Sentences with phrase «implement home visiting programs»

MIECHV is an unprecedented scale - up of evidence - based home visiting models across the country, with each including a thoughtful evaluation to generate knowledge about how to most effectively implement home visiting programs that produce positive outcomes.

Therefore, every eligible state and jurisdiction has the opportunity to implement home visiting programs for their at - risk communities.

Researchers should continue building the knowledge base about how to implement home visiting programs effectively by reporting information on implementation alongside results of rigorous effectiveness evaluations.

For example, implementation research can be used to assess the readiness of local agencies to implement home visiting programs with fidelity.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act allocated $ 1.5 billion annually for the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV) to fund states in implementing home visiting program models for families with children from birth to age 5 as well as pregnant women.

Regardless of the amount of prior experience primary contractors and / or subcontractors within each community had implementing home visiting programs at the onset of THV, after five years, each of the THV communities was successfully recruiting and enrolling high - risk families.

Although most states were already implementing home visiting programs, MIECHV increased the use of evidence - based models to deliver care to high - risk families.

He provides training / technical assistant to the local implementing home visiting programs to include: participant recruitment, enrollment and retention; program fidelity and implementation; data collection and analysis; outcome measure development and evaluation; and provision of support services in the community for enhanced family health, functioning, and the prevention of child abuse and neglect.

The Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Technical Assistance Coordinating Center (MIECHV TACC), led by ZERO TO THREE in partnership with the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago, and Walter R. McDonald & Associates, Inc. (WRMA), regularly provides webinars to support MIECHV grantees in implementing home visiting programs.

States have successfully implemented home visiting programs in local communities since the 1980s.

Not exact matches

Over the last two decades, a growing number of home visiting programs have been implemented in developed and developing countries.

As interest in the promise of evidence - based home visiting programs to improve outcomes for children and families grows, policymakers and practitioners need guidance about how to implement them effectively and sustain high - fidelity implementation over the long term.

With regard to home visit content, home visiting programs tend to be more effective when services are comprehensive in focus, implement the program model with rigour, and when they target families» multiple needs.

Home visiting programs are designed and implemented to support families in providing an environment that promotes the healthy growth and development of their children.

The Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Technical Assistance Coordinating Center (MIECHV TACC) provides support to grantees implementing MIECHV - funded home visiting progrHome Visiting Technical Assistance Coordinating Center (MIECHV TACC) provides support to grantees implementing MIECHV - funded home visiting pVisiting Technical Assistance Coordinating Center (MIECHV TACC) provides support to grantees implementing MIECHV - funded home visiting progrhome visiting pvisiting programs.

Eight existing home visiting programs met the minimal legislative threshold for federal funding: Early Head Start, the Early Intervention Program, Family Check - up, Healthy Families America, Healthy Steps, Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low rathome visiting programs met the minimal legislative threshold for federal funding: Early Head Start, the Early Intervention Program, Family Check - up, Healthy Families America, Healthy Steps, Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low Program, Family Check - up, Healthy Families America, Healthy Steps, Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low ratHome Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low rating.

Finally, a Finnish trial of universal home visiting by nurses35 and two U.S. programs implemented by master's degree - level mental health or developmental clinicians have found significant effects on a number of important child behavioural problems.36, 37 Additionally, a paraprofessional home visitation program found effects on externalizing and internalizing behaviours at child age 2; however due to the large number of effects measured in this study, replication of the findings is warranted.38

Home visiting initiatives at the state level should seek to coordinate across all home visiting programs being implemented within the state (whether federally funded or not), while also embedding home visiting within a broader state early childhood sysHome visiting initiatives at the state level should seek to coordinate across all home visiting programs being implemented within the state (whether federally funded or not), while also embedding home visiting within a broader state early childhood syshome visiting programs being implemented within the state (whether federally funded or not), while also embedding home visiting within a broader state early childhood syshome visiting within a broader state early childhood system.

MIECHV is the federal program that supports states in implementing evidence - based home visiting programs for at - risk families.

Tribal Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (Tribal MIECHV) provides grants to tribal organizations to develop, implement, and evaluate home visiting programs in American Indian and AHome Visiting (Tribal MIECHV) provides grants to tribal organizations to develop, implement, and evaluate home visiting programs in American Indian aVisiting (Tribal MIECHV) provides grants to tribal organizations to develop, implement, and evaluate home visiting programs in American Indian and Ahome visiting programs in American Indian avisiting programs in American Indian and Al...

The Affordable Care Act set aside $ 1.5 billion in funding for states to implement evidence - based home - visiting programs to support the health and development of at - risk children, with three percent earmarked for tribal communities.

