There should be a complete ban on
the implantation of a human embryo created by the application of cloning technology into a womb, or any treatment of such a human embryo intended to result in its development into a viable infant.
Not exact matches
The court reasoned that the treaty's drafters were actually concerned only to protect life from the moment
of implantation, and that the
human embryo is not a person under the American Convention because it is not a person under certain treaties elsewhere in the world.
But the summit's organizers concluded that actually trying to produce a
human pregnancy from such modified germ cells or
embryos, either through in vitro fertilization (IVF) with the sperm or eggs or the
implantation of an
embryo, is currently «irresponsible» because
of ongoing safety concerns and a lack
of societal consensus.
Some bioethicists have called for a new international ban that would clearly prohibit the
implantation of a
human clone in part because
of the tantalizing research uses for nascent
embryos.
Opponents said that the measure should have banned somatic cell nuclear transfer; it criminalized only the «
implantation»
of an
embryo into a woman to create a
human clone.
So this language in effect means alterations
of embryonic cells can not be done in the United States if there is any intent to treat a
human being, including
implantation of an altered
embryo into a woman's uterus.
A new technique that allows
embryos to develop in vitro beyond the
implantation stage (when the
embryo would normally implant into the womb) has been developed by scientists at the University
of Cambridge allowing them to analyse for the first time key stages
of human embryo development up to 13 days after fertilisation.