of Manga, and MAUS, and WALKING DEAD, and FUN HOME and PERSEPOLIS (etc etc etc) out among the Mass audience.

2011 Images of the Mind, Deutches Hygiene - Museum, Dresden DE; Moravian Gallery, Brno, CZ The View from a Volcano: The Kitchen's Soho Years 1971 - 86, The Kitchen, New York, US The Quintet of the Astonished, Everson Museum, Syracuse, US G - d Only Knows Who the Audience Is, CCA Wattis Institute for Contemporary Arts, San Francisco, US Real Virtuality, The Museum of the Moving Image, Astoria, New York, US Passion in Venice, Museum of Biblical Art, New York, US Open Ears 2011, CAFKA, Open Ears Festival, Kitchner, Ontario, CA Influential Element: Exploring the Impact of Water, Long Beach Museum of Art, US Film Fridays Series (Screening), The Warsity Center for the Arts, Southern Illinois, US The Artist's Museum, Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles, US Exchange Evolution, Long Beach Museum of Art, US Videosphere: A New Generation, Albright - Knox Art Gallery, Buffalo, New York, US Time and Place, Kunsthalle Detroit, Michigan, US Watch This!

Ray's answer makes it obvious (for me) that reality is very complex and far from being explainable by simple, hand - made arguments for the general audience; that's why I think that trying to explain «simply» the very complex phenomena involved in radiation transfer is just lost time - and in my opinion the REAL issues associated with social impacts of GW are not primarily associated with the detailed physics of the phenomenon.

REDD + has stimulated almost every dimension of forest activity: real - time satellite tracking of global forest loss; local communities using handheld data devices; long - simmering disputes over forest ownership and use; methods for benefit sharing; nested accounting to meld project and national approaches; the role of women in forest stewardship; the place for certification and reduced impact logging; enticements of billions from donors; open discussion of illegal timber trade and corruption; public platforms for indigenous groups to command large audiences, and many more... the exponential interest in REDD + has been tremendous.

As part of our contribution, CSW commented that the document might carry greater relevance for decision - makers who want to advance a needed adaptation agenda to an unconvinced or climate - skeptic audience (a very real possibility) by including more explicit language on the ways in which climate change issues can be framed to appeal to diverse groups — for example, emphasizing the potential damages to people and property to one community, the negative impacts to industry in another.

They garner major publicity worldwide, reach a vast audience which would not otherwise know, and have a real impact.

Consequently, a whole new audience has been reached, and many of them are potential homebuyers who have not been following the minutiae of data - driven real estate news that more directly impacts the supply - and - demand equation, such as interest rates, inventory and tax reform.

But since I'm speaking chiefly to an audience of real estate professionals and not policy analysts, I thought I'd share a more practical section of the book (though I'd love to hear your thoughts on universal basic housing and how it might impact the industry, for good or bad).