Based on the success of the Sacramento effort, California offered $ 15 million in grants for both the 2000 - 01 and 2001 - 02 academic years to districts throughout the state interested in implementing a home - visit program.

Some of those — progress in implementing Common Core standards, greatly expanded summer programs, new college and career programs tied to businesses and the community, home - school visits and new parent - teacher partnerships — will survive.

RTI and PTHV, in partnership with Dr. Steven Sheldon from Johns Hopkins University, also plan to extend this research to examine how the home visit program is being implemented across the four sites and its impact on parent engagement and student achievement.

The Governor's proposed budget reflects some notable advances, such as providing funding to fully implement the Local Control Funding Formula for K - 12 education (designed to direct additional resources to disadvantaged students), continuing to invest in early education and higher education, and creating a home visiting pilot program that would offer a range of supports for families participating in welfare - to - work (CalWORKs).

That said, if your requirements are extensive or might be prohibitive for a foster parent to implement (home visits or the like) the Adoption Ambassadors program could be a great opportunity to experiment with eliminating or relaxing a requirement that might otherwise pose an obstacle to adoption.

Child Care Group, Manchester, NH 6/2010 — Present Parent Educator • Successfully create and develop core individualized plans to meet the educational needs of participating parents • Proactively provide professional instruction and delivery of information to families implementing specified curriculum • Coordinate services with community programs to meet the individual needs of each parent education program • Assess the needs of each family or parent and provide developmentally appropriate information, guidance and support to them • Ascertain that all documentation regarding home visits, attendance records and screening summaries is properly maintained • Represent facility or programs at various events such as seminars and meetings • Organize, facilitate and promote the facility's efforts and vision about parent education directives • Collaborate with teachers and parents to develop and implement individualized consultation plans for extenuating circumstances

«When programs are carefully implemented, participation in home visiting programs has been linked to improved parenting practices (such as increased sensitivity and reduced detachment), increases in maternal education, and the creation of more stable and nurturing environments for children.»

It provides support for federal, state, and community governments to implement established and proven home visiting programs for at - risk children.

The state must clearly define who is responsible for ensuring the programs are implemented with fidelity — whether that be the state program model leads, the primary contractors, or the home visiting program supervisors.

To that end, the primary purpose of this brief is to guide expectations about the extent to which home visiting programs can demonstrate significant and meaningful change when implemented at the community level.

The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) contracted CFRP to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of THV, and CFRP is conducting an ongoing study to better understand the factors that enhance and limit the delivery of evidence - based home visiting programs when they are implemented at the local level.

This brief presents the findings of a larger research paper, currently under review, in which we review the evidence for four home visiting program being implemented with MIECHV funding and compare these effects to population averages and professional recommendations to provide a context in which to interpret those effects.

Over the last two decades, a growing number of home visiting programs have been implemented in developed and developing countries.

As part of the federal Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV), Family Connects is now being implemented across the country including several new communities in Texas.

Eight existing home visiting programs met the minimal legislative threshold for federal funding: Early Head Start, the Early Intervention Program, Family Check - up, Healthy Families America, Healthy Steps, Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low rathome visiting programs met the minimal legislative threshold for federal funding: Early Head Start, the Early Intervention Program, Family Check - up, Healthy Families America, Healthy Steps, Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low Program, Family Check - up, Healthy Families America, Healthy Steps, Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low ratHome Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low rating.

To guide expectations about the extent to which home visiting programs can affect significant and meaningful change when implemented at the community level, CFRP reviewed the effects of four evidence - based home visiting programs participating in the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV) on multiple aspects of early parenthome visiting programs can affect significant and meaningful change when implemented at the community level, CFRP reviewed the effects of four evidence - based home visiting programs participating in the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV) on multiple aspects of early pavisiting programs can affect significant and meaningful change when implemented at the community level, CFRP reviewed the effects of four evidence - based home visiting programs participating in the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV) on multiple aspects of early parenthome visiting programs participating in the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV) on multiple aspects of early pavisiting programs participating in the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV) on multiple aspects of early parentHome Visiting Program (MIECHV) on multiple aspects of early paVisiting Program (MIECHV) on multiple aspects of early parenting.

It also spotlights quality improvement activities, including the Home Visiting Collaborative Improvement & Innovation Network (CoIIN) which is working with 13 MIECHV sites, including Jacksonville and Pinellas County, to test and implement data - driven strategies to increase program performance and impact.

The Northeast Florida Healthy Start Coalition is working very hard to improve breastfeeding initiation and duration rates within the Jacksonville Nurse Family Partnership Program by implementing strategies through the Home Visiting Collaborative Improvement and Innovation Network.

Implementing Early Head Start - Home Visiting United States Department of Health and Human Services & Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness (2011) Provides program implementation information for the Early Head Start - Home Visiting program, including a program model overview, prerequisites for implementation, training to support implementation, materials and forms to support implementation, estimated costs of implementation, program model contact information, and implementation experiences.

Getting to Outcomes for Home Visiting: How to Plan, Implement, and Evaluate a Program in Your Community to Support Parents and Their Young Children Mattox, Hunter, Kilburn, & Wiseman (2013) Describes a 10 - step process that helps empower groups to better plan, implement, and evaluate home - visiting programs, with the goal of achieving the best possible outcoHome Visiting: How to Plan, Implement, and Evaluate a Program in Your Community to Support Parents and Their Young Children Mattox, Hunter, Kilburn, & Wiseman (2013) Describes a 10 - step process that helps empower groups to better plan, implement, and evaluate home - visiting programs, with the goal of achieving the best possible oVisiting: How to Plan, Implement, and Evaluate a Program in Your Community to Support Parents and Their Young Children Mattox, Hunter, Kilburn, & Wiseman (2013) Describes a 10 - step process that helps empower groups to better plan, implement, and evaluate home - visiting programs, with the goal of achieving the best possible Implement, and Evaluate a Program in Your Community to Support Parents and Their Young Children Mattox, Hunter, Kilburn, & Wiseman (2013) Describes a 10 - step process that helps empower groups to better plan, implement, and evaluate home - visiting programs, with the goal of achieving the best possible implement, and evaluate home - visiting programs, with the goal of achieving the best possible outcohome - visiting programs, with the goal of achieving the best possible ovisiting programs, with the goal of achieving the best possible outcomes.

The following resources provide information on selected home visiting programs States and communities are implementing to support expectant parents and families with young children.

These include partnering with states to provide evidence - based home visiting services to at - risk families, working with tribal communities to implement culturally competent home visiting programs, and developing a mechanism to systematically review the evidence of effectiveness for home visiting program models and to conduct a national evaluation of the MIECHV program.

In 2016, 79 percent of programs funded by the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting program saw an increase in household income among participating families.60 Furthermore, investments in MIECHV evidence - based home visiting programs produce a return on investment of $ 1.89 for every dollar spent on implementing the program, in part through reduced spending on the social services noted above.61 These results prove that home visiting programs provide economic benefits for everyone — not just the families that participHome Visiting program saw an increase in household income among participating families.60 Furthermore, investments in MIECHV evidence - based home visiting programs produce a return on investment of $ 1.89 for every dollar spent on implementing the program, in part through reduced spending on the social services noted above.61 These results prove that home visiting programs provide economic benefits for everyone — not just the families that partVisiting program saw an increase in household income among participating families.60 Furthermore, investments in MIECHV evidence - based home visiting programs produce a return on investment of $ 1.89 for every dollar spent on implementing the program, in part through reduced spending on the social services noted above.61 These results prove that home visiting programs provide economic benefits for everyone — not just the families that participhome visiting programs produce a return on investment of $ 1.89 for every dollar spent on implementing the program, in part through reduced spending on the social services noted above.61 These results prove that home visiting programs provide economic benefits for everyone — not just the families that partvisiting programs produce a return on investment of $ 1.89 for every dollar spent on implementing the program, in part through reduced spending on the social services noted above.61 These results prove that home visiting programs provide economic benefits for everyone — not just the families that participhome visiting programs provide economic benefits for everyone — not just the families that partvisiting programs provide economic benefits for everyone — not just the families that participate.

How do leaders in communities and at the state level support Home Visiting programs to implement their models with fidelity, engage effectively in continuous improvement, and attain the hoped - for outcomes with families?

The Division of Public Health is working with the Center for Child and Family Health and the Center for Child and Family Policy at Duke University to effectively implement and sustain Northeast Connects, a short - term, community - based, universal newborn nurse home visiting program.

A unique aspect of the Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE) and MIHOPE - Strong Start projects is that they examine how home visiting services are implemenHome Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE) and MIHOPE - Strong Start projects is that they examine how home visiting services are implVisiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE) and MIHOPE - Strong Start projects is that they examine how home visiting services are implemenhome visiting services are implvisiting services are implemented.

Home visiting programs implementing an evidence - based model in tribal communities understand the commitment to operate with fidelity while delivering a service that respects and honors the cultures of the families they serve.

Since 2012, Idaho has expanded the capacity of EHS programs by selecting the EHS home - based program option as one of the models to implement under the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) proghome - based program option as one of the models to implement under the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) progHome Visiting (MIECHV) program.

Ten home visiting programs, implementing different home visitation models, committed to collect common outcome data, implement best practices, and explore promising new practices.